ESPN pundit claims Mudryk has been a worse signing than Antony or Richarlison

Craig Burley thinks Chelsea's Mykhailo Mudryk has been a worse signing than Antony or Richarlison.

Mykhailo Mudryk, who moved to Chelsea in January from Shakhtar Donetsk, is taking some time adjusting at Stamford Bridge.

The 22-year-old attacker has looked very impressive in bursts during his first seven Blues appearance's, but Graham Potter seems reluctant to play him too much.

ESPN pundit Burley was asked the odd question of which signing has been the most disappointing out of Mudryk, Antony, or Richarlison.

Burley told ESPN: “Mudryk, it's go to be. I'm not a big fan of Antony. Richarlison has been hot and cold, but he's not always had game time.”

First of all, we don't think Mudryk has had enough opportunities to judge him fairly yet.

Tim Sherwood thinks Arsenal dodged a bullet by not signing Mudryk in January, but he's a young winger that needs time.

The Ukraine international has only been in London for a couple of months, which is why are not worried about him in the slightest. In fact, we can't wait to watch him develop in the months ahead.

As for Richarlison, he joined Tottenham last summer as a forward with a proven track record in England. Unfortunately for the 25-year-old, he's scored twice in 27 Spurs appearances.

Meanwhile, 23-year-old winger Antony has seven goals in 30 games so far during his Manchester United debut season.

Mudryk could end up costing Chelsea as much as £89million, as quoted by BBC Sport, so you can understand why there is a lot of focus on how he's playing.

We think everything will be a lot clearer next season when Graham Potter has had time to trim down his gigantic squad.

If Potter wants to stick with this current system, it's going to be interesting to see how Mudryk transitions from an out-and-winger into someone that plays a bit more centrally.