Manchester City CEO Ferran Soriano has insisted the club's success is not solely down to their exorbitant spending on transfers and instead pointed the finger at Premier League rivals Manchester United, Chelsea and Arsenal.
City are rapidly closing in on winning a sensational treble this season after swatting aside Real Madrid to reach the Champions League final, and are also poised to defend their Premier League crown and face United with the FA Cup on the line.
With Pep Guardiola at the helm, the club have reached new heights and continued to build on the staggering progress made since their high-profile takeover in 2008.
However, City have been dogged by claims that they have only clinched silverware as a result of them splashing out on new signings, a suggestion Soriano refutes.
The club's achievements this year have also been overshadowed by the Premier League charging them with over 100 financial rule breaches across multiple seasons, although City have defended their actions and welcomed the probe.
And despite the raft of allegations, Soriano is adamant City have not overspent in comparison to several of their top-flight rivals.
Speaking after the 4-0 victory over Madrid and staunchly backing the club's recruitment process, Soriano told Movistar: 'Look, you only have to look at the investment in player in England in the last year, three years, five years.
'We are never the club spending the most on players.
'There are many other clubs investing more money than us - Chelsea, Manchester United, Arsenal.
'Saying that we've spent a lot of money and we won because of that is just not true.'
Indeed, figures compiled by Transfermarkt have revealed Chelsea are in fact the biggest spenders over the last decade, having spent an eye-watering £1.82billion.
In comparison, City have invested £1.5bn, with United trailing on £1.45bn.
Meanwhile, Soriano also reflected on the prospect of City finally lifting the Champions League trophy for the first time in their history.
'The Champions League is a bit symbolic,' he added.
'We work every day for the Premier League, it's a very difficult tournament to win. If we do it this year, it will be the third in a row, five in six years.
'From my experience, I know that you cannot base all your strategy on winning the Champions League, because it depends on the draw, a bad day… but yes, when we win it, which we will do one day, it will be something symbolic.'
As City push to end their lengthy drought, Jamie Carragher has laid down the gauntlet, claiming the club should not simply settle for a maiden title.
Instead, he believes they must target dominating in the competition.
'There's only one English team that's dominated Europe and that's Liverpool in the late 70s and early 80s,' Carragher said on CBS Sports Golazo.
'Man City are about to win a third league title on the trot, but nobody's ever done four, so they're up there with the absolute best.
'Manchester United won three in a row a couple of times, but they never dominated Europe - they won a Champions League, and City have still got to win the Champions League, but when you took at how good they could become, they should be looking at getting that first Champions League in a few weeks.
'But for the quality they have in terms of the manager, on the pitch and their finances - they can buy who they want virtually - they've got to be looking at trying to dominate Europe.'
DUTCH8UKBLUE
0
You sir are a true fan and deserve to celebrate every one of City's achievements. As you have probably well experienced in your life, most successful clubs have glory hunters and these are the ones that shout the loudest in the good times and never to be seen in the bad. These fans are the ones I'm referring to.
CHEERS MATE! CTID 💙! TREBLE LOADED!😛😝🤪😜
Enigma46
0
I personally have been a MANCHESTER CITY FAN for 55 years! and we have always had a solid loyal fan base! FACT! CTID 💙
You sir are a true fan and deserve to celebrate every one of City's achievements. As you have probably well experienced in your life, most successful clubs have glory hunters and these are the ones that shout the loudest in the good times and never to be seen in the bad. These fans are the ones I'm referring to.
DUTCH8UKBLUE
0
No money - No fans, that's the difference between Man City and the top teams. Simple.
I personally have been a MANCHESTER CITY FAN for 55 years! and we have always had a solid loyal fan base! FACT! CTID 💙
Enigma46
1
It's all about the Money, Chelsea got a lot of new fans when they started winning everything but lost them all now. City "fans" wil do the same. that's why theyll never be a big club, too many glory hunting fans with no loyalty, they can't even fill a stadium week in week out - fact!
Enigma46
1
MCFC ARE A TEAM! THE TEAM! THE "A" TEAM! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! THIS IS A RESULT OF EVERYONE INVOLVED, FROM THE OWNERS, THE COACH,THE BACK ROOM STAFF, THE SCOUTS AND RECRUITMENT, THE PLAYERS,ALLLLLL OF THEM, ALL THE STAFF AT THE STADIUM RIGHT DOWN TO THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE TEA, CLEAN THE FLOORS, THE GROUNDSMAN! MCFC! WE ARE FAMILY! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! CTID 💙
No money - No fans, that's the difference between Man City and the top teams. Simple.
Firedragon147
0
please where is pepe and how much was he got remind me again
70m, did you just compare pepe with greelish and maguire? You do realize we didn't pay 70m at once, it's over 3 years. Do you know his wage? That's still 1 signing about 50m, because the worst manager in arsenals history wanted to prove he has a di*k or was one.
Blaqpablo
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
please where is pepe and how much was he got remind me again
Blaqpablo
0
I just need how many academy players does man City have in the first team compared to the Barcelona era of Messi inesta and xavi and co..... it's money rather I would say Liverpool won the the EPL and CL through their academy
how many does man u have as well
Merciimani
1
What language is this? English? Maybe some punctuations will make sense of your sentence.
Blame the keyboard not me
awhy04
0
Just hater Mondi don’t play you games , the players do .
What language is this? English? Maybe some punctuations will make sense of your sentence.
Merciimani
0
It's the money...plus city ain't winning champions league final.
Just hater Mondi don’t play you games , the players do .
awhy04
1
It's the money...plus city ain't winning champions league final.
Amazudan10
0
Are you ok at all
Lol from a bitter fanbase, tell me since pep took over what have you achieved compared
vobabouy
0
Man utd has spent more than man city since pep took over city, what has man utd achieved with over €900M spending….
[image]
Are you ok at all
Rasdekloz
1
why is it that other clubs can't afford your players?🤣😂👍😭🤡😅
CiaranWalsh246
1
It's the money. plain and simple
Lisiknopsz
2
I just need how many academy players does man City have in the first team compared to the Barcelona era of Messi inesta and xavi and co..... it's money rather I would say Liverpool won the the EPL and CL through their academy
18597076(deleted)
0
It's true. Man United and chelsea spent a lot of money too and yet they aren't where man city is. Man city knows the right players to buy and how to use them properly.
Hi real! We still have our dance That’s true. But it is still a club built on artificially inflated revenues and sponsorships made by companies that look to engage in business not with Man C but with Sheihk Mansour. I think that’s the only reason I’m disappointed with yesterdays match. It means that oil clubs and state owned clubs will make things difficult for traditional clubs to compete. Oil and state owned Clubs didnt build by their own success but are more like accessories for the incredibly wealthy.
Firedragon147
0
I know you are my guy. just wish you were Man u. 🤷🏻
Lengths people go to troll maguire 😂
princeville
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
Nice performance this season though. without you guys, the league would have been really boring.
princeville
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
I know you are my guy. just wish you were Man u. 🤷🏻
Firedragon147
0
your 80mil Anthony vs 51 mill Haaland. 😂😂
You do realize I'm a gunner, right?
princeville
1
MCFC ARE A TEAM! THE TEAM! THE "A" TEAM! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! THIS IS A RESULT OF EVERYONE INVOLVED, FROM THE OWNERS, THE COACH,THE BACK ROOM STAFF, THE SCOUTS AND RECRUITMENT, THE PLAYERS,ALLLLLL OF THEM, ALL THE STAFF AT THE STADIUM RIGHT DOWN TO THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE TEA, CLEAN THE FLOORS, THE GROUNDSMAN! MCFC! WE ARE FAMILY! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! CTID 💙
SIMPLE.
princeville
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
your 80mil Anthony vs 51 mill Haaland. 😂😂
princeville
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
Maguire 80 mill sancho, Anthony. only Manchester City 9 they spend money.
bandis77
0
how about psg if it's money?
did psg had world class manager with clear vision? PSG is just bunch of individual superstars getting big money. Man City is a team
controversial
0
yep its down to money (joined with good recruitment) and actually good choice of manager. saying its not down to money is ridiculous. pep can point finger on whatever player he needs and he gets him. No one can match transfer and wage budget of Man City in Europe (maybe only psg) so they have big advantage in recruitment hence bringing the success to the club
how about psg if it's money?
Belatsch
1
Money city
pouablntz
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
Anthony 80million, what a joke... LoL
Ramona4real
1
It's the money.
Amazudan10
3
Man utd has spent more than man city since pep took over city, what has man utd achieved with over €900M spending….
Firedragon147
0
Ummm so pep manages city for free, right? And 100m for greelish was crowd funding...
bandis77
0
They are saying city used a lot of money to buy players as if Chelsea and united use broom stick to purchase their players
[image]
the difference is Chelsea and Man United were overpaying the mediocre players and change managers quite often so team and style of play isnt stable. City actually got players Pep needed to build his project. and i believe once Pep leaves they will fall apart like Man United did when Ferguson left
Enigma46
2
Man City have and will achieve great things, all they had was a dream...........and 100 Billion dollars
bandis77
0
yep its down to money (joined with good recruitment) and actually good choice of manager. saying its not down to money is ridiculous. pep can point finger on whatever player he needs and he gets him. No one can match transfer and wage budget of Man City in Europe (maybe only psg) so they have big advantage in recruitment hence bringing the success to the club
Preacherboy
6
They are saying city used a lot of money to buy players as if Chelsea and united use broom stick to purchase their players
DUTCH8UKBLUE
5
MCFC ARE A TEAM! THE TEAM! THE "A" TEAM! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! THIS IS A RESULT OF EVERYONE INVOLVED, FROM THE OWNERS, THE COACH,THE BACK ROOM STAFF, THE SCOUTS AND RECRUITMENT, THE PLAYERS,ALLLLLL OF THEM, ALL THE STAFF AT THE STADIUM RIGHT DOWN TO THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE TEA, CLEAN THE FLOORS, THE GROUNDSMAN! MCFC! WE ARE FAMILY! THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAND AND ALL THE WORLD 🌎! CTID 💙
Destrothegoat
0
It's true. Man United and chelsea spent a lot of money too and yet they aren't where man city is. Man city knows the right players to buy and how to use them properly.
Exactly ☺️
Destrothegoat
4
Chelsea got money no wise coach city got money and a wise coach
realBull
4
It's true. Man United and chelsea spent a lot of money too and yet they aren't where man city is. Man city knows the right players to buy and how to use them properly.