Sir Jim Ratcliffe reportedly questioned Manchester United's decision to sign Casemiro - and now it has emerged that club insiders did the same before they bought him.
Chemicals powerhouse Ratcliffe, whose £1.25billion deal for a 25 per cent stake in the club is close to being confirmed, challenged the move while touring the club's Carrington training centre in March.
Manchester United sealed a £60million plunge for Casemiro in August 2022, prising him away from Real Madrid with a four-year contract and ambitious talk.
Mail Sport reported in October that Ratcliffe singled out Casemiro, now 31, as an example of questionable recruitment.
However, The Athletic have deepened the story by suggesting that some United employees preferred Declan Rice on financial grounds, adding precious context to Ratcliffe's concerns.
They cite Casemiro's £350,000-per-week wages as one sticking point, as Rice could have been on much less. Mail Sport understands that he earns £250,000 per week at Arsenal.
While Rice could have cost up to £120m - Arsenal paid £105m for him - that fee could have been spread out over a longer contract to help United comply with Financial Fair Play rules.
Crucially, Rice was only 23 in the summer of 2022 and will have immense potential resale value for years to come.
That's especially relevant as Mail Sport exclusively revealed that John Murtough, United's transfer chief, flew to Saudi Arabia earlier this month to discuss selling Casemiro.
Murtough met with Saudi Pro League chiefs in Riyadh to chew over possible deals for Casemiro, Raphael Varane, Jadon Sancho, and Anthony Martial.
If Ratcliffe was against signing a player of Casemiro's profile, and there is backing at the club for a different policy, then that could indicate the direction in which he will steer the club.
United's transfer in recent years have been pinned on two major approaches: either signing a European veteran with immense pedigree but questions over their age, or young, often unproven talent from abroad for stratospheric fees.
Antony was signed last summer for £85m, despite club scouts initially placing a £25m value on him.
Mail Sport exclusively revealed that Ratcliffe would seek to prioritise homegrown talent to help fire United back to the summit of the game.
Considering The Athletic's latest report, Ratcliffe will be stepping in to a club with competing voices regarding transfer policy and will have to be assertive.
His 25 per cent investment in the game will put him in charge of sporting operations, and INEOS' director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford will play an influential role.
jubaer420
0
Whats wrong with casemiro.. He came and performed immediately.. Rest of them needs time to adapt. Even mount who played epl before.. Homegrown English lad.. He also needs to adapt.. Hojlund needs to adapt.. Rashford still can't perform consistently. Antony, onanan they needs to adapt. Who the fck will perform then.
Lokabcopru
0
Sack them all!!!!!!
kisadknst
0
I can't imagine how United's Board were able to agree £85m for Antony and £75m for Hujlund and £60 for a 30 years old Casemiro and paying him on top £350k a week, who Madrid were about to place on the bench. It happened when they paid £80m for Maguire and also £68m for Mount. Are these people sàne in their brains. Am just asking. 🤷
I salute the various clubs that sold those clown of players to Man U except for casemiro who was near his decline and especially Perez for pulling a masterstroke on panic buyer like Man U, a player With no re-sale value Casemiro. bunch of dunce United [Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
kisadknst
0
What do they mean by Casemiro was prised away from Real Madrid? Isn't it obvious that Real Madrid cashed in on Casemiro because they already bought Tchouameni? That was another masterstroke by Florentino Perez.
you got football business sense that Madrid pulled. indeed a masterstroke by Perez, sold a player With no re-sale value to a panic buyer Man U. bunch of dunce [Crylaugh]
Eky123
1
So y'all forgetting the fact that casemiro has been one of the best players for man united since his arrival and is one of the reasons why we won the carabao cup and qualified for champs league,some football fans are quick to forget and have a short memory. he was a quick fix but he worked well, injuries shud not be a reason to blame a great world class midfielder.
bepbdntuy
0
blame the coach too,he can't do anything outside Holland
Sexymore147
0
Casemiro was never gonna be bench by Madrid you guys just type nonsense
Manchester United bought him on the bench..he was benched as soon as Tcheomeni arrived
S100K
1
I honestly don’t understand it either. All the useless buying
And you spewed senseless and brainless nonsensé. Casemiro left because of the signing of Touchememi or whatever and The other French players, they'll definitely bench him. If they can bench Modric and Kroos, who's Casemiro.
Veabdelmsz
0
dodgy business for sure.
KeronKush
4
What do they mean by Casemiro was prised away from Real Madrid? Isn't it obvious that Real Madrid cashed in on Casemiro because they already bought Tchouameni? That was another masterstroke by Florentino Perez.
nozcioptz
0
I can't imagine how United's Board were able to agree £85m for Antony and £75m for Hujlund and £60 for a 30 years old Casemiro and paying him on top £350k a week, who Madrid were about to place on the bench. It happened when they paid £80m for Maguire and also £68m for Mount. Are these people sàne in their brains. Am just asking. 🤷
I honestly don’t understand it either. All the useless buying
koikoikoi
0
I can't imagine how United's Board were able to agree £85m for Antony and £75m for Hujlund and £60 for a 30 years old Casemiro and paying him on top £350k a week, who Madrid were about to place on the bench. It happened when they paid £80m for Maguire and also £68m for Mount. Are these people sàne in their brains. Am just asking. 🤷
corruption
fomcmrty
0
I can't imagine how United's Board were able to agree £85m for Antony and £75m for Hujlund and £60 for a 30 years old Casemiro and paying him on top £350k a week, who Madrid were about to place on the bench. It happened when they paid £80m for Maguire and also £68m for Mount. Are these people sàne in their brains. Am just asking. 🤷
Casemiro was never gonna be bench by Madrid you guys just type nonsense
Iroe
1
How many times will you repeat this news topic
retacdilpz
0
Fake news when he has not taken over and he already asking your appa is a scam
S100K
3
I can't imagine how United's Board were able to agree £85m for Antony and £75m for Hujlund and £60 for a 30 years old Casemiro and paying him on top £350k a week, who Madrid were about to place on the bench. It happened when they paid £80m for Maguire and also £68m for Mount. Are these people sàne in their brains. Am just asking. 🤷
Reoaipsty
1
Manchester united backroom issues will eventually result in destruction of INEOS and ratcliffe will be clueless about his on future
sekilnotu
0
Mortough main culprit, being director of football how he sanctioned the acquisition of Antony, Mount,