Chelsea are facing a nightmare dilemma over plans for a new stadium.
Blues chiefs believe they have only two options — spend six years away from Stamford Bridge while it is revamped, or pay over the odds to buy land nearby for a new stadium, according to The Sun.
There is also frustration at the lack of progress under the new owners.
Chelsea's plans to redevelop Stamford Bridge appeared to take a major step forwards last October, after the Stoll Charity trustees granted approval to sell the site of homes of military veterans to the club.
The £80million sale of the majority of the Sir Oswald Stoll Mansions site is subject to contract with completion expected in early 2024.
Chelsea had also weighed up a potential stadium relocation to nearby Earl's Court, but are believed to have focused efforts on a £2billion expansion of their existing 40,341-capacity stadium.
CPO board chair Chris Isitt issued a statement to confirm they expect the club to make a decision on their stadium plans shortly, before warning a potential rebuild could take up to seven years.
'CPO has not yet been informed of any decision made by the Club on its future plans for the stadium,' the statement read. 'We believe their decision is due to be finalised shortly, having worked through all the available options.
'Board members may choose to make their own views clear on the process but cannot of course do so until there is a proposal, and its detail can be properly considered.
'As we understand it, although the purchase of the Stoll site has been agreed, it will be some considerable time before the site can be vacated.
'In addition, a new planning application would be required, even though some of that work was done during the earlier project under Roman Abramovich.
'Once an application has been approved, estimates on the time required for demolition and rebuild vary from four years up to as much as seven years, during which time the Club would need to relocate its home games.'
The CPO reiterated that any vote on a proposal from the club would be open to the group's over 14,000 shareholders, with 75 per cent needing to agree for plans to proceed.
The group added that it continues to sell shares during the redevelopment process.
Earls Court Development Company have denied there are any plans for a football stadium at their site.
'We categorically deny that there are any talks taking place with Chelsea FC about a stadium relocation to the Earls Court site,' a statement read.
'After years of consultation with the local community, we have updated our masterplan proposals and will be releasing updated plans in the coming weeks.
'Our scheme will deliver over 4,000 homes, space for 15,000 jobs, acres of public space and cultural venues, restaurants and community facilities. There is no football stadium in the Earls Court masterplan.'
Chelsea have faced a number of obstacles to making the large-scale renovations under former owner Roman Abramovich.
But funds for the rebuild were put aside as part of the £4.25bn acquisition of the club by co-controlling owners Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital in May 2022.
Potential work on the stadium, which would aim to increase capacity to 60,000 in line with that of the club's Premier League rivals, would see the Blues playing away from Chelsea for over four years. An expansion would not begin until 2026 at the earliest.
Venues that have been floated to host the club whilst the renovations are being undertaken have included Wembley, Twickenham, and Craven Cottage, where their west London neighbours Fulham play.
Boehly is believed to have held informal talks with Fulham's owner Shahid Khan about the possibility of groundsharing, but although representing the most convenient move just one mile down the road, a spell in Craven Cottage - capacity 25,700 - could see the Blues miss out on key revenue.
Should Chelsea's owners opt for a stand-by-stand refurbishment the work could take significantly longer than four to five years, and independent experts have called Chelsea's proposed 2030 finish date 'optimistic'.
ceoaeruyz
0
no matter what happens still d best Club in London as a whole Chelsea is MAN football club not Woman club all those foolish London clubs started by letter A an co
yutcklpstu
0
at least they're going to make famous one of those teams stadiums and probably win the champions League in one of those stadiums because those teams won't be able to do it only Chelsea can do it while them hahaha
Chelsea winning UCL? what a joke[Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
Jukabkmprz
0
Chelsea is like a man with two wive today his with this woman tomorrow with another woman it has sticked to 11 and 10 position since last season
Jumachelsea
0
So Chelsea will be sleeping in the streets of London for 6 years, begging for food and blankets from Arsenal, Fulham, Spurs, West ham, Palace, Brentford,...[Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
at least they're going to make famous one of those teams stadiums and probably win the champions League in one of those stadiums because those teams won't be able to do it only Chelsea can do it while them hahaha
Richardoghale
0
how can a brainless club like gunners occupy the first position for two seasons and still bottle the premier league,wow u guys are fantastic totenham pro
Bro you are right , ur club is just Tottenham pro max
yutcklpstu
1
So Chelsea will be sleeping in the streets of London for 6 years, begging for food and blankets from Arsenal, Fulham, Spurs, West ham, Palace, Brentford,...[Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
Zakclmpuz
1
Why a 60,000 seater? After two decades, this one will appear smaller and they will again start thinking of expanding it.Just construct a 80,000 seater and forget about stadium expansion for the next century.Museum United have a 78,000 seater and you won't hear them complaining about their stadium size for the next millennium.🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴
Makhaye29
1
One thing is for sure a decision has to be made because every other big club are building better stadium and Chelsea needs to join the party also.
Pappywealth29
0
i advice them to go and buy land for another side so that they can escape from London derby against arsenal
[image]
I will advise arsenal make them go collect champions league so they can use it to compare to Chelsea in London
Vuudnpsuz
0
you want them to leave London so no one will use champions league to do shakara for una again.
tell them,
sahacdknry
1
i advice them to go and buy land for another side so that they can escape from London derby against arsenal
[image]
you want them to leave London so no one will use champions league to do shakara for una again.
wohdeinpst
1
This is the worst statement I had ever seen, how can you be pride of London yet for two seasons you can't cross 10th place on the EPL table?
[image]
with ur best form of ur arsenal history,u went trophless and you are here crying 😂😂😂
karaama3006
0
i advice them to go and buy land for another side so that they can escape from London derby against arsenal
[image]
who arsinal
perebi
1
i advice them to go and buy land for another side so that they can escape from London derby against arsenal
malablata
0
how many seasons arsenal goes without fighting for a trophy? no problem. Chelsea and arsenal will meet before the end of this season and surely it will be the end of your title race.
Looka, just hope we don't help to relegate you
ElagoTomas
0
That's what renting can do. You don't have your own stadium then you went wasting money on musical gangster rappers to come play football....... Mumu club.
how many seasons arsenal goes without fighting for a trophy? no problem. Chelsea and arsenal will meet before the end of this season and surely it will be the end of your title race.
Kattyranking
0
This is the worst statement I had ever seen, how can you be pride of London yet for two seasons you can't cross 10th place on the EPL table?
[image]
how can a brainless club like gunners occupy the first position for two seasons and still bottle the premier league,wow u guys are fantastic totenham pro
ElagoTomas
0
This is the worst statement I had ever seen, how can you be pride of London yet for two seasons you can't cross 10th place on the EPL table?
[image]
Chelsea achieved some success in Europe that some London team failed to achieve. if arsenal or Tottenham could win any European trophy one day, the they could be pride of London as well. Chelsea's 1st champions league triumph was tough looking at the team they defeated. Napoli, Barcelona, and Bayern Munich. 2021 in Porto they played against a strongest team in Europe, Manchester City. the won.
malablata
0
This is the useless comment I have read from this app. How can u be gunners and for 20 years you have never won epl and for your entire history u have never won ucl
Cross the 10th position first then you can form an argument....😂😂😂
Wuaadpstuz
0
playing like ur homeless
Diuablnsty
0
U see useless people like u follow useless club like arsenal. A club that has never won ucl. A common that faced Chelsea in europa final and was completely trashed like the way u are trashed in thinking
Arsenal has more trophies then Chelsea a richer history with or without champions League and we fighting for the title you guys are fighting with Everton and United for 10th place
Dutiknostz
0
I sympathize with chealsea big club with a rented stadium.
Ducabikpu
0
That's what renting can do. You don't have your own stadium then you went wasting money on musical gangster rappers to come play football....... Mumu club.
U see useless people like u follow useless club like arsenal. A club that has never won ucl. A common that faced Chelsea in europa final and was completely trashed like the way u are trashed in thinking
Ducabikpu
2
This is the worst statement I had ever seen, how can you be pride of London yet for two seasons you can't cross 10th place on the EPL table?
[image]
This is the useless comment I have read from this app. How can u be gunners and for 20 years you have never won epl and for your entire history u have never won ucl
Thecloud
1
Chelsea are Homeless before They are Used to It So don't worry
stambulielia11
1
What's here to checkout. Open organization and ownership, screenshot and send here, I will know you are serious...... 😂😂😂
You are serious man
malablata
1
Check this out
[image]
What's here to checkout. Open organization and ownership, screenshot and send here, I will know you are serious...... 😂😂😂
Webcmopuy
1
This club was finished when they forced Roman out of it
stambulielia11
0
Just check Google and Chelsea is renting Stanford Bridge for matches
Check this out
malablata
0
Go check for your self on Google if I say it you won't believe it
Just check Google and Chelsea is renting Stanford Bridge for matches
Taadeilmoy
0
you are nothing at Chelsea fc poor owner worst owner Brighton coach again at Chelsea fc poor owner worst owner is a problem at Chelsea fc
stambulielia11
0
You who know about it, tell us.
Go check for your self on Google if I say it you won't believe it
malablata
0
You don't know anything about the Stadium just keep quite
You who know about it, tell us.
stambulielia11
1
That stadium is not for Chelsea, they are renting
You don't know anything about the Stadium just keep quite
malablata
5
This is the worst statement I had ever seen, how can you be pride of London yet for two seasons you can't cross 10th place on the EPL table?
malablata
0
Great news expansion is very necessary for a much better revenue for club
That stadium is not for Chelsea, they are renting
malablata
1
That's what renting can do. You don't have your own stadium then you went wasting money on musical gangster rappers to come play football....... Mumu club.
sepabdeiou
3
Great news expansion is very necessary for a much better revenue for club