Chelsea are in the process of discussing the possibility of breaking ground on a new stadium at Earls Court instead of renovating Stamford Bridge, according to reports.
The west London club has looked to redevelop their longstanding home and increase their ground's capacity for a number of years, with plans renewing in earnest following the 2022 takeover of the club by co-controlling owners Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital.
A full-scale refurbishment of their current stadium is believed to be the club's first choice, with Chelsea completing the £80million purchase of the homes of 100 military veterans on a neightbouring site in April.
The purchase of the land was at the time described as 'a significant step towards ensuring the long-term financial sustainability of the club' by CEO Jason Gannon - but it has by no means assured Chelsea of staying on their current footprint.
As per the Guardian, the club has been entertaining the alternative option of a move one mile due north to Earls Court.
Discussions are said to have been held between the club and Transport for London (TfL), one of the partners who looks after the site, and real estate developers Delancey.
But a major fly in the ointment are the wishes of the Earls Court Development Committee, who are set to bring their masterplan for redevelopment of the site to Hammersmith and Fulham and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea councils later this week.
Their plan is not said to include a football stadium and if approved, Chelsea will be forced to go back to the drawing board.
However, Chelsea's hope of a convenient move to the new site could be kept alive if the councils turn the proposition down - which could prompt the club to present their own plan for the area including a multi-use football stadium at the site's Lillie Bridge depot and the possibility of more affordable housing in the area.
If the ECDC are not succesful in their presentation of the master plan, Chelsea are thought to be expecting to pay £500million for Earls Court.
Factors including the complexity of the work needed to increase capacity and upgrade Stamford Bridge are behind the Premier League side looking into other options.
One of the biggest stumbling blocks is Stamford Bridge's proximity to the tube line and Fulham Broadway station, and the club would likely face a stand-by-stand renovation which could keep them at a temporary home for several years.
Twickenham, Wembley, and nearby Craven Cottage - the ground belonging to Premier League rivals Fulham - have all been mooted as possible short-term homes.
But while talkes have been positive between the club, the TfL and Delancey, internal trouble in west London could yet provide further stumbling blocks in Chelsea's pursuit of a revamped ground.
The relationship between Boehly and Clearlake figurehead Behdad Eghbali has reportedly become strained in recent months, with the co-controlling owners clashing over a number of flashpoints including the post-season sacking of head coach Mauricio Pochettino.
Both Boehly and Clearlake are believed to be interested in buying the other out of their partnership, but Mail Sport previously revealed that the latter entity has no intention of selling their stake.
Clearlake are majority shareholders with 61.5 per cent, while Boehly splits the remaining 38.5 per cent with two other investors.
MogastyJn
3
Whatever, we’re in 💙. Once a blue , always a blue
Tupbeior
0
stamford bridge is not for chelsea fc how can they built or renovate a rented stadia
go back to your primary school and learn
sammyluv84
0
So Chelsea wants to build Stanford Road since Stanford Bridge is Broken
[image]
No, Stamford sea 😢
AFervpkM5251
0
stamford bridge is not for chelsea fc how can they built or renovate a rented stadia
Most of em are blinded with the rumor they see or heard online
Rickk
0
stamford bridge is not for chelsea fc how can they built or renovate a rented stadia
🍾
MUTALJr
4
So Chelsea wants to build Stanford Road since Stanford Bridge is Broken
Zohailmrsy
2
stamford bridge is not for chelsea fc how can they built or renovate a rented stadia
well sorry to be disappointed, the stadium belongs to Chelsea FC, as a CFC fan you can but a share from the CFC official website site. BackStory: CFC gave the fans some money to buy the stadium, (due to realeaste issue), in return the fans are going to have the stadium for 100 yrs during which CFC is going to be paying rental fees to CFC, and in return, any money generate from the stadium will be use in paying the balance the fans owns CFC. NB: You need to be a CFC registered members and card holder to buy share from the stadium. (I even bought 100k share 2 yrs ago) You not a CFC fan so I don't expect you to know all this
jueailmrst
1
stamford bridge is not for chelsea fc how can they built or renovate a rented stadia
Vector_Vector
1
how about fix ur transfer strategy first and focus on the field performance . these Chelsea owners don't care about the fans at all .
JijangaUtdfan
0
100000 capacity please
🤣🤣💀
Nuueknpru
5
Please let it be 100.000 thousand capacity or even more self and please let it be Morden stadium 🏟️ so that we the fan can enjoy our beloved Chelsea once again, God please touch their hearts
Vohalopryz
2
100000 capacity please
yasbeiknop
0
the project is good enough thanks
yasbeiknop
0
always insult where are you come from
Dexjnr
0
nonsense club
U call urself a chelsea fan yet u insult them fool
Kelvin_Iyke_Blues
4
It's High time we come to terms with reality that Football club owners are business oriented pple. This Chelsea owners are not different but the issue is they don't know anything about football. So buying the club and running affairs is in their hands. It's not owned by CFC fan base or the city. So just support the team if you want and stop sulking 🤔
Jafick
1
nonsense club