The oddest thing about Chelsea's transfer ban is that it has been sparked by a player who featured in just 16 games for their first-team — Bertrand Traore.
The Burkina Faso winger moved to Lyon in summer 2017 for £8.8million and, barring a first-refusal clause and a 15 per cent sell-on fee, that should have been his last involvement at Chelsea.
But Friday's news that the Stamford Bridge side have been hit with a two window ban means Traore is a topic of conversation again.
FIFA's investigation into Chelsea's transfer business — which has resulted in a ban for the summer and winter windows, pending Chelsea's appeal — was caused by the circumstances surrounding Traore's move to Stamford Bridge.
Their regulations state there are only three situations in which a player under the age of 18 can move internationally.
The first is if a player's parents move for non-footballing reasons. Another is if they are within the EU, and the last involves proximity to a border.
None of those would have applied to Traore. Given he officially signed for Chelsea in January 2014, when he was 18, that did not seem to be an issue.
However, there had long been confusion over whether he was a Chelsea player. In 2010 there was a report in The Sun suggesting he had joined the academy from Auxerre, turning down Manchester United.
And in an interview in 2011, he insisted the deal was not done but said: 'I want to play in the first team for Chelsea, I want to play the European Champions League with the big names.
'I want to play every match for Chelsea and in the future I want to become the best player in Africa and maybe Europe also.'
Chelsea also moved to clear up the situation in January 2012. They insisted he had not signed for them. They suggested he had played once for them as a trialist earlier in the season.
That came against Arsenal in October 2011, at the age of 16, when he was supposedly on a six-week trial.
Traore then played in a pre-season friendly with the first-team against the Singha All Stars in July 2013.
His signing was then confirmed by Chelsea on October 31, 2013 — after he had turned 18 — with the deal going through at the start of January 2014.
It might not be as simple as that. It has instead been alleged that they signed him at the age of 16, which Chelsea have always denied.
Recent claims have suggested they agreed to pay Traore's mother £154,000 to sign him from AJE Bobo-Dioulasso, with £13,000 going to the club.
Traore also allegedly spent two years living in Wimbledon and attending the £20,000 per year private school Whitgift. Former Chelsea player Colin Pates is the head of football there.
It is also alleged that club officials asked journalists not to report on Traore's presence when he travelled with Chelsea for pre-season in 2013.
FIFA also discovered that Traore had played 25 games for Chelsea at youth and senior level before being registered and the club allegedly sent an email to the governing body in 2011 regarding the option over Traore.
After he signed, Traore took 17 months to get a work permit and spent time on loan at Vitesse Arnhem while waiting for it.
He eventually broke into Chelsea's first-team in 2015-16. Traore scored four goals before moving to Ajax on loan and eventually to Lyon.
Aside from Chelsea activating his first-refusal, that should have been the end of his influence at Stamford Bridge.
Now the signing of Traore could define the next 12 months for the Blues — and what happens for even longer down the line.
muyabcimpt
0
As long as we keep hazard and hudson odoi we are good. Pulisic comes in.. No worries
No more hopes for a, top four so is, better Europa should be an option of guarantee what about difenders
Abukembo22
0
We should bring him back
vekbelpuz
0
Transfer ban relates to registering players for 2019-20 season. Those players aren't registered to Chelsea in 2018-19 & therefore can't be registered for new season. Players can be bought & players on loan can return but CANT be registered. It's how the ban works.
wrong
Edmunder
0
Couldnt get away with signing just about every young player out there and loaning them out just as fast.
Ellenmed
1
As long as we keep hazard and hudson odoi we are good. Pulisic comes in.. No worries
Everley
1
Banging on about 40 players on loan think that's the problem right there. Never get a chance in 1st team great youth policy. Hope you appeal,.lose, it and get 3 window ban.
Galalook
0
Chelsea have about 30/40 players out on loan... that's 2 squads on top of what we already have! Sarri will be gone and then Chelsea will have a manager who will pick a squad out of 50/60 odd players.... not even that Chelsea will appeal the ban and will be able to sign in summer
oiiopps
2
What a good move by Fifa. Great time for CHO, Mount, Ampadu, RLC, Christensen, Gallagher and Gilmour to break into first time forever.
Colbourner
0
Ban will take place from end of this season. The appeal will be heard before then. Only reason Barca got to sign players was because they weren't informed til April & it was the first case. CAS hasn't yet overturned a single ban & the 29 players affected now have to quit chelsea
CdKeyb
1
Transfer ban relates to registering players for 2019-20 season. Those players aren't registered to Chelsea in 2018-19 & therefore can't be registered for new season. Players can be bought & players on loan can return but CANT be registered. It's how the ban works.
Erlang
2
Wenger is going to join us, bring all the loan players back and win the league for years to come with an average squad of age of 23yrs old lol
aozao
1
Chelsea have an entire loan army they can recall. 😬
Wesboluck
1
It's a blessing in disguise, Chelsea will be forced to give youth players a chance
inkabisst
0
Ok we got Callum and Amapdu. They could be world class but we can’t compete for the title for a while.
Glennbrown
0
Honestly if we get a transfer ban for this and Man City and PSG go free after breaking countless rules it’s disgusting
oldest
0
I still remember being told by Chelsea he was definitely not a Chelsea player when Burkina Daso named their squad for the 2012 Africa Cup of Nations...
yeteikmpty
1
enerstina d
Kocdiopsz
0
it was a bad decision made by fifa in reality psg was to be banned for 10yrs buying player's in unabnormal way and what of mabbpe was bought at what age from Monaco