Chelsea will not be able to break ground a potential redevelopment of Stamford Bridge until at least 2027, according to reports.
Wednesday saw the completion of the club's purchase of the Sir Oswald Stoll Mansions just over six months after agreeing the £80million sale with the charity in October of last year.
The buildings currently house 100 military veterans, and negotiations over the sale have been ongoing due to concerns from the residents over where they will move to should the deal go through.
But while uncertainty remains over whether Chelsea's ownership group BlueCo will relocate to a new site altogether in lieu of renovations at their current ground, this week's purchase has boosted the possibility of the proposed £2billion upgrades going ahead.
Despite acquiring the land necessary for potential expansion, Blues supporters should not expect progress to be swift - regardless of whether they stay at their ground or move elsewhere.
As per the Evening Standard, Chelsea are not set to take possession of the site on which the flats are built until 2027, due to the need to rehouse their current occupants during the leaseback period.
Stoll's CEO Will Campbell-Wroe confirmed that the charity has found new accomodation a 'seven minute's walk' from the apartments and that after months of discussions, they have 'a lot of happy residents'.
'We chose Chelsea partly because they have been helpful and supportive,' Will Campbell-Wroe said. 'We have been next to Chelsea for 100 years and hope to be for the next 100 years. Both Stoll and Chelsea understood the moral obligation, and we are keen to build out that relationship. It is a long-term community relationship as well as the commercial transaction.'
'We met every single resident for over an hour, I met 30 about myself and we thought what we might want for our families. They wanted somewhere close by where they could all live as a community where we can look after and continue looking after them.
'We have been doing this for over 100 years and we knew we couldn't keep the building going for another 100 years so we needed to find another building,' he continued. 'Over the last six months, we've been looking for that good quality accommodation close to the Stoll Mansions site.
'We have found that half a mile away, seven minute's walk away where everyone can move together on a flagship site on the Old Kings Road. We feel we have a lot of happy residents now we have found the right solution in the end.'
The time delay gives the club ample time to decide on its future home, with a full stadium rebuild, stand-by-stand redevelopment, and a new site all still in the balance.
Should Chelsea plump to renovate their existing west London home, however, elements of the Sir Oswald Mansions would have to be integrated into the design, due to the building's Grade II-listed status.
Stoll are also set to retain 20 flats on site for the retired veterans who have served in conflicts in Korea, Northern Ireland, and Afghanistan.
With news of the sale going through, the club's COO James Gannon said that the club were 'delighted to increase our footprint at Stamford Bridge'.
'(The sale takes) a significant step towards ensuring the long-term financial sustainability of the club,' he added.
'We appreciate the opportunity to work with Stoll throughout a competitive tender process and we are pleased to help ensure those veterans that wish to remain inside the Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham will be able to do so.'
Plans - which have been in the works on and off under the ownership of the Todd Boehly-led consortium and former owner Roman Abramovich - would see Stamford Bridge's current capacity of 41,000 raised to 60,000.
This would put Chelsea's stadium into the top six in the Premier League in terms of size, with only Manchester United, Tottenham, West Ham, Liverpool and Arsenal currently having grounds that can hold more matchgoers.
If the club was to plump for renovation, the Blues could expect to play away for up to four years, with Wembley, Twickenham, and Craven Cottage all floated as potential alternative stadia.
Boehly is believed to have held informal talks with Fulham's owner Shahid Khan about the possibility of groundsharing, but although representing the most convenient move just one mile down the road, a spell in Craven Cottage - capacity 25,700 - could see the Blues miss out on key revenue.
Should Chelsea's owners opt for a stand-by-stand refurbishment the work could take significantly longer than four to five years, and independent experts have called Chelsea's previously floated 2030 finish date 'optimistic'.
Pamdeoruz
0
I don't know why English leagues has bad structures of stadium's compared to Spain, Germany n the likes. how can a whole Chelsea of the world. our darling club. planning to put up a stadium with just 60000 capacity n the 6th in premier league.how? Tottenham stadium one of the best. can we also copy them? or even do it better. Barcelona is putting up a stadium n it ll be bigger than what we are thinking now. Chelsea is not just club now ooooo.its a religion. let's do it better. please whoever read this should forward to the managers. they should put up big stadium for a very long period
Not sure if we’d be able to fill it if it were 60k or more capacity - well at least not week in week out!
vehadklnt
0
I don't know why English leagues has bad structures of stadium's compared to Spain, Germany n the likes. how can a whole Chelsea of the world. our darling club. planning to put up a stadium with just 60000 capacity n the 6th in premier league.how? Tottenham stadium one of the best. can we also copy them? or even do it better. Barcelona is putting up a stadium n it ll be bigger than what we are thinking now. Chelsea is not just club now ooooo.its a religion. let's do it better. please whoever read this should forward to the managers. they should put up big stadium for a very long period
vehadklnt
0
in the near future,we will be there saying we need 80000 capacity stadium. why not put it up now? the club has a lot of supporters all over the world. how can we putting up new stadium and its coming to be 6th one. look at Madrid n Barcelona stadiums. that is standard. please let's do it better than what we planning now
Haudikmnos
1
Would this ever happen? Arsenal , Tottenham and West ham all got their new stadium without controversy and at record time. When I see big clubs in Spain and Germany and the size of stadium they play in, it gives impression that English football is more of noise making. The real thing is elsewhere.
Pehcdlmnrt
0
everything is falling apart building looks too old
Yacelrtyz
2
Chelsea! let's stand strong till we strive.
GodfreyDaniel
1
Later them go say non be Chelsea be the owner of the stadium 😐
vecabcky
1
We need to focus on the team for now on,not trying to renovate the standford bridge,
Taaacoptz
1
always late[Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]