Chelsea's Premier League rivals are questioning whether owner Roman Abramovich can act on his promise to write off the club's £1.5bn debt without breaking profit and sustainability rules.
Chelsea have been clear that he can but some clubs want the issue investigated, which could ultimately lead to a points deduction or the debt having to be repaid, complicating an already-complex transaction. The Premier League board would ultimately make the decision whether to charge the club.
The Premier League's Profit and Sustainability rules are its version of UEFA's Financial Fair Play rules, though far more generous. Premier League clubs can make losses of £105m over three years if the owners guarantee £90m worth of secure funding. But anything greater than that is subject to disciplinary action, which can results in a points penalty.
Leading football QC Nick De Marco, who acted for Newcastle United in the Saudi takeover, believes that the Premier League may have to take action, just as the English Football League did when QPR's owners tried to write off a much smaller debt to get round the Football League's Financial Fair Play rules. QPR ended paying a £20m in fines and legal costs.
Under current Premier League rules, the owners are only allowed to put in £90m over three years and anything in excess of that is treated as a debt. So, if Chelsea's owner had written off the £1.5billion debt it would likely then become a £1.5bn debt for Profit and Sustainability accounting purposes.
De Marco said: 'It may not be treated as debt for the purposes of an annual return under UEFA's Financial Fair Play or the Premier League's Profit and Sustainabilty rules. And large parts of the debt was entered into before Premier League or UEFA rules existed.
'If a club normally had a debt of £1.5bn it would obviously be in significant breach of those rules, and likely be subject to a substantial points deduction.
'However, what is the accounting treatment of writing off that debt? This was a direct issue in the QPR Financial Fair Play case.'
Bicabksy
1
Another stupid write up from a very funny journalist who thinks of nothing but their egos.
kenbikny
0
let's hope they get an owner
tell your owners to write off yours if you want. that you are lead by stingy owners shouldn't be our problems.
Nisdoruy
3
and by saying arrival clubs them in Manchester United and Liverpool which is no surprise but f*** them they're just jealous of us Blues for life
rodadrst
3
Another created storm in a tea cup that will amount to nothing as usual. Don't all these writers get tired of all the doom-mongering? They are so desperate for Chelsea to go down that they keep creating useless scenarios after another that have no merit. Anyway, they can continue dreaming about something that will never happen.
ManUnited-Red
0
not having one is still better than having Glazer s
they were better have to admit
zlatanibraimovic
1
I know this issue would arrived from the first day.
JoeBee64
0
not having one is still better than having Glazer s
Yes, you're right not having any is far better than having Glazers like useless Man U.
-Scooby-
3
let's hope they get an owner
not having one is still better than having Glazer s
ManUnited-Red
2
let's hope they get an owner