Towards the end of Der Spiegel's expose of Manchester City is a moment of rich comedy. 'This is exactly what Bayern Munich president Uli Hoeness means when he complains that Abu Dhabi only has to open up the oil spigots to be able to afford expensive players,' the magazine declares solemnly.
This is Hoeness, who, at his trial in 2014, admitted evading €28.5million in taxes, was found guilty of seven serious counts of tax fraud and sentenced to prison for three and a half years. This is the guy we're going to listen to sermonising about financial propriety? Come on, at least Dick Turpin wore a mask, as they say in Manchester.
If Manchester City cooked the books, as their accusers claim, it was because the established elite clubs, in league with UEFA, came up with a self-serving, protectionist scam called Financial Fair Play.
It was hijacked from its original course and turned into a means of raising the drawbridge on the rest of football so that owner investment became close to illegal, and nobody could catch those already in front.
Had football gone along as before, the Manchester City project could have developed gradually, built over time, as football clubs do. It was this new ruling that created the imperative to fast-track the investment in the business, and also the need to be creative with numbers.
UEFA always suspected the sponsorships from Abu Dhabi were inflated and City were fined £50m — as were Paris Saint-Germain, who are backed by Qatar. These allegations claim to show the greater extent of that inflation, but it is hard to get too bothered by the successful rise of a club that has been very good for the English game: particularly now we know the alternatives.
FFP having worked its magic to the benefit of clubs such as Bayern Munich and Juventus, their leagues are dying. The motivation behind the European super league is that competitions and clubs on mainland Europe cannot compete with the Premier League. They are desperate for new revenue streams and do not care who or what they trample on to get them.
Any idea why no one wants to watch these leagues? Well, here are the last 10 Premier League winners: Manchester United, Chelsea, Manchester United, Manchester City, Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Leicester, Chelsea and Manchester City. Every year a change. It was 2009 when a club last retained the title in England, a wonderful, enthralling run.
And here are the last seven champions in Italy: Juventus, Juventus, Juventus, Juventus, Juventus, Juventus and Juventus. And the last six in Germany: Bayern Munich, Bayern Munich, Bayern Munich, Bayern Munich, Bayern Munich and Bayern Munich. Real Madrid and Barcelona, meanwhile, have split 13 of the previous 14 titles in Spain.
So, excuse those who find Manchester City's circumventing of some profoundly unfair and harmful rules the least of the problems with FFP.
Provided owner investment is a gift, not a loan, and does not have to be paid back, what is the issue?
Manchester City have made English football more open, more competitive. So have Chelsea and Roman Abramovich; so did Leicester.
Other clubs have had to raise their standards, from the academy to the first team. They have been at the forefront of youth football, of women's football, of local regeneration. They have ploughed millions into community projects, too.
Watching the display of emotion by Leicester fans at the weekend, thoughts turned to what other owner would be so revered by his own fans. There was only one: Sheik Mansour.
The evidence presented by Der Spiegel is powerful and may have longer-term ramifications if UEFA have the appetite to reopen their files, but FFP is a bankrupt notion, that has succeeded, as predicted, only in cementing the elite in place. An elite we now know will never be satisfied with the lion's share, that has been entering meetings, discussing breaking away from the rest of football.
And these are the clubs that will judge Manchester City's practices? And Uli Hoeness is the man they should be judged against? An entitled German crook? It is a fine lesson for us all.
Royjohn
0
Good articulation that makes sense, FFP is a big joke.
AliMonsur
0
i don't remember when was the last time I watched Bundesliga match.
SWEEPERKEEPER
0
We do understand competition! But never compare Leicestercity with mancity it was a minimal budget and sensational win .But spending a billion to achieve success is not called making it open .
It was a dream , but it is gone now . Leister is a mid table club and always going to be . Nothing wrong with that, but If you want to win multiple trophies and always stay on top You need money to cover your expensive wages and new signings. This is were sponsorship come to play !.
SWEEPERKEEPER
0
FFP should be scrapped or amended to protect Clubs from falling in debts not to protect the lion’s share of the so-called elite clubs .
egodfrey1
0
We do understand competition! But never compare Leicestercity with mancity it was a minimal budget and sensational win .But spending a billion to achieve success is not called making it open .
it's their money why are you complaining😂😂
memoria
0
Brilliant and objective article
hoisted
0
City = Abu Dhabi. Without Abu Dhabi, City sinks faster than a brick in a swimmimg pool. It's obscene.
ballstar
0
Financial fair play is actually hurting the smaller clubs. Some small clubs want to spend - in order to catch up with those that have everything - and they get in trouble when they do - Forest and QPR come to find. Yet the big clubs just keep spending.
wrapped
0
Finally, some balance from Mr Samuel. I really hope we did cook the books, because FFP is a joke
Jeremye
0
The whole FFP seems totally unfair, Southampton have sold many very good players to meet the FFP conditions, ho w is a team supposed to grow and compete,this is geared only for the wealthy clubs,furthermore what happens to the money they are fined,I believe Leicester paid £50,000,000 what happened to that money.
Fedora
0
We do understand competition! But never compare Leicestercity with mancity it was a minimal budget and sensational win .But spending a billion to achieve success is not called making it open .
Balcombe
0
An article I agree 100% with. I should add that the American owners of Man U and others will want a league whereby they can milk it forever....no relegation and lots of income.
John008
0
Worth repeating: "the real villain here is a self-serving scam called 'Financial Fair Play' "
Hesslertown
0
The essence of the article is absolutely spot on for me. I cannot bear the self fulfilling acts of those at the top of European football and how they have looked to 'barricade' themselves behind impenetrable walls of £££ at the expense of enthralling competition.
ham11official
0
uefa will investigate this but will not investigate the match between psg and barca 6-1 remember?, they have been in favour of the Spanish clubs for a long time now its Madrid,f*** fifa
Giz
0
Where do you live? When are you coming to Canada? I need to shake your hand! If EUFA were interested in having a much more ‘level playing field’ then they would have adopted a formula closer to the one used in the US so big team don’t always win or dominate. I’m not a fan of Us sports, just the system of allocating players entering the leagues/nhl,baseball, A-football etc.
fencing
2
Brilliant and objective article
boaainprs
1
well said thank u
Moduyz
1
Does UEFA and FA have the courage to demote MCFC to lower divisions because of this finding? Probably not. No principle for them. So just scrap the useless Financial Fair Play scheme.
Lilbaby✈️
1
I think uefa and fifa are telling each other bad jokes,they are scamming themselves and telling the world others did it
AnwarJemil
2
why they foces on big player & club they want to fornt pge big & bold headline news? that's not fair