Micah Richards says he "cannot understand" why referee Simon Hooper denied Manchester City a late one-on-one at the end of their thrilling 3-3 draw with Tottenham on Super Sunday.
With the fantastic game nearing its end, Erling Haaland played Jack Grealish through on goal for a one-on-one, but after giving an advantage for a foul on Haaland by Emerson Royal, referee Simon Hooper brought the play back as Grealish brought the ball down.
Referee Hooper felt the wrath of the Etihad Stadium crowd at the full-time whistle, with Haaland remonstrating with the officials and storming straight down the tunnel.
And Sky Sports pundit Richards could not hide his frustration at the call which could have granted City a winner.
"The referee had a brilliant game today until this moment. I don't understand it," said Richards.
"The referee puts the whistle to his mouth, he waves the play on to play advantage. Jack Grealish is clearly onside and Haaland plays the ball through - and then he stops the play, which I don't quite understand.
"The evidence is there for all to see, he should have let play go on. You can see on the fourth official's face, he knows the referee has made the mistake. How can you explain it?
"He's entitled to make a mistake - but the problem I have with that is how many situations have we seen where play is allowed to go on [so VAR can check it].
"If you're in doubt, just leave the play to go on and then you can bring it back."
Fellow pundit Roy Keane added: "The referee has made a mistake. It's a poor call, he's got it wrong.
"Grealish is through on goal and credit to him, he played advantage. But he's got that [the decision to bring it back] wrong. We can all see that.
"It's a poor decision, but City will be critical of themselves for letting Spurs off the hook. They can't look at the referee for that one."
Haaland's fury at the decision continued well after the full-time whistle.
Pep: I will not do a Mikel Arteta comment
Sharing footage on social media of Hooper giving advantage for the foul on the City striker, then bringing it back after Grealish ran through, Haaland posted on X: "Wtf".
When asked by Sky Sports about the decision, City manager Pep Guardiola said he would "not do a Mikel Arteta comment".
Guardiola was referencing the moment Arsenal manager Arteta - who used to work at City as Guardiola's assistant - calling the referees "embarrassing" and "a disgrace" after they allowed Newcastle to score a controversial winner against his Arsenal team on November 4.
"Next question. I will not do a Mikel Arteta comment," Guardiola said.
"It is hard when you review the image, the referee decides to blow the whistle after he has already said to play on. After the pass, the whistle, so I do not understand this action."
In his post-match press conference, Guardiola described Haaland's post-match reaction as "normal".
Ivanovich99
626
Man of the match
MickieMoses
394
All because of gambling Var was introduced, because of bets referees are now employed by the bets companies and placed on the peach, because of bets football is finished
Abuzmoonstruck
62
remember..!!?? This Simon cooper was the official between liverpool controversial loss against spurs
Hubacdktuz
48
Arteta is a man he isn't afraid
Iffy106
35
EPL referee's to Pep are like this
pesacers
28
Scores of coaches,players,referees,officials and supporters even stupid supporters know Arteta was right but can't admit it coz they are scared of penalties that will follow..Arteta is a genius, now the pain goes to those crowns who were on Arteta's neck for saying the truth.. it's funny seeing Man City supporters blaming the referee and match officials because they failed to beat the weak side,your tears make us happy..its your time now
themanfifa
10
Arteta is a man he isn't afraid
you just don't get it, pep referred to Arteta's comment for a reason. In short, he said what Arteta said without actually saying it. Therefore he can't get in trouble for it.