Numbers have been crunched to show how the Premier League table would have looked this season if there was no VAR, but Man City would still have won the league, according to reports.
All 20 Premier League clubs are set to vote next month on whether to keep VAR in place or scrap it following another season of controversial refereeing decisions and apologies being handed out by the PGMOL.
Plenty of players and managers have had their say on whether to continue with the video assistance technology or not and the conclusion of the Premier League season offers an alternative view of the table, as reported by The Sun.
If there had been no VAR in play this season then there would have been plenty of movement between clubs and their final standings, with Newcastle one of the team that would have been worse off.
While analysing every VAR intervention in Premier League matches over the course of the season, it has been revealed that Newcastle would have finished level on points with Chelsea, but their poorer goal difference would have dropped them to seventh.
Newcastle finished the campaign sixth and as it stands have a place in next season's Europa League competition, provided Manchester United don't beat Man City in the upcoming FA Cup final.
However, despite VAR's numerous interventions this season, there would have been no change in the final positions of the Premier League's top five.
Man City would still have gone on to beat Arsenal to the title and record a fourth consecutive top-flight crown, while Liverpool and Aston Villa would have remained third and fourth respectively.
However, Arsenal would have been one point closer to City which could have made for an even tighter end to the season.
Tottenham would have kept their fifth-place finish but would have finished four points less than their final tally 66 if VAR hadn't been in place.
Meanwhile, Manchester United would still have found themselves eighth during a disastrous second season for Erik ten Hag even if VAR hadn't gone against them in some matches.
Wolves would have jumped one place in the league up to 13th under the revised rules, while West Ham, Crystal Palace, Bournemouth and Brighton would also have finished the season with more points.
Luton, Burnley and Sheffield United would have still been relegated under the revised standings, however, the Hatters would only be going down on goal difference rather than the six points Nottingham Forest finished above them.
Despite Forest being one of VAR's biggest critics this season, they would have been three points worse off if the technology hadn't been in place.
Cihacnru
275
Liverpool would have won the premier league
Rucdeknot
11
Who ever wrote this is liverpool would have won this title with 8+ points clear...even premier league declared that before the season,liverpool wer denied a penalties against man.city second leg,Arsenal first leg,Man utd first leg,chelsea first leg,against Spurs ruled out Diaz's goal first leg,against Westham referee Anthony Taylor stopped Gapko from scoring after from goalkeeper's mistake second leg,etc...so VAR was more against liverpool than any other team in the premier league like 35% above other teams...Reason being they didn't want liverpool fc to equal up titles with their beloved club Man.utd cause everytime liverpool fc is about to get there...they do their dirty work in cameras and behind the cameras and stop liverpool fc from getting there...