There is a myth about Newcastle fans that they would rather lose 5-4 than win 1-0.
It was a fiction repeated by Richard Keys on Sunday afternoon, the former Sky Sports presenter claiming that Sam Allardyce would have been ‘hammered’ if he set up his Newcastle side with five at the back, just as Rafa Benitez had done for the visit of Chelsea.
Keys, by way of context, is currently involved in a daily dispute with the Toon Army over his defence of owner Mike Ashley, and it is perhaps the case that he was deliberately trying to antagonise.
Either way, the notion has long since existed that to defend from the off against a team of superior quality is not the Newcastle way.
In short, it is nonsense. There is not a fanbase in the land who would rather lose a match in style than win it ugly.
Think back to last season and the narrow one-goal victories over Manchester United and Arsenal when, on both occasions, Newcastle ceded possession to their visitors.
Benitez is a pragmatist and plays to the strengths - and weaknesses - of his side. He did not return a 10th-placed finish last season by sending his team on the offensive every week.
It is about using what he has to get the best for the football club, and supporters accept as much.
Allardyce’s problem was that, during his unhappy spell in charge of Newcastle 11 years ago, he was setting up that way with far better players than the ones currently at Benitez’s disposal.
As it was, Benitez’s side came within five minutes of a point against a Chelsea side who had scored six times in their opening two matches.
Followers of Huddersfield - soundly beaten 3-0 on the opening day - would no doubt wish they had stayed in the contest for as long.
And this was, it must be said, very different to the tactics employed by the Magpies against Manchester City last season.
On that occasion Benitez put 10 men behind the ball and showed no ambition to attack until the final 15 minutes, when they came very close to nicking a point as they trailed 1-0.
So while there will be criticism from elsewhere, it is important to remember that the game-plan against Chelsea - and City - very nearly worked. There was, for instance, no dissent from the terraces on full-time.
They trust Benitez in these parts, just as they mistrust anything from the mouth of Keys.
jaydlnpz
0
I now know how man city was feeling like when they played Chelsea last season.. man city all attack and Chelsea all defense
hm_killdeezy
0
mate that's according to you. Us man Utd fans enjoyed it. You lot (Chelsea fans) could think otherwise
😅😅 most Manchester United fans wished their team were playing the SARRIBALL But I'm sorry you have to continue packing the bus. If chelsea were able to board NEWCASTLE's bus, what stops us from boarding Man u bus
jowacdnotz
0
I believe it's true. You win anyway you have to. It's the three points that matters. Manchester united were second last season but thet didn't play nice or enjoyable football
mate that's according to you. Us man Utd fans enjoyed it. You lot (Chelsea fans) could think otherwise
hm_killdeezy
0
I believe it's true. You win anyway you have to. It's the three points that matters. Manchester united were second last season but thet didn't play nice or enjoyable football
Lozbloty
0
Chelsea is a big team, well done boys
shah2468
3
Should have been 2-0, the ref and linesman should have stopped the game after the elbow on Giroud. Newcastle lost and that's their own fault. They parked the bus, fouled as much as they could and created nothing. Well done Chelsea for not giving up.
yawhazard
1
such a busted game by Newcastle
banze
3
they really made chelsea suffer
Nesaiknruy
1
It explains that Newcastle likes to attack more than it likes to defend
The game was played in their half for like 80 minutes in their own back yard 😂
Nesaiknruy
2
Rondon looked like a lost cause up front cos he had to go 1 vs 4 since Newcastle put 9 men back 😅. Chelsea deserved the win for playing against 10 at the back
KapilBhavsar
0
well played ...
BAPPSPAULO
1
Newcastle really played well
babzy1910
1
Newcastle really put on a good fight...thanks to hazard penalty n own goal...the pressure is much for them yo concede such fouls...anyway sarriball has come to stay....up blues
Evans Onda
2
You have changed Unai Emery's word to Newcastle? its okay
frankieij
1
5-4? that was Rafa bus, but yet Sarri-ball inflated the tyres at the end
Abu-stuzMukanda1
0
I was a bit scared with what seemed to be an early injury to Hazard that kept him out of New Castle's 18 zone. But I'm now happy after full tym. Collecting three points against Stubborn and defensive Magpies isn't easy.
Abu-stuzMukanda1
0
I was a bit scared with what seemed to be an early injury to Hazard that kept him out of New Castle's 18 zone. But I'm now happy after full tym. Collecting three points against Stubborn and defensive Magpies.
MKMike
2
whichever way you play, hazard will taunt your defence
buju758
0
i rather lose 5-4 playing offensively than lose 1-0 (by parking the bus) i rather go down with a fight not like newcastle tho they took that to heart and knock giroud the fuck oht
Veeduu
3
5-4 ??? how .. new castke played with 9 defenders and 1 midfielder for the first 75 minutes.. soo much defensive they were .. how they should have score more goals??
OmniSlash
0
lol.. how they played . did you saw ?
I did but I'm talking about the fans here
Veeduu
0
It explains that Newcastle likes to attack more than it likes to defend
lol.. how they played . did you saw ?
CR7ICON
4
what's the difference ???? a lose is a lose...
Parthlm10
6
Parking the bus like mourinho . well done. You will end up being frustrated like Manchester united
OmniSlash
2
It explains that Newcastle likes to attack more than it likes to defend