Fulham saw Josh King's opener controversially ruled out by VAR against Chelsea before his side suffered a 2-0 defeat at Stamford Bridge.
King thought he had given his side the lead in the 21st minute when he cut inisde the box and tucked his effort into the bottom corner, only to see his celebrations cut short by referee Rob Jones.
Jones was instructed by Michael Salisbury on VAR to review footage of Rodrigo Muniz's contact with Trevoh Chalobah in the build up to King's goal.
Shortly before the 18-year-old was played through and raced into the Chelsea penalty area, Muniz had shielded the ball and stepped on the foot of Chalobah.
After reviewing the pitchside monitor, Jones addressed the Stamford Bridge crowd to confirm the goal had been disallowed due to the "careless challenge" made by Muniz on Chalobah.
"I do not think it is a foul, it should stand. I do not know where else the attacker can put his foot. He has taken a long time over this Rob [Jones]," said former Premier League referee Mike Dean on Soccer Saturday.
"Rob has been sucked in by the VAR [Michael Salisbury], he has just landed on his foot, which can only go in one place, it is a poor, poor call.
"The VAR should just stay out of it, it is not clear and obvious error, but he did not have the nerve to stick with the on-field decision, he panicked, it is just not a foul at all. I do not know anybody who would say that was a foul."
Sky Sports' Jamie Carragher labelled VAR "shocking" in the aftermath of the incident and it would become another talking point in the second half after Joao Pedro headed the hosts into the lead just before the break.
Chalobah was once again involved in the incident, this time seeing his shot blocked by the outstretched arms of Ryan Sessegnon inside the area, prompting another monitor check for the referee.
After a four-minute delay, with VAR also analysing a potential handball for Joao Pedro in the build-up and a foul from Moises Caicedo on Alex Iwobi, Chelsea were eventually awarded the penalty to double their lead through Enzo Fernandez.
"Correct call, there is a slight nudge [from Joao Pedro], not enough for a handball," Dean continued.
"But the ball is then reworked and the way he [Sessegnon] has made his arms bigger, it has to be a penalty kick."
Two goals with VAR at the root cause of both of them. For Fulham, it marked their first defeat of the season but as Silva's frustration on the touchline showed, it could have been completely different.
biwamopsu
0
TO BE HONEST VAR ARE FIXING MATCHES FOR BIG TEAMS IN ENGLAND
biwamopsu
0
It’s a shame for a true football fan to say, it was a correct call from VAR,,,,,,,it’s a total disgrace, nonsense That was a clear goal, VAR IS DESTROYING OUR BEAUTIFUL GAMES. And in most cases they’re more against the small teams, they don’t protect small teams Imagine that Second goal for Chelsea as a penalty, I’m not saying it’s not a penalty but why they couldn’t see the first handball that was committed by a Chelsea player and Fulham players clearly indicated it but the referee ignore it,,,,,and it end up given a penalty for another handball by a Fulham player. It’s totally unacceptable and the coach was fully right to feel bad because every decision was made was against his boys
Biodilmnyz
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
It pains you paaa 😃😀
Biodilmnyz
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
It pains you paaa 😀😃
KANYIRINGSUMA7
1
Fulham King is a local one. Chelsea King 👑 is super King 👑
KANYIRINGSUMA7
1
I don't know how controversial this is, you can't show skills at the expense of offending your opponent!
KANYIRINGSUMA7
0
this season both VAR and Referees will work for Chelsea. Chelsea is King of Football and you don't just toil with a King 👑 Maximum respect for FIFA 👑 King.
Fulham King is a fake King, the REAL KING 👑 IS CHELSEA itself.
Zemaknort
1
this season both VAR and Referees will work for Chelsea. Chelsea is King of Football and you don't just toil with a King 👑 Maximum respect for FIFA 👑 King.
Vooabdistu
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
It’s obvious you said you heard from your street fools because Chelsea never borrowed stadium from anyone Stamford Bridge is at Fulham Road. That’s what it means
Wosabrstz
0
now when someone committed foul it must not check with you people biased
Nickybluws
0
keep crying 😭😭..it's a foul on chalobah..when he's on the floor after being stamped, how is he supposed to defend leaving Fulham with only one center back to dribble and score..if it happens against your team you would want VAR to cancel the goal but because it's Chelsea, everybody wants VAR to close their eyes 👀..
exactly my point, the stamp was accidentally yes, but reckless and preventing the player to defend his goal. spot on by VAR
AFerusmc6546
0
Chelsea might win EPL this time because they have got good supporters both as VAR and Referee.
De play
Richardoghale
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
Your club is no match to my club, get that 🎯
Jekcdikloy
0
a foul was committed clearly. the pundits were just overly biased... even the second chelsea goal, the pundits tried to claim chelsea hand ball where clearly it wasn't a hand ball
yaccdkmnt
0
keep crying 😭😭..it's a foul on chalobah..when he's on the floor after being stamped, how is he supposed to defend leaving Fulham with only one center back to dribble and score..if it happens against your team you would want VAR to cancel the goal but because it's Chelsea, everybody wants VAR to close their eyes 👀..
Chelsea might win EPL this time because they have got good supporters both as VAR and Referee.
Ruubclouz
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
mumu if you don't know what to say can't you keep quiet
kayoh
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
funny coming from arsenal fan number 2 is waiting for at the end of the season.the was a foul there
SilverLightGlit
1
keep crying 😭😭..it's a foul on chalobah..when he's on the floor after being stamped, how is he supposed to defend leaving Fulham with only one center back to dribble and score..if it happens against your team you would want VAR to cancel the goal but because it's Chelsea, everybody wants VAR to close their eyes 👀..
They only hate to see Chelsea wining 😄😄
SilverLightGlit
2
These people are obsessed with Chelsea and are always deeply pained when Chelsea win. They will have high blood pressure if they continue like this
Mejibray
2
EPL is becoming a crap league with VAR and balless ref
fudademnsu
0
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys
you're the cow, nothing like Chelsea renting anyone's STADIUM, Google and understand the real ownership of Stamford Bridge.
Bidbeimnpy
0
may EPL will punish ref.
wenbimnpt
2
keep crying 😭😭..it's a foul on chalobah..when he's on the floor after being stamped, how is he supposed to defend leaving Fulham with only one center back to dribble and score..if it happens against your team you would want VAR to cancel the goal but because it's Chelsea, everybody wants VAR to close their eyes 👀..
tapikorsy
3
Mike Dean, it does not matter where Muniz’s foot is meant to land, it should never have been there in the first place! Also, why aren’t you talking about the fact that King also appeared to be offside when receiving the pass that led to the “goal”? It is punditry like this that makes football controversial and appear to be biased. Stamping on any player is a foul - period! Does not matter where the opponents foot is meant to land!
Tepcnrst
2
poor referees decision again cosst Fulham..they should take their stadium from those rent cow boys