i understand liverpool, united and chelsea trying to ban city from UCL but why Arsenal who is not even in top 6?? [Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
raadilrs
246
2020-03-25 16:17
Fair play is a rule that has come to stay. and any club that doesn't respect that must be punished.
BarryLama
141
2020-03-25 15:12
Don’t imagine Champions League without the Citizens
PaulDebby
127
2020-03-26 00:48
this news is fake! it is not true! why would these teams team up against city especially when it was just UEFA that prescribed the ban, & the case is in court? who is to benefit from this move? what exactly do the teams have in common against city? even if it's domination of the league, why would they opt to fight city in Europe? since the absence of football where fans argue for fun, AF has seen this one as a headline that will attract traffic. Even the dumbest fan knows that action is usually stayed on a matter in court. some fans may not understand this: city football has come to stay in England. give them 10 yrs champions league absence, there are still quality players that will accept city based on salary they will receive. I bet that after pep, nagelssman will be the next coach. city is building an empire that you cannot just wish away. I even think that the ban will help city to more domestic domination. do not forget, Juventus was in this condition, AC Milan & as it stands these European power houses cannot even flex the financial muscle that city can. so it doesn't matter even if the remaining 19 teams stand together against city. CITY HAS COME TO DOMINATE!
bluesss
541
i understand liverpool, united and chelsea trying to ban city from UCL but why Arsenal who is not even in top 6?? [Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]
raadilrs
246
Fair play is a rule that has come to stay. and any club that doesn't respect that must be punished.
BarryLama
141
Don’t imagine Champions League without the Citizens
PaulDebby
127
this news is fake! it is not true! why would these teams team up against city especially when it was just UEFA that prescribed the ban, & the case is in court? who is to benefit from this move? what exactly do the teams have in common against city? even if it's domination of the league, why would they opt to fight city in Europe? since the absence of football where fans argue for fun, AF has seen this one as a headline that will attract traffic. Even the dumbest fan knows that action is usually stayed on a matter in court. some fans may not understand this: city football has come to stay in England. give them 10 yrs champions league absence, there are still quality players that will accept city based on salary they will receive. I bet that after pep, nagelssman will be the next coach. city is building an empire that you cannot just wish away. I even think that the ban will help city to more domestic domination. do not forget, Juventus was in this condition, AC Milan & as it stands these European power houses cannot even flex the financial muscle that city can. so it doesn't matter even if the remaining 19 teams stand together against city. CITY HAS COME TO DOMINATE!