In the days when the world's best football teams did not possess lavish squads, you took your chances when making nationalist gestures.
Paul Gascoigne took a very big risk when mimicking a flute player in a Loyalist band during a 1998 Old Firm derby. The IRA issued death threats, the Scottish FA issued a £40,000 fine - and Gascoigne played on.
They were different times. Liverpool can well afford to do without the hassle and leave Xherdan Shaqiri behind as they travel to Red Star Belgrade's Marakana stadium in Serbia on Tuesday night.
They want to remove any prospect of reprisals for the player mimicking the eagle in the flag of his native Albania after scoring for Switzerland in the World Cup to defeat Serbia, against whom his compatriots fought a war of independence.
Liverpool's move is not one Shaqiri has asked for. He wanted to play. It was not a decision he had a say in. 'He accepts and understands this,' Jurgen Klopp said on Tuesday.
It is Liverpool's loss, because one of the under-appreciated points about Shaqiri's controversial gesture during his adoptive nation's 2-1 win in Kaliningrad is that it came in response to dog's abuse from Serbia supporters.
He'd been booed every time his face appeared on the stadium's big screen and every time he touched the ball. He left the field with a thumbs up to the Serbia fans, walking tall — all 5ft 7in of him.
Liverpool's decision sets a precedent which does not help football, either. Two weeks ago, Red Star general manager Zvezdan Terzic stirred the pot by publicly warning the player of the hostile welcome he'd receive in Belgrade.
'Shaqiri will undergo extraordinary psychological pressure,' Terzic said.
'He knows where he will be going. I do not know if he will be willing to play in the Marakana under these conditions. So I doubt he'll come. If he comes, he'll be smaller than a poppy seed.'
This was the reckless rabble-rousing of a club apparatchik using politics to extract an advantage and leave Liverpool without a player who would have arrived in Belgrade on a mission.
There has been no intelligence on any identifiable threat against Shaqiri. Neither has there been orchestrated chanting about the player in the weeks ahead of tonight's match, says respected Serbian journalist Milos Markovic, though anthems of abuse towards rival players are not a part of Serbia's terrace culture.
The prospect of missiles being thrown on Tuesday night is also remote. Red Star have been warning fans that the club are under intense UEFA scrutiny and risk hefty fines and possible bans for the slightest misconduct. They are already under UEFA sanction for bad behaviour while reaching the group stage.
But the idiots have won. Far from removing the political element and making 'the focus on a great game of football, free from anything else', as Klopp put it, the decision has accentuated the politics. No prizes for guessing what dominated Monday night's press conference in the stadium.
We may see the elite clubs — so desperately risk-averse in the sanitised space football now occupies — leave players behind more often in such circumstances.
Those decisions have been based on identifiable terror threats in the past. The six Chelsea players who didn't travel to Israel to face Hapoel Tel Aviv in 2001 were concerned about the security situation.
Liverpool's move follows Arsenal's decision to leave behind Henrikh Mkhitaryan when playing last month in Azerbaijan, who've long been in a state of war and diplomatic tension with his native Armenia.
There was a celebratory tone in some sections of the Serbian press as Liverpool's decision came through yesterday. 'Afraid, isn't he?' one outlet immediately stated. You imagine that Shaqiri will be spitting blood.
He seems closer to the Graeme Souness philosophy of playing in dangerous places. The Scot did not think twice about travelling to Dinamo Bucharest in 1984, two weeks after breaking club captain Lica Movila's jaw in two places in a European Cup first leg at Anfield.
Army troops made cut-throat gestures to Souness as the squad entered the stadium. Mark Lawrenson said later that he avoided standing anywhere near Souness during that second leg. Liverpool won 2-1. Souness was man of the match.
ODS
0
If the host yeam can't protect all players in top Europe competition why then UEFA allow Serbian team to compete. Gesture of Shaqiri can not be compred with thousands of killed innocent Kosovars by Serbian forces whos bodies were secretly transported with frigerator trucks near Belgrade to be dumped in river Danube, in the lake Perucac or in mass graves.
That’s a retarded, All teams can’t Control the atmosphere if the same happened in this scenario, don’t even talk about that war, All parties Were criminals.
AlfieThomasLFC
0
[image]
mane in mid?
Wumbmouz
0
jurgen klopp is wise not to bring shaqiri for the game...does not want to stir up any dissent and disrupt the flow of Liverpool game..also not to endanger the lives of Liverpool supporters who are there...after all it is a game of football and sportsmanship is important..klopp is a wise coach in whom we can trust him to do great things for the club...remember this is not only a club, this is family..!!! YNWA..
Fresh Pepper
1
Its a good decision... They can't risk that... He needs to discipline himself Few days ago He was asking for more respect cos of what He as accomplished in the past They don't ask for such... It will be given to you
fucabdmosy
1
It's a must win game for the Reds we got PSG and Napoli remaining. Hard games. I think Klopp should have thrown caution to the wind and played him
Caeiklopy
2
If the host yeam can't protect all players in top Europe competition why then UEFA allow Serbian team to compete. Gesture of Shaqiri can not be compred with thousands of killed innocent Kosovars by Serbian forces whos bodies were secretly transported with frigerator trucks near Belgrade to be dumped in river Danube, in the lake Perucac or in mass graves.
Soadens
0
man it was posted by mistake
bummer. yeah I didn't take it seriously as it isn't even complete. they really should add a delete your own comment option on here
Anoop_Singh_229
0
two midfielders in defense? have you learned nothing from man u? lol
man it was posted by mistake
Soadens
0
[image]
two midfielders in defense? have you learned nothing from man u? lol
Jopdkortz
0
winning is all that matters
attahshadrack
0
we also thank Shaq he understood the coach.Go hard liver
jasbcdsuy
1
Please rest Van Dijk... play Lovern and Gomez as center back...
Buhcdor
0
Best Xxi
this team is enough to beat Red star. we should keep an eye on sundays game against fulham also..bcoz we cannot drop points against them especially as city is playing united. Subs ;- mignolet , lovren , keita , alexander arnold , mane , firmino.
Buhcdor
0
liverpool even without shaqiri have a very good squad to beat Red Star Belgrade comfortably
Allisson , Clyne , Matip , Van DIjk , RObbo , fabinho , wijnaldum , lallana , sturridge , origi , salah. Subs :- Mignolet , Lovren , Milner , Alexander Arnold , Mane , Firmino. This team should comfortably beat them. we should not call our entire best starting 11 bcos.. we cannot afford to drop any points against fulham as city face united there is slight chance that city could drop points.
Likacruy
1
but its true i understand the situation
Anoop_Singh_229
0
Rekdnstuyz
1
How many goals should we score them
I will
vupeikmnr
1
liverpool even without shaqiri have a very good squad to beat Red Star Belgrade comfortably
Best Xxi
zucdilmn
0
Very sad but he perform great things to
zucdilmn
3
How many goals should we score them
Kamabdimpu
0
Shaq may have scored, carried on by emotion may have signaled the eagle again. great decision by Klopp, better safe than risk esp when depth is not an issue.
Wazacilstu
0
YNWA NEVER DIES
Buhcdor
1
liverpool even without shaqiri have a very good squad to beat Red Star Belgrade comfortably
Dimetri22
0
Liverpool made good decision by omitting him from squad. We don't want any unrest during mAtch. Red Belgrade have history of hostile atmosphere. Shaqiri presence could turn those idiots more wild. So good for team as well player no to play this match.
navin1784
0
its a good decision by klopp not that hes afraid but hes just making sure things dont go out of control from his end..shaq is a champ and a outstanding player what he does inside the arena may be offending to some but he does that for a reason...way to go Liverpool anyways u will win with just 10 players on the field so y give those nuts a reason to misbehave...YNWA
joyabcmopr
2
not a good move, shaq should play
DeAtHbOy
0
they are handling Shaqiri like they handled sturridge last season !!
SINGAM23
3
Two weeks ago, Red Star general manager Zvezdan Terzic stirred the pot by publicly warning the player of the hostile welcome he'd receive in Belgrade. 'Shaqiri will undergo extraordinary psychological pressure,' Terzic said. (WELL... THESE QUOTES DOWN HERE IS JUST FOR YOU, MR ZVEZDAN TERZIC)
uromama54
1
very, very sad when politics rule sport. what a shame!! [pumpkin][pumpkin][pumpkin]
Mezdklyz
0
Good decision by Klopp. Anyway I believe Liverpool has the quality to overcome Red Star even without Shaq.
eloksjoseph
2
This article is very true... he contributes a lot to the team but he won't get the chance to play in Serbia because of his allegiance to his country why can't people just be tolerant they have decided to turn football into politics it's really bad
Lilbaby✈️
2
It’s always good to consider the interest of others when taking a decision..klopp made the best decision not to play him in order to avoid Liverpool being distracted by what the fans might do..