Joshua Zirkzee has emerged as a serious transfer target for Manchester United, with the club reportedly set to trigger the £33.8million release clause in the striker's contract.

The Red Devils are hoping for incomings and outgoings in the summer transfer window, which is set to be the first one overseen by part-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Ineos. And transfer activity is already starting to ramp up after the club's top brass finally gave Erik ten Hag clarity over his future last week.
It's understood that the club are keen to bring in attacking reinforcements to support Rasmus Hojlund, who endured a challenging start to his maiden season in the Premier League. And while United have other targets, a deal for Zirkzee appeals.
As revealed by The Telegraph, United have 'serious interest' in bringing the Bologna striker to Old Trafford, with the report going on to claim that the club are 'preparing' to trigger the release clause in the 23-year-old's contract after entering into talks with the player's camp.
Zirkzee has been linked with several top European clubs in recent weeks, including AC Milan and Arsenal. He scored 11 goals and laid on five assists in 35 Serie A matches last term.
As well as targeting a new forward, United are also prioritising the signing of a central defender and a holding midfielder. It's outlined, though, that the club's net transfer budget is just £50m, meaning additional funds will need to be raised through player trading.
The Red Devils have already bid for Everton defender Jarrad Branthwaite since the transfer window opened last week, however, it was swiftly rejected by their Premier League rivals, who value the 21-year-old at £70m.
Jean-Clair Todibo of OGC Nice is another player who has been identified as a Manchester United transfer target. However, it has now emerged that UEFA have informed the club they will not be able to sign any players from Nice, who are also owned by Ratcliffe.
Although the British billionaire didn't name any specific players, he hit out at the stance in a wide-ranging interview with Bloomberg, branding it unfair on the player, who is free to be sold to another Premier League club.
"We've got a player in Nice who was interested in Manchester United and he probably has the capability," Ratcliffe said. "They’ve said [UEFA] we can sell him to another Premiership club, but we can't sell to Manchester United. But that's not fair on the player and I don’t see what that achieves."
Betapidkin
1
If truthfully we are going to sign Joshua Zirkzee, then, Greenwood must stay. else, spending heavily on players like osimhen, Lautaro martinez or Alvarez will help solve our attacking woe instead of signing Joshua Zirkzee.
Bozikopstu
0
I also don’t get the noise around Garnnacho…, cmon we’ve seen players far more better at 19 .. Ronaldo, CR7, Messi, Eto, Ronaldinho, Kaka, Robinho and the list goes on. Am just worried that we pay too much attention to hype rather than the input/output of the player.
True that
Daphoenix23
0
Garnacho scored just about the same but gets hype too. I think he will slot into Man U’s system and he can score goals too… under Eth, he can develop to be very deadly
I also don’t get the noise around Garnnacho…, cmon we’ve seen players far more better at 19 .. Ronaldo, CR7, Messi, Eto, Ronaldinho, Kaka, Robinho and the list goes on. Am just worried that we pay too much attention to hype rather than the input/output of the player.
radceintu
0
I don't think you understand anything
MR IGNORANCE. ANYONE ASK FOR YOUR IDIOTIC COMMENT???
Luhadeiknz
0
Zirkzee is a very good player at that price
Luhadeiknz
0
loan Todibo or release him..
It won't work as per law
JoAmon
0
THATS THE PROBLEM WHEN SIR JIM RATCLIFFE IS NOT RICH ENOUGH TO BE A REAL MAN UNITED OWNER FOR GOOD! BUT HE FORCED HIMSELF TO BECAME PART OWNER OF MAN UNITED. PATHETIC TO LOOK AT THE PRICE TAG WHEN PURCHASING FOR NEW PLAYERS OR DECIDUNG TO REBUILD OLD TRAFFORD OR A MAJOR UPGRADING OF OLD TRAFFORD. THE SHEIKH IS DEFINITELY BEEN MISSED! NOW MAN UNITED CANNOT EVEN COMPETE WITH ASTON VILLA! [ko]
I don't think you understand anything
radceintu
0
THATS THE PROBLEM WHEN SIR JIM RATCLIFFE IS NOT RICH ENOUGH TO BE A REAL MAN UNITED OWNER FOR GOOD! BUT HE FORCED HIMSELF TO BECAME PART OWNER OF MAN UNITED. PATHETIC TO LOOK AT THE PRICE TAG WHEN PURCHASING FOR NEW PLAYERS OR DECIDUNG TO REBUILD OLD TRAFFORD OR A MAJOR UPGRADING OF OLD TRAFFORD. THE SHEIKH IS DEFINITELY BEEN MISSED! NOW MAN UNITED CANNOT EVEN COMPETE WITH ASTON VILLA! [ko]
Bozikopstu
0
I don’t get what all the noise is about this zirkzee guy, I mean he scored just 11 goals and got 5 assists so why all the noise of clubs are coming after him.
Garnacho scored just about the same but gets hype too. I think he will slot into Man U’s system and he can score goals too… under Eth, he can develop to be very deadly
liabiklrsy
5
Just let mason Greenwood stay please
Labadkotyz
3
so just let Greenwood stay
JijangaUtdfan
0
another 115 case for another MANCHESTER
We’re not like you guys
bacablmn
4
we want greenwood
boweklosuy
6
Utd is run by dithering idiots. No balls, would have integrated Mason and reinvested that money elsewhere. But like with everything this club has gone to the dogs. ETH will be fired by December at this rate.
Daphoenix23
7
I don’t get what all the noise is about this zirkzee guy, I mean he scored just 11 goals and got 5 assists so why all the noise of clubs are coming after him.
wimlmpru
5
loan Todibo or release him..
ciupruyz
1
better let mason greenwood back to the club than whom won't bring any changes to the club greenwood is a special player even england is missing a player like greenwood
For Greenwood is case is beyond this United board how they wish that guy can play for the team but the team called Manchester United is more than a political party, assuring you that guy won’t play for United again not because he is not good but the manner in which he conducted himself behind the scenes and the kind of affiliations United has got will not allow him to come.
Webanopr
0
another 115 case for another MANCHESTER
ducaeopstz
5
better let mason greenwood back to the club than whom won't bring any changes to the club greenwood is a special player even england is missing a player like greenwood
buwbcdeimr
1
because they wants him to be in Manchester city not in man united
ducaeopstz
4
better let mason greenwood back to the club than whom won't bring any changes greenwood is a special player even england is a player like greenwood