Chelsea defender Marc Cucurella says Cristian Romero's hair pull on him was "clear" as day - and branded the decision not to punish the Tottenham defender as a "referee and VAR error".
Last weekend's Super Sunday clash between Chelsea and Tottenham descended into drama as Romero was not penalised for tugging on Cucurella's hair as Spurs attacked a corner. From the resulting phase of play, Harry Kane headed home a late corner to equalise for 2-2, with managers Antonio Conte and Thomas Tuchel clashing at full-time.
Chelsea boss Tuchel says both of Tottenham's goals last weekend should not have stood and Cucurella believes referee Anthony Taylor and VAR Mike Dean made a mistake in not punishing the Tottenham defender.
"For me it is too clear in the game, on the pitch," Cucurella told a press conference when asked about the incident. "I didn't see it on the TV, the video. I think it's very clear, but this is one error of the referee or VAR.
"Sometimes the referees have good decisions, sometimes not. This is not my problem. Maybe we need to work harder to not concede this goal in the last minute.
"I saw [VAR] checking for a red card in the stadium. For me it is clear. In this moment, I don't know what happened."
Cucurella also joked that his hair is fine and he will never consider changing his style - and added there were no hard feelings towards Tottenham defender Romero.
"I have no problem with him," the Spaniard added. "It's just one action of the game but maybe it was important because it changed the final result.
"For me it's no problem. Before the game I spoke with him [Romero]. I have no problem. It's only one action in the game. Maybe an important action because it changes the final result. We have another opportunity [to beat Spurs]."
Romero to avoid retrospective action for hair pull
Romero will not face retrospective action for the incident late in the game on Sunday - as pulling a player's hair is not considered an offence in football's laws.
Retrospective action can only be given when both the match and video officials fail to spot an incident on the pitch in real time and do not mention it in their post-match report.
Had referee Taylor spotted the incident in real time, then the correct course of action would have been a free-kick to Chelsea, leaving Spurs unable to score from that specific attack.
Unlike rugby, football laws do not specifically mention hair-pulling. The officials must decide whether the extent of the hair pulling is forceful enough to be considered violent conduct.
If it is not, then it would probably be considered unsporting behaviour and result in a yellow card.
Tuchel: Taylor shouldn't referee Chelsea games | 'Where was VAR?'
In his post-match press conference, Tuchel felt referee Taylor should not be allowed to referee Chelsea games anymore after Sunday's performance.
In relation to the first Tottenham goal, Chelsea felt there was a foul on Kai Havertz in the build-up. Taylor disagreed.
Referees have been told there is a higher threshold for fouls this season to help with the flow of games. However, VAR did not look closely at the foul because it wasn't deemed to be in the same attacking phase of play as Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg's goal.
A potential interference by Richarlison, who was standing in an offside position when Hojbjerg struck the ball, was looked at. It was decided his position had no negative impact on goalkeeper Edouard Mendy's position.
Asked whether Taylor should never referee Chelsea again, the German replied: "Maybe it would be better.
"But honestly, we also have VAR to help make the right decisions. Since when can players be pulled at their hair? Since when is that? If he does not see it, I don't blame him.
"I didn't see it, but we have people at VAR who check this. How can this not be a free-kick and how can it not be a red card? How?
"This has nothing to do with the referee in this case. If he does not see something, that's why we have people to check if there's a decisive error going on."
Since the match, Tuchel and Conte have both been charged with a breach of FA Rule E3. It is alleged that the behaviour of both managers was improper following the end of the fixture, with the pair having until Thursday to provide their respective responses.
Meanwhile, VAR official Dean has not been selected for a Premier League fixture this weekend after last Sunday's controversial ending. Referee Taylor, meanwhile, will take charge of West Ham vs Brighton on Sunday.
Chrismaris1
0
You are not a football fan no wonder you have a zero like for your nonsense comment ( rule maker๐)๐
U crave for likes...we just say our mind n leave it n that's it... my comparison is facts. if Suarez pulls someone hair...am telling u...he will see red . same with Diego Costa
Easytemple-CR7-CP10
0
Tailor didn't blow for foul, because he's jealous of cucu's hair ๐
[image]
๐๐๐
Atsad
6
I feel for Chelsea supporters! The referee hates Chelsea so bad that he does whatever he want against them and don't even give a fvck!
andrepoon
0
Gaston Edul also took to social media to suggest Romero sustained an impact injury as a result of Cucurellaโs studs and he will be back in action sooner than expected.
andrepoon
0
There are hardly any player with hair like his, a huge MOP. U can't have laws just to protect one or two players.
lahacknpr
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
do you know the rules of football at all, why do referee stop the play if a team is going to take corner
donnbond
0
you also stomped on him
Gunners4everโค
0
When will this case be resolved,
What's with the Man City badge?
RasheedTemitope12
1
Tailor didn't blow for foul, because he's jealous of cucu's hair ๐
[image]
๐๐
fukcdikstz
0
my advice for cucu and those players with overgrown hairstyle is have it shaved since there's no law to protect you on the pitch.
dunaceklpt
2
When will this case be resolved,
woman always keep mataine their hair so keep your Hari well if not the day of man United matches maguari we do something special with this Hari besides I can't wait dearest maguari
Tipckmouyz
1
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
dumb ass
mukumaphilip
1
a jersey pull is considered a foul but hair pull isn't? wow real smooth Antony Tylor ๐๐พ
Mokbilmsuy
0
Talk is going around that referee Anthony Taylor is a descendant of Judas Iscariot ?
sihclmpst
1
Cut ur hair or hold them together
Johnmechediez2018
1
you pull someone Jersey or arm its a foul, and in the rule book but when u pull someone hair , No foul , its not in rule book...who are the fools making these rules ? even if am not involved in play and am Luiz Suarez or Diego Costa walking pass a play and decided to pull his hair to the extent he gets hurt by it and fall down... We all know whats coming out of the ref pocket...if care is not taken...it would be the ref back short pocket he would reach for...and am out of the game... Am a Liverpool fan...if that happens to us...I won't feel happy
You are not a football fan no wonder you have a zero like for your nonsense comment ( rule maker๐)๐
Tekacdkuz
0
some people argue clear issues just to favour their selfish interest. When defenders give an attacker a knock is it not consider a foul? Wont a finger push on a player be considered a foul given the intent of the push? When a player with a short hair is distracted in the cause of play or action, will it not be considered a foul? Wont it be a foul if,Maguire's hair is pulled when he's on a goal bound move or goal man scramble? on and on...
KayPhik
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
Another amateur
KayPhik
0
If you're a man. Just cut your curly hair. Am just kidding.
Such a stupid fool
rocadmpuy
0
Life is not fair on the less privilege people.
fekdelnory
1
Nonsense referee!! he was look like lost his eyes.
Poealnotz
7
Tailor didn't blow for foul, because he's jealous of cucu's hair ๐
Seziloprst
0
If you're a man. Just cut your curly hair. Am just kidding.
so what of Puyor's hair
Cultabz
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
What a myopic comment.. It was a foul, meaning that the second corner kick wc subsequently led to the goal shldnt have stood.. Are u really a football fan or netball fan? Brush up on ur football knowledge and stop embarrassing urself..
kowagol
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
foolish comment
Putcdemrt
3
English referee is a pity
Taoadnrt
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
you don't know what you're saying and you don't understand football
Chrismaris1
4
you pull someone Jersey or arm its a foul, and in the rule book but when u pull someone hair , No foul , its not in rule book...who are the fools making these rules ? even if am not involved in play and am Luiz Suarez or Diego Costa walking pass a play and decided to pull his hair to the extent he gets hurt by it and fall down... We all know whats coming out of the ref pocket...if care is not taken...it would be the ref back short pocket he would reach for...and am out of the game... Am a Liverpool fan...if that happens to us...I won't feel happy
Loneprsyz
2
If you're a man. Just cut your curly hair. Am just kidding.
Chrismaris1
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
very stupid comment
Canacuy
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
that means u didnt watch the ball
Faoson30
1
So the Var allow him to pull so that there is no foul๐ค๐
thywillsponza
0
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
you're very stupid for saying that
heebekmpr
0
Players should just start pulling hair since it's not in the rule books. I'm sure they would address it then. Ridiculous!
it's a foul anyday. the fact that referee misses one foul on a game doesn't mean you can do it, even if it's not a straight red card
heebekmpr
1
how did that hair pulling affect the score exactly? the ball didn't come anywhere near those 2 so even without hair pulling there would have been another corner - which Spurs then scored
Goal12
3
this was when all the drama started... give me back my hair
Oiram1979
5
Players should just start pulling hair since it's not in the rule books. I'm sure they would address it then. Ridiculous!
NorbuG
3
It's better Cucurella shave his head...for that matter players with shaved head will have advantage as opponents will not be able to pull their hair. What a nonsense interpretation of football law by FA....
SolitarySoul
1
FA sees players as Money ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค money running,money standing, money scoring goals,money taking corner kicks,money fouling money... Corrupted FA
SolitarySoul
1
When will this case be resolved,
will never be resolved FA wants only Money and all they see is money playing on the pitch not players
sukdeikmns
0
it is quite natural bcz he is Argentinian...
Nazdilmpr
0
Remember fellani
sibdkrsz
1
My friend shave if
teeacdlpr
1
When will this case be resolved,
looks like some big issue๐คฃ๐คฃ
ClemJay
3
When will this case be resolved,
nothingspecial
3
hair hair hair everywhere ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ