Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parish left Marc Guehi frustrated on transfer deadline day when he pulled the plug on the club captain's move to Liverpool in the final moments
Crystal Palace chairman Steve Parish had face-to-face talks with Marc Guehi and his family in the aftermath of cancelling the defender's deadline day transfer to Liverpool. Parish pulled the plug on a £35million deal in the final moments of the window with Guehi having already completed part of his medical.
The Eagles star was left furious after he saw talks to seal his dream Liverpool transfer delayed while Palace manager Oliver Glasner put his foot down and threatened to walk away should his defender be sold. Selhurst Park chief Parish chose to stop the deal in its tracks at 4pm on Monday, according to Sky Sports.
Liverpool even submitted a deal sheet in an effort to get a deal done in conjunction with the 7pm deadline but Guehi's camp were frustrated as Palace's chairman was left with explaining to do. Guehi was reportedly considering whether to step down as the club's captain following a frustrating end to the window.
Glasner had wanted to see another central defender arrive before permitting Guehi to depart, even with less than a year on his contract. But that had not initially appeared to slow progress on a move on the final day of the window.
The south London side did sign a defender on deadline day as Jaydee Canvot arrived from French side Toulouse. The 19-year-old was not considered a replacement for Palace's captain however.
Speaking last weekend Austrian coach Glasner, who threatened to quit the club should Palace sell Guehi in the closing hours, said: "We need to keep Marc if we want to play a successful season.
“We have an agreement that if we’re selling Marc we have the right replacement in. We wanted to have this replacement at the beginning of the pre-season.
“There’s no replacement in the building, it’s clear one part of the agreement is not fulfilled. That means we can’t sell Marc.
"It’s not a wish or a gift to Oliver Glasner, it’s necessary for playing a successful season. It’s a tempting situation but if we want to progress, we have to keep him. If we sell we accept a step back."
Liverpool are expected to return for Guehi in January or next summer, when he is available for free. A video paying tribute to the defender's time had even been filmed before his move was cancelled.
Guehi is currently with England ahead of World Cup qualifiers against Andorra and Serbia. The 25-year-old will then return to Palace as the Premier League returns for a clash against Sunderland, where he faces his manager and team-mates once again having been expected to leave.
cj1
0
No Liverpool is not to be blamed,the failure of this deal is entirely caused by palace they said they would only do business after they play their last game of play offs which took place on Thursday then Liverpool immediately had their first bid on the table which was turned down saying they needed 40 mill and can only say if a replacement was found
Am not a kid, dont call me that😭
Popskull954
0
You are just a foolish football second place fan😂😂😂😂😂
Some people are so dumb you can know that they didn't learn anything in school...where was liverpool 5 to six years ago? were they always first? right now I shouldn't reply to you because I can see that you are some little kid...Google liverpool league position 4 to 5 season ago
izacksen
0
You are just a foolish football second place fan😂😂😂😂😂
😂
Kudaoruz
1
When clubs mistreat players no one talks about it. What Palace did is unforgivable it’s called betrayal. You can’t allow someone go through the process only for you to behave like that. Who does that anyway? Players are human beings with emotions and the guy had already envisioned himself along side Virgil. If player refuses to live after the club has signed all documents, such a player will be painted all colours everyone has
cj1
0
Liverpool is to be blamed why didn't they go for him earlier in the transfer window..so Crystal Palace has time to replace him
You are just a foolish football second place fan😂😂😂😂😂
vaybdmosyz
0
AF where is the details?
menaceortu
0
Liverpool is to be blamed why didn't they go for him earlier in the transfer window..so Crystal Palace has time to replace him
No Liverpool is not to be blamed,the failure of this deal is entirely caused by palace they said they would only do business after they play their last game of play offs which took place on Thursday then Liverpool immediately had their first bid on the table which was turned down saying they needed 40 mill and can only say if a replacement was found
dicdlmno
0
hope mark doing strike like isak
kolonegooner
0
Sloppy piece of bizness
Popskull954
1
Liverpool is to be blamed why didn't they go for him earlier in the transfer window..so Crystal Palace has time to replace him
Vetabciktu
2
35mill down the drain how stupid
toodilnpsz
4
You loose the player for free than.
toodilnpsz
3
You loose the player than.