Alexander Isak’s escape from Newcastle United was conducted with the determination of a desperate man.
It brought an end to a summer in the north-east when the club was rejected by one elite player after another and St James’ Park became a no-go zone for the superstars of the game who many fans had expected to flock there when Saudi Arabia bought the club.
Maybe it’s a bone-saw thing. It is natural to speculate whether, at some level, the greatest players might wonder if it is good for their image to play for a nation state that chops political opponents into pieces and puts them in bin-liners and which, only two weeks ago, executed a man for taking part in Arab Spring protests when he was 16 years old.
Humanitarian concerns have not stopped Lionel Messi becoming an ambassador for Saudi tourism and nor have they prevented Cristiano Ronaldo from becoming the face of the Saudi Pro League as the star of Al-Nassr. Maybe most players – like most people outside the game - do not give too much thought about where the money is coming from.
On one level, the spate of rejections is mystifying. Newcastle have a fine manager in Eddie Howe and they have one of the most committed and fanatical armies of supporters in the country and one of the best stadiums. I was at the game against Liverpool at St James’ Park last month and it was the best atmosphere I’ve heard at an English ground for a long time.
But what is impossible to deny is that a procession of the most highly-rated footballers of the summer including Joao Pedro, Benjamin Sesko and Hugo Ekitike turned their backs on a move to the north-east amid questions about quite what has happened to Saudi ambitions for Howe’s team.
By now, many of those who once boasted that Newcastle were the richest club in the world and foresaw a line-up featuring Kylian Mbappe, Robert Lewandowski and Neymar Jr, expected them to be title challengers and contenders for the Champions League trophy.
Instead, the way that the Saudis surrendered to Isak and caved in to Liverpool’s financial offer for their best player has redrawn the view of Newcastle: they might have the richest owners in world football but they are still a selling club.
For all their aspirations of becoming a part of the elite, the sale of Isak shows that they are still very much a second-tier team. The departure of the Swede, in fact, asks far wider questions about the Saudis’ commitment to Newcastle.
Their arrival was supposed to mark the end of them playing second fiddle to Liverpool, Manchester City and Manchester United but even though there has been considerable progress, that progress appears to have stalled well short of the summit.
There has been precious little investment in the training ground. It is the same story with St James’ Park, which is a magnificent arena but an arena in need of modernisation. There has been talk of building a new ground but nothing more.
Good players have arrived this summer. Anthony Elanga and Jacob Ramsey are both fine recruits who will improve the team but paying £55m for 29-year-old Yoane Wissa from Brentford smacks of desperation and paying £65m for the unproven Nick Woltemade from Stuttgart is a big gamble.
The revisionism that insists that, actually, Newcastle have had a good transfer window is delusional. They have lost their best player and their status as one of the up-and-coming teams in the league has taken a huge hit.
Isak’s emergence as the most feared striker in the Premier League was supposed to be the start of something but instead his exit, which was conducted with an utter absence of class and respect for fans who adored him, is a significant blow to Newcastle’s ambitions.
It is partly the example it sets. Why would another elite player want to go to the club when he sees that the hierarchy of the English game still places Newcastle outside the top echelon? Why would another elite player want to go to the north-east when he sees Isak so keen to force his way out that he trashes his reputation in the process?
Many believed that, if nothing else, the Saudis would at least have the strength, the resolve and the wealth to hold Isak to his contract and make a statement that Newcastle were no longer a team that was a feeder club for the elite. That did not happen.
Some Newcastle fans must be wondering whether it was all worth it. Lionising the Saudi owners has come at a heavy cost to the wider reputation of the club and even if they won the Carabao Cup last season, the pursuit of the biggest trophies has been thrown into doubt by the events of this summer.
The supporters disliked former owner Mike Ashley so much because they felt he had settled for mediocrity. The sale of Isak, and the refusal of so many elite players to countenance joining them, means they are entitled to harbour the same fears about the Saudis.
Williamslad
0
he knows city more than liverpool...
Our history is in my book too
Williamslad
0
This is a diehard fan of City of Manchester, I'm telling you, no lies...
Just have a vast knowledge of other clubs
AFersoKI1753
0
Calling a human being like you trash isn't good, we are all here for the beauty of the game, if you don't like someone keep it to your self don't badmouth them.
His manager career at the moment is trash. Not him himself. I don’t know the guy personally no one here does.
zaheinstu
0
Newcastle should be renamed as Sandcastle under the Arabs
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
TalataSheriff
1
but you see one thing you people forgetting to know is that when the players reach to setting level of their career they can hunger for a big trophy like champions league, premier league and others so when Isak looks at Newcastle team he don't see any possibility of winning these trophies the next thing he did is to take the next steps look for team that can challenge those trophies and gain it and that's what he is trying to do and every players will do the same thing because everybody needs big trophy when they reach to setting level in your career.
yambcklrsu
0
you're a great football historian
he knows city more than liverpool...
yambcklrsu
0
If Newcastle spending wise, they would've attract top players when city started it big spending Mark Hughes signings 1st season: Given, Robinho, Wayne Bridge, Zabaleta, Nigel De Jong, Bellamy, Kompany, Wright Phillips 2nd season: Tevez, Barry, Lescott, Vieira, Kolo Toure, Adebayor, Adam Johnson, Santa Cruz Roberto Mancini signings 1st: Jerome Boateng, Yaya Toure, David Silva, Kolarov, Balotelli, Milner, Dzeko 2nd: Aguero, Nasri, Hargreaves, Clichy Manuel Pellegrini Era Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo Jovetic, Demichelis
This is a diehard fan of City of Manchester, I'm telling you, no lies...
The_Phoenix
0
Agree with you bro
Thanks bro
Widbiltz
0
why will you say that the manager is not good , the manager is good , it just a matter of time , if you let that manager to go , it will take more time to get a good manager , this same thing happened to so many club I don't want to name when you build a team lowly you don't rush them , be patient, after some time you try to look at other managers who are more better than them , if new manager even come to team , it will take sometime to build a standard team . I can't even say Liverpool is perfect team now , if Liverpool want to keep more goals , they should have not allow Luis leave ,
Have good understanding of what you read,he never said Howe isn't good.
Widbiltz
1
If Newcastle spending wise, they would've attract top players when city started it big spending Mark Hughes signings 1st season: Given, Robinho, Wayne Bridge, Zabaleta, Nigel De Jong, Bellamy, Kompany, Wright Phillips 2nd season: Tevez, Barry, Lescott, Vieira, Kolo Toure, Adebayor, Adam Johnson, Santa Cruz Roberto Mancini signings 1st: Jerome Boateng, Yaya Toure, David Silva, Kolarov, Balotelli, Milner, Dzeko 2nd: Aguero, Nasri, Hargreaves, Clichy Manuel Pellegrini Era Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo Jovetic, Demichelis
you're a great football historian
Richard0010
0
Let’s take a second here fellas, when Isak arrived from La Liga he wasn’t as big as he is now and Liverpool would not have paid that much to sign him then so his current deal was what was good then. Fast forward 3 years he is now a top player and still has 3 years left on his contract, at Newcastle money wasn’t the issue they were willing to give him fresh terms but with fresh term the contract length increases and he is 25, let’s face it currently Liverpool are a bigger club and that opportunity would have been hard to come by again had he passed on it. Just look at the Trent situation, when a bigger club comes calling, you may even offer your player better salary but chances of them staying are very slim.
Totally agree with you for this analysis. Bravo 👏🏻
Williamslad
2
If Newcastle spending wise, they would've attract top players when city started it big spending Mark Hughes signings 1st season: Given, Robinho, Wayne Bridge, Zabaleta, Nigel De Jong, Bellamy, Kompany, Wright Phillips 2nd season: Tevez, Barry, Lescott, Vieira, Kolo Toure, Adebayor, Adam Johnson, Santa Cruz Roberto Mancini signings 1st: Jerome Boateng, Yaya Toure, David Silva, Kolarov, Balotelli, Milner, Dzeko 2nd: Aguero, Nasri, Hargreaves, Clichy Manuel Pellegrini Era Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo Jovetic, Demichelis
Every football fan knows the rest
Williamslad
4
If Newcastle spending wise, they would've attract top players when city started it big spending Mark Hughes signings 1st season: Given, Robinho, Wayne Bridge, Zabaleta, Nigel De Jong, Bellamy, Kompany, Wright Phillips 2nd season: Tevez, Barry, Lescott, Vieira, Kolo Toure, Adebayor, Adam Johnson, Santa Cruz Roberto Mancini signings 1st: Jerome Boateng, Yaya Toure, David Silva, Kolarov, Balotelli, Milner, Dzeko 2nd: Aguero, Nasri, Hargreaves, Clichy Manuel Pellegrini Era Fernandinho, Navas, Negredo Jovetic, Demichelis
kosaclmru
1
yupe, correct 😄😄
KingCarrot
2
Newcastle should be renamed as Sandcastle under the Arabs
fayabclmrt
6
Newcastle is still a top club. they will contest for top four. losing Isak isn't a big issue. There were many times they played without him and won games
Richard0010
1
When a bigger club comes calling even if you offer more money a player will still leave and currently Liverpool is bigger than Newcastle. When Madrid came for Trent what happened? Barca had it not been for the salary cap and registration issues they would have taken Nico even though Bilbao didn’t want to sell that’s just the law of nature
Agree with you bro
Hatersmyass
0
Mourinho is trash now that’s the issue there. Couldn’t win an easy league with Fenerbace. Plus got smacked out of the UCL. Why do you think they sacked him. He isn’t good anymore.
Calling a human being like you trash isn't good, we are all here for the beauty of the game, if you don't like someone keep it to your self don't badmouth them.
Mrbank
3
why will you say that the manager is not good , the manager is good , it just a matter of time , if you let that manager to go , it will take more time to get a good manager , this same thing happened to so many club I don't want to name when you build a team lowly you don't rush them , be patient, after some time you try to look at other managers who are more better than them , if new manager even come to team , it will take sometime to build a standard team . I can't even say Liverpool is perfect team now , if Liverpool want to keep more goals , they should have not allow Luis leave ,
ticabdinsu
0
The problem of Newcastle is that they don’t have an elitist coach like Jose Mourinho. No player will ever refuse to play under Mourinho. Think about it and do the needful
shut up your toilet. you horse manure. you can't even wear mourinho shoes.
Mrbank
3
let us stop this hate , this is football, no club have the right to stop players not to leave , it all depends on what you bargain with the players that will keep them ,if you watch Liverpool from the season of 2000 until this days , Liverpool has face this before in business between players and club on what they desire to do and where to go . if a players want to leave allow him to go , it is painful to see your best players leave , it is paint for you to go for players and they turn down your request, but you don't need to look into that , there are also players who want to come and stay , all they need to do is to build their team with what they have for now , Liverpool has allow so many great players leave to another club , Liverpool didn't stop them , Suarez leave , Alonso leave , so many of them.Owen , Torres ,I can't name them , 2 season ago , Liverpool lost most of their players to Saudi pro league,and they go into the market , and players turn them down. even when they want to pay the money, and they leave to another club , even Salah should have been Liverpool player long ago , but he left for Chelsea, before he become Liverpool player, so many go so many come , when Luis deiz ,leave , they allow him to go , and again Alexander,leave , now Konate want to go , so Liverpool already know that he didn't want to stay , the more you keep who doesn't want to stay , the more it broke the heart of others , the fans and everyone , let us just take the pains for once and support the one we have , and give the same energy to the one we have instead of hate And talking down the club , this can happen at anytime to any club. there are so many players Liverpool call for they didn't come , they have love for another team.
The_Phoenix
1
They didn’t, they should have offer him the money he requested for, 300k pounds per week is not much concern how much the rest players that’s not near him is collecting weekly. If they offer him money he would have wait from the beginning and once he announced his move and Liverpool step in so you think he will rethink again. No no no
When a bigger club comes calling even if you offer more money a player will still leave and currently Liverpool is bigger than Newcastle. When Madrid came for Trent what happened? Barca had it not been for the salary cap and registration issues they would have taken Nico even though Bilbao didn’t want to sell that’s just the law of nature
The_Phoenix
1
Bro correct yourself first.. If club wants to keep the best player of their own club.. they must offer them better salaries.. everybody wants s a luxury life.. if the player is one of the best in the league.. 👍🏿
Let’s take a second here fellas, when Isak arrived from La Liga he wasn’t as big as he is now and Liverpool would not have paid that much to sign him then so his current deal was what was good then. Fast forward 3 years he is now a top player and still has 3 years left on his contract, at Newcastle money wasn’t the issue they were willing to give him fresh terms but with fresh term the contract length increases and he is 25, let’s face it currently Liverpool are a bigger club and that opportunity would have been hard to come by again had he passed on it. Just look at the Trent situation, when a bigger club comes calling, you may even offer your player better salary but chances of them staying are very slim.
NampoPooh
0
This analysis is dead wrong, Newcastle is not a selling club they did their best to keep Isak but his heart was set on a move to Liverpool keeping him hostage would have worsened the image for the club because if players think a club will keep them against their will top players won’t come. But in the end if they have to be forced to sell they need a good some for the top prized asset. Because of Financial Fair play rules they need to balance their books too the can’t just pump money into the club.
Bro correct yourself first.. If club wants to keep the best player of their own club.. they must offer them better salaries.. everybody wants s a luxury life.. if the player is one of the best in the league.. 👍🏿
Citizens721
1
Football world may agree with this though, "Newcastle will never be a top tier club" 😝
out of hatred clown is speaking out.
Mrbank
0
wrong my dear , this is football , let them stop thinking this way , Chelsea start to rise only one day , they can still go down if they didn't keep it up , Man U is up because of their old name ,but is they didn't keep it up , they will lose value with time , Newcastle can still be on top , just a matter of time , one thing I understand in football , no need to hate or blame any one for leaving, don't feel inferior when players turn you down . this as happen to Liverpool long ago , players don't even want to come to Liverpool then , Liverpool can't go to the market with Chelsea or Man U or Man City , or Real Madrid, or Baca , and win that players then , because why the players want to go there . is their choice , the reason I always appreciate Kloop is because he is the one that bring back Liverpool to this standard again , he use finish players or players who are not valued ,and transform them to a value players , and again in that period of time , Liverpool because team that go in to a season and achieve something by the end of the Season .
tayabiluyz
1
very soon they will, the elite was once a minor club till they reached were they are, if Newcastle invested wisely they will
weee
Richard0010
0
This analysis is dead wrong, Newcastle is not a selling club they did their best to keep Isak but his heart was set on a move to Liverpool keeping him hostage would have worsened the image for the club because if players think a club will keep them against their will top players won’t come. But in the end if they have to be forced to sell they need a good some for the top prized asset. Because of Financial Fair play rules they need to balance their books too the can’t just pump money into the club.
They didn’t, they should have offer him the money he requested for, 300k pounds per week is not much concern how much the rest players that’s not near him is collecting weekly. If they offer him money he would have wait from the beginning and once he announced his move and Liverpool step in so you think he will rethink again. No no no
SGTSingam
1
Football world may agree with this though, "Newcastle will never be a top tier club" 😝
AFersoKI1753
0
The problem of Newcastle is that they don’t have an elitist coach like Jose Mourinho. No player will ever refuse to play under Mourinho. Think about it and do the needful
Mourinho is trash now that’s the issue there. Couldn’t win an easy league with Fenerbace. Plus got smacked out of the UCL. Why do you think they sacked him. He isn’t good anymore.
DenverScot
0
The problem of Newcastle is that they don’t have an elitist coach like Jose Mourinho. No player will ever refuse to play under Mourinho. Think about it and do the needful
The_Phoenix
6
This analysis is dead wrong, Newcastle is not a selling club they did their best to keep Isak but his heart was set on a move to Liverpool keeping him hostage would have worsened the image for the club because if players think a club will keep them against their will top players won’t come. But in the end if they have to be forced to sell they need a good some for the top prized asset. Because of Financial Fair play rules they need to balance their books too the can’t just pump money into the club.
donreal1990
2
very soon they will, the elite was once a minor club till they reached were they are, if Newcastle invested wisely they will