Cole Palmer is once again proving why he is one of the Premier League's best young stars, with the Chelsea forward playing a crucial role in his side's 6-2 victory over Wolves on Sunday afternoon.
Enzo Maresca's side got their first win of the 2024-25 campaign, with Palmer setting up Noni Madueke for all three of his goals, while the former Man City star also found the back of the net himself.
Nicolas Jackson opened the scoring for the Blues after two minutes with Matheus Cunha levelling after 27 minutes. Palmer subsequently hit back with a second goal in the 45th minute, before Jorgen Strand Larsen tapped in another equaliser, to make it 2-2.
Madueke would go on a scoring spree after half-time, netting a hat-trick of goals, before Joao Felix wrapped up the game with a strike of his own on his return to the Premier League.
Some, though, have claimed that Palmer's strike should not have stood.
With Robert Sanchez spraying a long ball up field to Nicolas Jackson Chelsea crashed forwards towards Wolves' penalty area.
The Senegalese striker held up play well, before flicking the ball on to Palmer.
The England star, who picked up the PFA Young Player of the Year Award last week, noticed that Wolves goalkeeper Jose Sa had advanced off his goalline in an attempt to shut down the oncoming attack and sensed his chance to put the Blues ahead.
With Sa caught out of position, Palmer cleverly dinked the ball over the goalkeeper, who was left floundering on the floor as he attempted to stop the ball from hitting the back of the net.
It was perhaps the goal of the match, but some believe it should not have stood, with fans noticing that Sanchez had not let the ball come to rest before he delivered the long pass to initiate the move.
Replays showed that the ball was still rolling when the Spain international had played his goal kick up to Jackson.
Under the FA's Rules of the Game, Law 16 states 'the ball must be stationary' before it is kicked.
BeIN Sports broadcaster, Richard Keys, had noticed the infraction and subsequently argued that Palmer's goal should have been chalked.
'It's rolling,' the former Sky Sports television host said.
'Strictly speaking, it should be disallowed.'
Questions had been raised over why VAR did not intervene to disallow the strike.
But the goal would ultimately stand due to the Premier League's rules on how VAR can be used, with the video assistant referee's protocols preventing them from checking restarts.
Palmer, meanwhile, would go on to join an exclusive club of players, which includes the likes of Stan Collymore, Thierry Henry and Harry Kane, to have assisted each goal for a team-mate's hat-trick in the Premier League
rikbdmpsty
0
wow very nice essentially celebrate two guess my players
rikbdmpsty
1
Palma I like playing has will specially and flex can has Winn the mach day Chelsea team me never stop I not spot Chelsea players there's performance game Mach fans Chelsea up to up tables points
Tehbceimrt
0
nonsense
akpchoichinho001
0
i can't remember Palmer much or doing anything special against city last week
he was played out of position
fepadeorst
2
you are always saying rubbish
viydeinpst
1
even if penalty against city was given kovacic still punish them with that thunder bolt goal
viydeinpst
1
i can't remember Palmer much or doing anything special against city last week
jeaakprtyz
2
go and sleep, you only select things you wish to post.
Emmanueldahn520Dahn
0
who you telling your bush****k to. Nonsense π€£ππ
Zokabekmn
0
already game down nd re u forgetting the games we lost with city last week
mistamaveth
5
Some goals are too beautiful to be ruled out even if found faulty.... Enjoy it man cos more are still to come.
Ogbajiemmanuel
0
And who cares
maxcyril
0
this man never talk wetin Chelsea do am
I beg thank you
Kadbdnosz
0
bein sports are drunk for such comment
stupid pundits
Kadbdnosz
2
bein sports are drunk for such comment
KenSaroWiwa77
0
Stupid haters everywhere........none of you notice Arsenal dirty antics of obstructing goalkeepers during corner kicks or free kicks!! Y'all are madπ‘
bazbdimpu
3
You wish you could find faults with all of Chelsea's goals. Chalk off that one and see if Chelsea cares. We still pocket the three points. We still have a positive goal difference, and Lol, Man-U still remains beaten by Brighton.ππ
Kelvin_Iyke_Blues
0
IT DID. CASE CLOSED AF. THE FOCUS NOW IS SERVIETTE
midestivah
0
all of una be weyrey
Rizcdinpu
2
this man never talk wetin Chelsea do am
Boickie
2
you guys should not forget what Anthony Tylar did to Chelsea in their first game
Loobcdklnu
2
We dont care π Its in
akiamo
0
ref has final say π
Rasckloy
6
Hypocrite, when Chelsea vs Man City Kovacic had foul with his hand did you say about that? Hypocrite.
joebell
2
if it is against Chelsea it will still stand but is in favour of Chelsea it should be disallowed what have Chelsea done to all of U
sangaytsheri
1
haha it's still 5 2 don't shout too much .. he had still assisted three .. that's enough you haters
nebeikrsy
3
Richard is foolish what about the handball Chelsea vs Man city
Yascilotuz
1
just look at you, go and ask VAR the reason why they don't give Chelsea penalty against man city for handball last week.
God bless you o
juuadnouz
2
ok 2:5 it's still a win, why the hate
jhkr
3
now days VAR is useless its just brought in wen they wish nor were necessary
bowacdin
5
just look at you, go and ask VAR the reason why they don't give Chelsea penalty against man city for handball last week.