Football lawmakers insist instant replays from video assistant referees (VARs) must not be shown inside stadiums until a decision has been made by match officials.
The introduction of VARs in the Premier League has led to criticism from some supporters over a lack of communication.
The Premier League allows footage to be shown at stadiums with big screens if a decision is overturned.
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) has confirmed it will not block any other footage broadcast on big screens, but only after a decision has been made by the referee.
"We have to protect referees," IFAB secretary Lukas Brud told Sky Sports News.
"We want to avoid referees feeling pressured or influenced by players, managers or fans as they are in the process of making a decision.
"We do not allow decision-making footage to be shown while it is under consideration."
It is understood the Premier League has no immediate plans to show more than overturned decisions on big screens at this stage.
The Premier League will continue to hold talks with clubs and fans over the best experience.
There have been more than 130 VAR incidents in the opening 20 games of the Premier League, with five overturned decisions.
"Competitions are allowed to show footage," said Brud. "But they know best what is most appropriate and effective for their local football environment."
Matendeabass
48
I know all these critisms are based on man City goals but the question is does VAR become bad of it's decision is against you. let man City remember the Liverpool goal last season second leg which gave them the trophy because Liverpool was to lead them 10 points clear but VAR disallowed their goal and points were reduced. why didn't man City criticise this? is it because it was in their favour? let us accept the decisions of VAR and it should be given an independent platform form to exercise it's rights. whether your the champion or the weakest team in the league no one is above the rules and decisions of VAR