Related：
Real MadridBarcelonaVillarrealJavier Tebas
Hot comments
happylife
56
2018-09-13 01:30
People haven't got the money for your overpriced tickets , buy the time you have put food and transport into the equation is it any wonder people are staying away , the bottom team in the relegation battle is even given millions , plus sky money , bt , and now Amazon , your basically all robbing the public
Ledontow
50
2018-09-13 01:21
West Ham will not be in that stadium in another decade. Gold, Sullivan and Brady will leave that club high and dry. Arsenal not responding is no surprise at all. They would be far worse than any club. However, ticket prices are a problem and football fans need to stick together and protest as one to get them lowered.
Cristiankish
46
2018-09-13 01:29
They all fiddle the figures. Don't know why DM have picked these particular clubs but would say that the Newham Council stats are almost certainly wrong because whilst there may well be only about 42,000 in the stadium by the end, whenever we watch Match of the Day and West Ham are at home it looks pretty sold out. And if DM want to start calling out clubs then the worst offenders have to be Arsenal. After the Carabao Cup final defeat to Man City the very next game at the Emirates was given an official attendance of over 59,000 when it was blatantly clear that there were barely 35,000 who turned up because they count tickets sold, not people in the ground. Funnily enough, back in the day, it used to be the other way around. Clubs would under estimate the attendance on purpose because it was pay on the gate and the money was taxable income so the fewer official fans in attendance, the less tax to pay!
tallesti
35
2018-09-13 01:29
It's a constant source of embarrassment to City and their fans that despite having the best manager , best players and the Premier League title they cannot fill a moderately sized stadium no matter who they play unless it is of course a game against Manchester United. Forever in our shadow. Oh for the days when Peter Swales used to under state the actual attendances so he could trouser the cash. Look what you have become.
Bromenshenkel
26
2018-09-13 01:38
The thing is with West Ham , they have never really claimed to be a big club and it is understandable that they would struggle to get above 42000 at home. With Tottenham and Man City, they do claim to be big clubs. It is know Man City have never filled the Etihad , but if the Spuds are having to exaggerate then it brings into question the building of the new ground.
happylife
56
People haven't got the money for your overpriced tickets , buy the time you have put food and transport into the equation is it any wonder people are staying away , the bottom team in the relegation battle is even given millions , plus sky money , bt , and now Amazon , your basically all robbing the public
Ledontow
50
West Ham will not be in that stadium in another decade. Gold, Sullivan and Brady will leave that club high and dry. Arsenal not responding is no surprise at all. They would be far worse than any club. However, ticket prices are a problem and football fans need to stick together and protest as one to get them lowered.
Cristiankish
46
They all fiddle the figures. Don't know why DM have picked these particular clubs but would say that the Newham Council stats are almost certainly wrong because whilst there may well be only about 42,000 in the stadium by the end, whenever we watch Match of the Day and West Ham are at home it looks pretty sold out. And if DM want to start calling out clubs then the worst offenders have to be Arsenal. After the Carabao Cup final defeat to Man City the very next game at the Emirates was given an official attendance of over 59,000 when it was blatantly clear that there were barely 35,000 who turned up because they count tickets sold, not people in the ground. Funnily enough, back in the day, it used to be the other way around. Clubs would under estimate the attendance on purpose because it was pay on the gate and the money was taxable income so the fewer official fans in attendance, the less tax to pay!
tallesti
35
It's a constant source of embarrassment to City and their fans that despite having the best manager , best players and the Premier League title they cannot fill a moderately sized stadium no matter who they play unless it is of course a game against Manchester United. Forever in our shadow. Oh for the days when Peter Swales used to under state the actual attendances so he could trouser the cash. Look what you have become.
Bromenshenkel
26
The thing is with West Ham , they have never really claimed to be a big club and it is understandable that they would struggle to get above 42000 at home. With Tottenham and Man City, they do claim to be big clubs. It is know Man City have never filled the Etihad , but if the Spuds are having to exaggerate then it brings into question the building of the new ground.