Manchester United will have to qualify for the Champions League and raise significant money through player sales if Erik ten Hag is to sign the midfielder and striker he wants this summer – even if the Glazers sell the club.
The United manager wants to sign a top striker, with the likes of Harry Kane, Benjamin Sesko and Victor Osimhen on the club's radar, and another leading midfielder, such as Frenkie de Jong or Jude Bellingham.
But Telegraph Sport understands a change of ownership will make little difference to Ten Hag's summer transfer kitty if revenues are not significantly boosted by the return of Champions League football – which looks more important than ever – and player sales. He may have to choose between a pedigree striker or midfielder given the impact of Uefa's new Financial Sustainability rules and the £307 million the club still owe in transfer fee instalments.
United would give their prospects of an unexpected title charge this season a massive boost by beating Manchester City in the derby on Saturday and Premier League leaders Arsenal the following week. But Uefa's new Financial Sustainability rules – coupled with the cash United already owe on transfers – have dramatically increased the pressure on Ten Hag to ensure his side finish in the top four and make decisive moves over the futures of players such as Harry Maguire, Aaron Wan-Bissaka, Fred and Donny van Beek, all of whom could leave to free up cash to spend elsewhere. Ten Hag would also like another right back.
Cristiano Ronaldo's exit in November left Ten Hag desperate to bolster his attack but the manager has been forced to pursue a low cost, no obligation loan for Netherlands striker Wout Weghorst this month, with the pursestrings so tight after the club vastly exceeded their budget last summer with a £200 million-plus splurge on six new signings.
A second successive season outside the Champions League would also lead to a 30 per cent cut – the equivalent of £22.5 million – in their £75million-a-year deal with kit supplier Adidas, although any such hit would be spread over the remaining two years of the deal.
Under the new squad cost controls that were introduced by Uefa last June, clubs will be restricted to spending 70 per cent of their total revenues on transfers, salaries for players and coaches and agents' fees by 2025/26. For this season the figure is 100 per cent to allow a period of adaptation before it drops to 90 per cent next season and 80 per cent in 2024/25, with football's European governing body keen to limit wage and transfer inflation.
As part of the cost measures, revenues class as operating income plus profits on player sales while Uefa use player amortisation – an accounting term which involves spreading transfer fees over the length of a player's contract – to calculate how much a club has spent.
United are forecasting revenues of between £590 million and £610 million for this season, up from £583 million for 2021/22, and that figure would swell considerably next term if they return to the Champions League.
But, without Champions League football, there will be an even greater burden on United to sell well this summer – something they have habitually failed to do during the post Sir Alex Ferguson era – to allow Ten Hag to strengthen his squad given Uefa cost pressures and the strain put on cash flow by the money owed in transfers. According to the latest accounts, that figure stood at £307 million.
Otherwise, Ten Hag will likely have to prioritise a striker over a midfielder such as De Jong, whom he tried and failed to sign from Barcelona last summer and would still like to bring to Old Trafford.
If United sold their captain Maguire for half the £80 million they paid Leicester in 2019, midfielder Fred for about £30 million and right-back Wan-Bissaka for around £20 million, that would equate to around £50 million in profit on player sales when calculated against their existing book value. Maguire, for example, has two years to run on his six-year contract – the equivalent of £26.67 million in remaining book value, so a sale at £40 million would translate as a £13.33 million profit.
As of last season, United's spending on transfers, wages and agents fees are estimated to have stood at more than 80 per cent of turnover plus profit on player sales. Revenues were £583.2 million and the profit on player sales £21.9 million – giving a total of £605.1 million – but player amortisation accounted for £151.5 million and agents' fees £29 million. Player and coaches' salaries are estimated to account for around 80 per cent of a £384.2 million wage bill, which included compensation for Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and Ralf Rangnick's departures.
With revenues forecast to be marginally higher this season – and the wage bill down due to the mid-season departure of Ronaldo and player salaries being lower because of the absence of Champions League football – that ratio is expected to drop.
But another year out of Europe's premier club competition and another poor window of sales could severely impact Ten Hag's plans to greatly strengthen his squad this summer in light of Uefa's tightening ratios from next season. United's revenues have increased by 61 per cent since Ferguson retired in 2013 but this has been dwarfed by a 113 per cent rise in wage costs and transfer fee amortisation of 263 per cent over the same period.
Nonetheless, Premier League rivals such as Arsenal and Chelsea, who have also spent heavily but have smaller revenue streams than United, may find they have even tighter headroom with the new Uefa rules. United have also tended to operate with a healthier wage-to-turnover ratio than most leading domestic and European rivals.
It is thought United – who are supportive of the regulations and recognise the importance of financial fair play, which will have ramifications across Europe – believe the fact the club operates a positive equity on their balance sheet unlike many leading rivals is also an advantage as it will permit the “allowable” loss under the Uefa regulations.
Weghorst is expected to join on loan before United focus their efforts on signing a permanent replacement for Ronaldo in the summer, with the likes of Tottenham's Kane, Osimhen of Napoli and Sesko, who plays for RB Salzburg but is due to join RB Leipzig at the end of the season, among those being watched.
MRV7
0
Maguire, Jones, Tuanzebe, Williams, Telles all need to go!
lemadlnopu
0
this should be the line up against Manchester city
[image]
Maybe for fifa 23
kembeikps
0
this should be the line up against Manchester city
[image]
remove Anthony from dat wing he's not playing well
Th£MilkMan
0
Fred is not for sale
ManUnited-Red
2
We need new owners!
Kohilmorst
0
this should be the line up against Manchester city
Kohilmorst
1
why not selling Jones Maguires and van beck then bring a striker we don't need Middle fid coz we have good quality already.
deddklmn
2
Always try to read and understand an article before criticizing. In summary, there will be a Financial Fair Pay rules that will affect some clubs in the upcoming transfer window. Most especially those that have spent over 70% of their revenues in previous transfer window and team wages (players and coaches). It will restrict clubs in that cycle in buying of players in the next transfer window leaving some clubs with the option of sell to buy I.e sell some players to buy a player or few players. You will see an instance of selling Maguire in this article stating that the amount you sell him is not equivalent to the amount you will have in hand to get another player rather there will be a calculation of the amount the player worth given the number of years he has left on his contract minus the actual amount he was being sold then, the profit is what the club can spend on another player. I hope you understand this briefing
Yuuaclmny
1
The Hag needs great players cause he’s not a really great coach. And his man management skills is intimidation.
You know nothing about football
Mapabeimru
1
The Hag needs great players cause he’s not a really great coach. And his man management skills is intimidation.
Emchi
1
Okay but, because he's not an English that's why all these nonsense of no money is coming out. Rubbish!!!
skilz5
1
where is the article? I can't see anything here
Joudinsuy
0
the only best striker at the moment that fit united ❤️ is victor osimhen
Jolars
0
we don't even want Harry Kane... Not for anything at all
Emmy619
6
Honestly Speaking i didn't have the Patience to Read the Whole Article before Scrolling down to the Comment section.😁
AMRi_ZACK
0
CB: MILAN SKRINIAR. free ST : DUSAN VLAHOVIC. £65 - 80 CM: DE JONG / BELIGHAM £65 - 90 SANCHO returning stonger DEAN HENDERSON. returning SELL MAGUIRE VDB ELANGA AMAD
GGMUSTAR
0
So u that play in ucl did ya ever archive it Bomboclat 😂🫢
Noo Manchester city is UCLess 😂😂😂😂
jezabdnpyz
0
Top Striker Target 🎯 Will Be Victor Osimhen.., Benjamin Sesko Has Already Signed For RB Leipzig And Unless Spurs Themselves Find A Striker Of Their Own.., No Way Levy Is Going To Agree On Selling Kane To Their Direct Rival In The League.
baaiknpsy
1
I wonder why the glazers are behaving like this
sToneyvibezz
1
Okay fine, I read the article. Now tell me, what point are y’all really trying to make huh?!🥺🤷🏾♂️🤔
[image]
the point glazers are shite at business and the incompetency can be found amongst the hierarchy and that that glazers should fuq right off #glazersout
sekilnotu
0
Sorry no Hary Kane
PrinceJnr11
3
Okay fine, I read the article. Now tell me, what point are y’all really trying to make huh?!🥺🤷🏾♂️🤔
mumdemosty
0
But they have bought Antony for 90 million. Casemiro for 60 million and Martinez for 50 million. Without UCL football
So u that play in ucl did ya ever archive it Bomboclat 😂🫢
NFK97
4
With all those rules How's Chelsea doing what they're doing?
soldierzway
3
But they have bought Antony for 90 million. Casemiro for 60 million and Martinez for 50 million. Without UCL football
Yirajang
6
please summarize it for me when you are done reading because I can't read this