Cristiano Ronaldo couldn't hide his devastation after he was sent off on his Champions League debut for Juventus on Wednesday and his detractors have been quick to make the most of his misery.
The 33-year-old was dismissed during the first half of Wednesday night's Group H opener in Valencia following an off-the-ball clash with Jeison Murillo.
Ronaldo now faces a two-match ban for violent conduct, which would see him miss his side's clash at Old Trafford, but that could rise to three after UEFA determine the length of the ban in the coming days.
The Portuguese superstar, who had appeared to grab Murillo's hair, was visibly shocked by referee's decision and was inconsolable as he was led away from the field in tears.
The reaction on social media was typically huge as fans took the chance to mock Ronaldo's misfortune.
The majority of tweets centred around the idea that the footballing great was too old to be reacting in such a manner, regardless of whether the decision was a fair one or not.
'Ronaldo crying after booting a defender and trying to rip his hair out is actually so funny,' One viewer wrote. 'Embarrassing from one of the greats'.
Another described the whole affair as 'Under-9s antics' while one joked that we now have pictures of the striker crying in every kit he's ever worn in his career.
Naturally, the incident gave many a chance to compare Ronaldo with great rival Lionel Messi, who scored a hat-trick on Tuesday night.
Tijan_milla
64
Well you cant blame the fans for trolling him knowing fully well Messi was trolled also after losing the final in the Argentina jersey. All the same..i still believe it was a harsh call by the ref and very unfair
prashantttiwarijr10
40
that same ref this ref is a curse on football
chibuike4224
32
people blabbing that he just touched his hair. what gave the right to touch his hair, is he paying his bills? please Ronaldo do dive sometimes which we all aware of but i have never seen any one touch his hair after he dives. and besides the ref took explanations from the lines man before making the decision so i dont think they would ban the ref