Tensions are rising over the awarding of the Africa Cup of Nations to Morocco following Faustino Varela Monteiro’s op-ed in L’Observateur.
The vice-chairman of the CAF Appeals Committee publicly expresses his disagreement with the organization’s official line.
In his view, questioning the facts established during the matches constitutes a major procedural error that undermines institutional authority.
Monteiro places particular emphasis on the primacy of the refereeing body to justify his technical opposition. He reiterates a fundamental rule of sports:
“I strongly disagree with the decision. The facts described in the match official’s reports are presumed to be true and accurate until proven otherwise. If discrepancies arise, the referee’s report takes precedence on the field.”
Finally, the official warns that this decision could prove tenuous before international legal bodies.
He emphasizes that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) generally adheres to a doctrine of non-interference, except in cases of flagrant injustice.
“The CAS will not review a decision made on the field unless there is evidence of arbitrariness or bad faith, even if the decision appears erroneous in hindsight.”
Glorykay1
0
CAF na useless govern body. corruption and stupidity is the foundation
Cukaknort
0
May Africa excuse the world with they nonsense.
Zuzeiopryz
0
true
hidaclmnst
0
, Corrupted CAF legends
Sakaeinors
1
if we continue having winners decided by the courts then football will loose it's flavour. How on earth would someone enjoy food taken right from another person's throat after a thorough chewing?
Naokmptuz
0
Where was he when the decision by the Appeals body was made? This is hypocrisy!
For those criticisiing the Vice Chairman of the Appeal Committee, that may not be fair. This is because Decisions made at Appeal are based on the numbers of jurists or panelists who decided for and against. For example, if the Appeal Committee is made up of 7 people and 4 voted or decided against Senegal (that represent majority), the votes/decisions of the therr(3) people who voted in favour of Senegal will not be enough to overturn the decisions of the 4 members of the committee especially where the Chairman supported
hizbdeiot
0
how can an organization like CAF not think about the possible outcomes before they act? now African football integrity is on the line
It is beyond the line already
lehaceiotz
1
how can an organization like CAF not think about the possible outcomes before they act? now African football integrity is on the line
pomcpt
0
Where was he when the decision by the Appeals body was made? This is hypocrisy!
SGTSingam
2
Close this Chapter and Move on to the next Chapter