The Premier League has reached a settlement with Manchester City over its challenge to sponsorship rules – paving the way for the club to complete a wide-ranging deal with Etihad Airways.
In a significant development, the competition told its clubs today that they it has managed to find an agreement with City, bringing an end to a long-running saga.
City have effectively been at war with the competition, with the club successfully having regulations on commercial partnerships with associated parties (APTs) branded unlawful.
They initially acted after a proposed deal with Etihad Airlines, who sponsor the club's shirts and hold the stadium naming rights, was blocked by the Premier League in 2023 because it was not deemed to be of 'fair market value' (FMV) under the rules.
A legal challenge was issued, and a tribunal sided with City, deeming the rules - brought in following the Saudi takeover of Newcastle United, 'void and unenforceable'.
However, despite the threat of further legal action, the Premier League decided to tweak rather than rewrite the regulations. Again, City acted, and the same panel that had already ruled in their favour was due to hear the case next month.
However, in an interesting move that may signal a thawing in relations between the two parties, Daily Mail Sport understands that the Premier League has now contacted clubs to inform them that they have agreed a settlement with City, and that the hearing will no longer take place.
It is also understood that barriers to the Etihad deal have now been removed and that City are confident that they will not be treated differently to any other top-flight club going forward.
In 2011, City penned a 10-year, £400m agreement with Etihad, which is the state airline of Abu Dhabi, from where the club's owners hail. While no details of the new agreement have been released, it is expected to mark a significant uplift on the deal completed 14 years ago.
The development may be seen as yet-another victory for City, although the Premier League may well be relieved to bring the chapter to a close – and will no doubt take comfort from the fact that the amended rules will remain in place.
The issue is not linked to the Premier League's case against City for more than 115 alleged breaches of its rules on spending. A decision on the long-running saga remains elusive.
The Premier League introduced APTs in 2021 in an attempt to combat what they saw as the prospect of clubs signing inflated sponsorship deals with parties linked to their ownerships.
After their agreement with Etihad was blocked, City claimed the rules were anti-competitive and therefore unlawful. An independent tribunal panel made up of three legal big-hitters found three elements of the rules – including the fact that shareholder loans (loans to clubs from stakeholders often subject to little or no interest) were not subject to the same FMV assessment meant they were unlawful.
That same panel was due to sit next month but will no longer do so.
A statement released on Monday read: 'The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League’s Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.
'This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.
It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter.'
kabbelryz
1
man u vs man city
vuaabdipu
0
With this been done ✔️ Winning a Prem or a UCL can allow Man City to spend €600m or more if they want to
femaklnoty
2
So what next for man city now ?
[image]
banga man see lips 👄
yambcklrsu
0
This means it’s a separate case, “The issue is not linked to the Premier League's case against City for more than 115 alleged breaches of its rules on spending. A decision on the long-running saga remains elusive.”
keep telling that to yourself..City is not guilty
AFerPeQq8367
1
This also means that the Man City weren’t able to remove the rule and must still abide by it going forward, “… although the Premier League may well be relieved to bring the chapter to a close – and will no doubt take comfort from the fact that the amended rules will remain in place.” In this Court ruling, there’s no victor and non vanquished. That’s the complexity of the judicial system
AFerPeQq8367
2
This means it’s a separate case, “The issue is not linked to the Premier League's case against City for more than 115 alleged breaches of its rules on spending. A decision on the long-running saga remains elusive.”
TheMentor
0
For competition to be fair, the expenditure gap should not be too wide, it seems the old rule over protected the already well established clubs
lightrex
1
Prove it kiddo
u still hav 115 charges or did u forget?
youngfarmer_10
0
So what next for man city now ?
Jabacnostu
0
It's Not Over till it's Over OVERALL !!! 😬😀😂😝
At least EPL is exposed and disgraced... your teams who voted against Man City are also put to shame! If you want to defeat Man City you must defeat on Fitch not by discriminatory and dubious rules! 4 titles, 1 treble and many breaking records that had never seen before in the EPL history. Pep has done the impossible!
Sekaknprty
0
Dogs wanted to stop Man City but Man City is a Lion. Rivals dogs tried to influence with fake allegations. Now those d@gs are silent when other teams are spending 100m on a single flop player lol
those dogs are 7up or united, Fersenal and liverpool
SGTSingam
2
It's Not Over till it's Over OVERALL !!! 😬😀😂😝
Munbcdlty
0
I don’t understand city
cause int no city fan u jus fake jus like de rest
chembahassan
1
we are city
ManCityFanForever
0
they buy players with their revenue unlike shitty who pumps money through illegal sponsorship deals
Prove it kiddo
lightrex
1
Dogs wanted to stop Man City but Man City is a Lion. Rivals dogs tried to influence with fake allegations. Now those d@gs are silent when other teams are spending 100m on a single flop player lol
they buy players with their revenue unlike shitty who pumps money through illegal sponsorship deals
satbcety
2
This is part of the news that got me to understand the rule is biased to the smaller clubs that city finally got themselves out. "that City are confident that they will not be treated differently to any other top-flight club going forward."
Dapcmostz
6
Manchester City The Great 🩵💪🏻😎
Dutaimstu
2
Wìth mon̈ey most problems can be solve.£££
Ceplnprtu
1
this is music😂😂🤣
ManCityFanForever
9
Dogs wanted to stop Man City but Man City is a Lion. Rivals dogs tried to influence with fake allegations. Now those d@gs are silent when other teams are spending 100m on a single flop player lol
Gicoco12
3
What money can’t do eh doesn’t exist
Darex0001
2
I don’t understand city
Vambeiknou
1
nonsense post
BrianKessy767
4
city have never lost a case..eufa,fifa premier league 🩵🩵💪💪
pamalmnpt
3
What they are talking about