Manchester United face the possibility of being banned from Europe next season because of Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
British billionaire Ratcliffe is on the verge of sealing a £1.3billion deal with the Glazers which will see his company, INEOS, acquire a 25 per cent stake in United, marking what they hope to be the first step in a staged takeover. But Ratcliffe's petrochemical conglomerate already own French outfit Nice, raising an issue for the Red Devils' hopes of playing Champions League football.
Under UEFA's current "multi-club ownership" rules, the only way in which both United and Nice could both play in Europe next term is if one qualifies automatically for the expanded Champions League group stage and the other directly enters the Conference League. A UEFA source told the Sun that the situation is "clear," as teams controlled by the same party must be prevented from facing each other in the same competition, as stated by Article 5.02 of UEFA's regulations.
Should the pair each finish in their respective divisions' Champions League places, the team that finishes higher of the two will be awarded qualification, while the other would banned from Europe. If, however, they were to finish in the same position, then United would get the nod because of England's ranking at the top of UEFA's "access list."
Earlier this year, though, both the Red Devils and Nice - who currently sit second in Ligue 1, while United are sixth in the Premier League - received hope, as UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin suggested during a chat with ex-Old Trafford captain Gary Neville that their multi-club ownership rules will soon be relaxed.
"We are not thinking about Manchester United only," Ceferin revealed on the Overlap in March. "We've had five or six owners of clubs who want to buy another club. We have to see what to do. The options are that it stays like that or that we allow them to play in the same competition.
"I'm not sure yet. We have to speak about these regulations and see what to do about it. There is more and more interest in this multi-club ownership. We shouldn't just say no for the investments for multi-club ownership, but we have to see what kind of rules we set in that case because the rules have to be strict.
"From one point of view it's true if you are the owner of two clubs and they play in the same competition you can say to one club to lose because you want the other to win. But for you, as a football player, do you think it's so easy to do that, to tell a coach, lose the match because the other wants to win?"
noubdnruy
1
What about Ribzig for Germany and also Salzburg for Austra are they not own by same person but both play Champions league almost every season and play each other as well
they're not in England bro
tiydlostuz
0
What about Ribzig for Germany and also Salzburg for Austra are they not own by same person but both play Champions league almost every season and play each other as well
LibraLeo
0
i see united turned to Nice if nice qualify fot UEFA united fans must support nice coz utd will be on conference league....Glazzerz are so crazy they want united to fully disappear from Eropean champions but selling the share to jimmy
Kipcinrs
1
This deal has no good in it, this Billionaire grandpa will borrow money to buy his share, he will not build the stadium now MANU face de possibility of being banned from Europe . Oh Lord, we came at the wrong time to support MANU every day problem and problem and problem. U just ignore someone who could have pumped money cash , I mean Cash money , build the studium . Who does that? Only trio of devils: Glazers, Sir Alex yes him and this grandpa billlionaire.
Chocobo
0
well, focus on PL is not bad.
TommyTang
0
Absolute rubbish, SJR is not the real owner of MU. He is only a minority shareholder and would be just bringing a team to manage the club's operations
Raocmnosty
0
A team is already in non European football competition instead of saying ban from conference league
tembkopy
0
corupt club Manchester United
Corrupt Man City fan
Modys
1
Let them qualify first 😂😂
ifadac
5
Manchester United will qualify and play in next season UCL .... and the blood pressure of HATERS will continue to rise to the level of hypertension 🙄😳
Kesadlor
2
what about man city and girona?
Wehcdikoz
2
same owner but different fans, fans won't allow any messes from the owners or they risk demonstration that could push them from ownership.
vinacdinpy
1
why stupid
Yoyclmruy
0
ManUtd should be banned from Champions league, Premier league and all Uefa competition as the owners have refused to sell the club, am fed up!
Obk994
0
Leipzig and RB Salzburg is own by the redbull company and both teams play in UCL so what's the fuse here?
It's only a problem when man utd get involve. Man City group owns Girona in Spain let see how that plays out
viucdelnz
0
corupt club Manchester United
dekabkmns
0
no need to ban united because they didn't qualify next season
Divine_Armour
0
Leipzig and RB Salzburg is own by the redbull company and both teams play in UCL so what's the fuse here?
Kkrexuke
0
Nonsense, Radcliffe's 25% is minority. The glazers own over 50% of the clubs shares making them the controlling party. Banning and denying them of revenue if they qualify for Europe guarantee UEFA to be sued. Unless the billionaire control both club in majority, then that is a different story.
Jeremykyan1
1
saying all this as if Nice will actually qualify for the Champions League
Davidi09
1
Lies he owns nice but his 25 percent stake on Manchester don’t give him higher chance of making decisions so this news is nonsense for me
Lomacektyz
0
Its fine so we go a retreat to reborne..maybe in our next life we will be able to win it UCL
BrintonC
1
How do Liepzig and Salzburg both play in the UCL? Both clubs are owned by Red Bull.
BrintonC
0
Leipzig and RB Salzburg is own by the redbull company and both teams play in UCL so what's the fuse here?
Damn good question...
hansing
0
Just one more reason why majority of fans want a complete sale
Mebacoy
1
Man City Fans Are Happy ☺️😁
Mebacoy
0
Ask Glazer And Sir Ratcliffe Man City Fans Are Happy 😁😊
Focilps
0
I just want Manchester city to be ban
cry somewhere else
lbcrna
2
I just want Manchester city to be ban
Obk994
2
Leipzig and RB Salzburg is own by the redbull company and both teams play in UCL so what's the fuse here?
enjroyale88
0
i hope all man utd players are together to get streak lose all the games, so the glazer and jim left the club 🤣
Vezonic22
0
At this rate with wanting this football club down so badly, just loan it to the haters and critics...
nemcmoryz
0
Honestly, I think MU still not qualify for UCL next season.
Kudbcdlmsu
1
Someone owns 25% of club. Does he have ownership control?
Kaychooku
2
“Multi-club ownership” Sir Jim is buying a 25% shares of man utd, but owns Nice, I don’t see how that applies to this rule if he doesn’t own man utd
Famcenoptu
1
sir Jim leave the team no United supporter is with you we don't need you pli
viecinopr
0
Why not just say the truth? I don’t know what I’m doing, and everything will depend on how much money I can extract from these rich owners to line my pockets.
Famcenoptu
0
yes we need jassim as the owner
kazacikou
2
what about if man city and Girona finish first all u will bun which one
Nazdilmpr
1
Bullshit, it's time to give it to Jasmin