According to the Manchester Evening News, Elliott-Anderson remains Manchester City's top transfer target this summer, and the Sky Blues are reportedly considering a third bid for the England international.
Manchester City's second bid of £120 million this week was rejected by Nottingham Forest, which included an initial transfer fee of £106 million and £14 million in add-ons.
It is understood that Nottingham Forest and its owner Evangelos Marinakis are insisting on a higher upfront transfer fee for the 23-year-old midfielder, whose current contract with Nottingham Forest runs until the summer of 2029.
Forest believes that the sales of Rice, Enzo Fernández, and Moises Caicedo for over £100 million in recent years demonstrate Elliott-Anderson's value, and they hope to secure a record-breaking transfer fee in British football, surpassing the £125 million Liverpool paid for Newcastle player Isak last summer.
Manchester City's interest in Anderson remains strong, and he is their primary target for summer signings, but the Sky Blues intend to adopt a wait-and-see approach and are unwilling to get involved in a bidding war with Forest.
It is understood that Elliott-Anderson himself prefers a move to the Etihad Stadium, while Manchester United has lowered their interest in the midfielder due to the difficulty in meeting Forest's asking price. This makes Manchester City Elliott-Anderson's only true suitor, and although Forest may continue to be firm on the transfer fee, both sides are expected to find common ground in the coming weeks.
As Elliott-Anderson is set to participate in the World Cup with England, and considering the Three Lions' schedule, the deal is unlikely to be officially finalized in the coming weeks, but Manchester City and Forest could still agree on the transfer fee and related terms beforehand.
The Sky Blues are also targeting other midfielders, with strong interest in Newcastle midfielder Tonali, and may yet abandon Elliott-Anderson to pursue other alternatives. However, for now, Manchester City is fully committed to signing the Forest midfielder and is confident of reaching a deal.
Dr_Coleman
0
headline it says Manchester united the content is all about Manchester City
Hilterz
3
The headline is different, The news is also different.... I think thus App is confused...
vumaeinpy
0
city really don't need this guy
vumaeinpy
0
Another Grealish loading for 115 charges
why you don't say another flop Sanchez loading, every player city want pirate united always wants to hijack.
fapaekpyz
0
they should keep him
Simcdkloy
2
This app writers i dont think they are proffesional, they are just bunch of guys who repeat what farizio romano says, they don’t even know who makes a bid for anderson man City or man utd. And if they dont found any sport news they will publish about Players girl friends or something didn’t exist, funny we still use this app.
WellingtonBanda
0
pound is no means devaluing right?! 🤔🤣
Raacelmnpu
1
can't spend a day without mentioning utd
Rudceklmnr
1
you must always include man utd name In every headline to sell newspaper
wuuadimrsu
0
Never....
Vicsammy
1
Are they crazy, United or city
dougiefresh
2
Another Grealish loading for 115 charges
Pimabceips
1
Just go and get Mateus Fernandes.
PrinceAbobyBlinkz
1
Useless admin, why's the headline talking about United
Pimabceips
1
why the headlines of Man Utd making 3rd bid?
cutbceiknt
1
for a player who only have 9 goals contribution what wrong nottingham forest
Yundeostz
1
u dey man watin concerned man u with this rubbish
demagnate_
1
imagine forest demanding 125?
Rinkachi2221
1
Since when did Man Utd made the 1st and 2nd bid..🤔
resabekpst
2
Another flop coming all these £100m players never do well. the price tag will drown them.
Rice is definitely not a 100 ml flop.
mayaeilps
0
man utd abi man City which one 3rd bill oga know what you're writing here is man City not my utd biko
nasaeipuy
0
the title is wrongly written bwt
pataekru
2
This writers are maybe drunk or why saying Manchester United bid while we did not make any bid? Useless
MuscabAxmed
3
English players are always overrated and does nothing
Emchi
3
Manchester United should not be clouded with these English players.
jiwabnoruz
2
Another flop coming all these £100m players never do well. the price tag will drown them.
wusiklnosz
2
the amount is too high please
keaadt
1
Nonsense. He wants to play for city so why united wants to pay more to get him if he’s not interested. BS.
JboyIxHere
1
E be like say Forest want to run Mad😂 £125 for who?
Daphoenix23
7
MAN UTD clickbait till you had to use MAN UTD for Man City… Losing it with this app this days
Wicaceouy
3
what's wrong with you guys always Manchester united nonsense
ciyeiklmrt
2
who is writting this
Voeadeilpy
4
no disrespect to Anderson but that is hell lots of money..