Enzo Maresca had no doubt that Manchester City's derby day winner was clearly not offside, despite Pro Ref now confirming the officials made a mistake.
City made it four wins from four Premier League games under new boss Maresca by edging out fierce rivals Manchester United 1-0 at Old Trafford.
Erling Haaland grabbed the goal for 10-man City, who had Phil Foden sent off midway through the first half, when he steered home from Josko Gvardiol's cross.
The goal was initially ruled out for offside, but it was awarded when a VAR check found that Haaland had stayed onside.
However, United's anger comes from the fact that Enzo Fernandez, who was offside, made an attempt to reach the ball before it got to Haaland at the back post.
Maresca, though, felt it was a simple decision.
He told Sky Sports: "It was completely clear that the goal was not offside.
"In the moment I was told by the fourth official, I celebrated early, because I knew."
Pro Ref, the governing body previously known as PGMO, has, however, confirmed it had contacted United to concede an error had been made.
In a statement carried in several media outlets, a Pro Ref spokesperson said: "Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland's awarded goal.
"The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR, and he was found to be in an onside position.
"In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective; however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
"Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem as an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place."
City are the first visiting side to win 10 times against Manchester United in the Premier League at Old Trafford – across the last 11 seasons (since 2016-17), no English top-flight fixture has seen more away wins than the Manchester derby (10).
This was the first time United generated less than 1.0 expected goals (xG) in a Premier League home game under Michael Carrick (0.95).
And United managed just two shots on target after Foden's 23rd-minute dismissal – they did hit the woodwork twice for the second Manchester derby in a row, however.
"It is the emotion of the derby after [winning with] 10 men," Maresca told BBC Match of the Day.
"It is always nice to win with 10 men, but a derby is a special game for everybody. I was happy, and I think it was a normal reaction.
"After the red card, the plan changed completely. The spirit, effort, togetherness of the players has been fantastic."
Maresca had no complaints about Foden's sending off, though he did feel Fernandes should also have seen red, as he instigated the flashpoint by kicking the City attacker.
"I think it was a red card [for Phil], to be honest, but also in the same action for Bruno, not just for us," he added.
wutbceikmr
0
coz the red card shown to Foden was not a red card. Both Bruno and Foden should have been shown Yellow. This is karma.
truthisbitter
0
Hypocrisy at its best; will he still maintain the same stand if that happens to his team??
which hypocrisy?They wanted united to win but their devilish plan was scattered on their face!
Binlause
0
That's derby. Next at Etihad we shall exact revenge. For now, we need points in the bag to mount a serious title challenge. Carrick needs to improve on his tactics. He got it all wrong last night, United never got going.
Exact revenge?! I bet your team can't beat City with 1 man down
Binlause
0
Forgive him! When he'll start losing, he'll understand. He's just happy because it's a dream to win a derby while you're a man down
Red card on Phoden, also Bruno should have been handed one so lets talk about it!
Binlause
0
Hypocrisy at its best; will he still maintain the same stand if that happens to his team??
Lets talk about Bruno kicking Phoden 🤔
Binlause
0
when it favours hom then there is no problem. his own time will still come just matter of time.
Lets talk about Bruno kicking Phoden
truthisbitter
0
when it favours hom then there is no problem. his own time will still come just matter of time.
we will still deal with it, Referees biases not a new thing to us,we suffered hell with 10men and still managed to defeat them, who's like CITY
truthisbitter
0
when it favours hom then there is no problem. his own time will still come just matter of time.
This App is bent on fulfilling manutd narrative, complete blackout on foden incident!
Zipdelpsu
0
both Haaland and enzo were in offside position when the cross was made and it was dorgus touch which makes Haalands goal legible ok but enzo interferes the play the goal should have been ruled out there itself but the blind micheal oliver and spineless VAR awards them goal i can't believe it
I tot you said Dougue touch make the goal eligible?
Desciklnot
0
both Haaland and enzo were in offside position when the cross was made and it was dorgus touch which makes Haalands goal legible ok but enzo interferes the play the goal should have been ruled out there itself but the blind micheal oliver and spineless VAR awards them goal i can't believe it
every goal interfere is should be disallowed but we hardly saw disallowed instant Karma city deserves the win 100%
bengr88t
1
when it favours hom then there is no problem. his own time will still come just matter of time.
Rickylubs
2
Hypocrisy at its best; will he still maintain the same stand if that happens to his team??
suaaekpu
1
Haaland wasn't offside. He did what every good striker should do. RUN IN, TAP IN, be in the right place at the right time. SCORE. VAR not required.
Gesso
2
today is in his favor so it is clear onside. how long u will soon complain but by then you will be crying your own cry
MwenePuta
1
Forgive him! When he'll start losing, he'll understand. He's just happy because it's a dream to win a derby while you're a man down
AdarshDavid
0
Ball touched UNT winger’s foot !!
enzo was way way offside and he interferes the play
AdarshDavid
1
both Haaland and enzo were in offside position when the cross was made and it was dorgus touch which makes Haalands goal legible ok but enzo interferes the play the goal should have been ruled out there itself but the blind micheal oliver and spineless VAR awards them goal i can't believe it
Fotbeimor
1
am confused
UjoAbx
0
VAR, just to manipulate the football rather than helping them
Litaelosz
0
What is the purpose of having VAR?
Heikal_Mahsir
1
That's derby. Next at Etihad we shall exact revenge. For now, we need points in the bag to mount a serious title challenge. Carrick needs to improve on his tactics. He got it all wrong last night, United never got going.
vacdeknouz
1
Ball touched UNT winger’s foot !!
vubcdemsz
5
very true. I still remember the match when Man United was awarded a goal against City, when Bruno was in an offside position and attempted to play the ball/ went for the ball, but failed to reach it and Rashford scored. Exactly, the same scenario!!!
Zobbdioptu
0
Man Utd fans and players are crying foul forgetting they were celebrating Foden's dismissal. They forget how Fernandes and Rashford played the same tactic and awarded a goal, deeming Bruno to have not touched the ball.
rouemnosty
0
Chaotic
Ribbcdrsuy
0
That is true to me
Ribbcdrsuy
0
YEAH BUT THE WAY HE HAS THE BEST VOICE AND HIS VOICE WAS JUST A GOOD THING
Ribbcdrsuy
0
I’m going back in the morning
Sieenpst
2
useless refs