Double-legged fixtures in the world of football can be contentious, with many believing the team which gets to play at home second has an advantage.
But research done by scientists in Belgium has crunched the numbers and found this myth to be unfounded.
A total of 320 two-legged matches were analysed from the UEFA Europa League and Champions League between 2010 and 2017 and no evidence was found to support an advantage either way.
A random 'Non-seeded' two-legged confrontations occur before the main Bournemouth and a random draw decides which team plays first at home and which team hosts the second leg.
Teams hosting second went through to the next stage of the tournament 48.8 per cent of the time, with those playing at home first having the edge.
However, the small difference between both types of teams was not statistically significant and may be down to coincidence,researchers explain.
'This second leg home advantage, if it exists, seems to be compensated for by other dynamics,' said researcher Simon Amez from Ghent University.
'Probably, a second leg home team that has overcome a bad first leg result can only do so by taking big tactical risks that can be linked with higher chances of conceding goals.'
It has long been thought playing at home second is preferable as it allows any situation to be corrected.
Having home advantage, where the team feels more conformable and has the support of the crowd, is therefore a bonus in allowing them to manage the game successfully.
It is thought to be most prominent when the first game was a draw or it goes down to extra tie or penalties.
Having the return leg at home was beneficial this year for Liverpool, as they mounted one of the most memorable Champions League comebacks of all time against Barcelona in the semi-finals.
The men from Merseyside suffered a 3-0 defeat in Spain but, when the return leg was played at home, prevailed as victors with a 4-0 win.
They would later go onto win the competition, the sixth in their history.
However, the second leg at home myth failed Leeds United in their push for promotion from the Championship this year.
They were playing rivals Derby County and in the second leg at Elland Road, Derby prevailed in a 4-2 stunner which sent them through to the playoff final at Wembley, at the expense of Leeds.
kingderick
1
Its an advantage.. Most of the comeback you see are winning teams playing at their home ground..
spurs nko.... Ajax against Madrid Juventus vs Ajax man u vs Psg... check well
Ayonava Dey
2
Its an advantage.. Most of the comeback you see are winning teams playing at their home ground..
vimbdnry
1
Magical Liverpool is the right answer
sekcelmory
0
Barca don't agree. No answer to the Anfield atmosphere despite a 3 goal advantage.
Paris had 4-0 advantage over Barca and came to loose at Barcelona home, is that place too Anfield?
GainHafizul
1
Ask barca, they know better than anyone.
jikcdkmsy
3
THIS IS ANFIELD; ADVANTAGE ANFIELD!
bizou650
1
Only Valverde can explain this for bottling two away games after winning at Home... for two consecative season...
Dedemis
0
In the lower leagues you avoid a lengthy travel on the day of the match and a substandard dressing room- but at Premier League/Championship level even the away dressing rooms are immaculate and they travel on pristine tour buses and stop in decent hotels.
Shuntamallett
0
Clearly the authors of the report were not in attendance at Anfield for the Barca game. Or the Chelsea game. Or St Etienne......etc, etc. More wasted funding.
gadgets
0
Unless that fixture is Anfield.
zusamman
0
Barca don't agree. No answer to the Anfield atmosphere despite a 3 goal advantage.
hukcal
0
Batting first in cricket is most definitely a big advantage!
James23
0
Try telling that to Liverpool after beating Barcelona 4-0
KativaJames
0
We don't want scientists to be part of football let them go do their analysis in the laboratory.
10andreas
0
Scrolled through the comment section still no video!😂
Kutelnop
2
Nice