Ahead of the upcoming 2025 FIFA Club World Cup in the United States, the International Football Association Board (IFAB) has clarified that there was no direct regulation for the double touch by Atlético Madrid’s Julián Álvarez in his team’s penalty shootout defeat to Real Madrid in the Champions League round of 16. IFAB has now ruled that starting from July 2025 (potentially including the Club World Cup), if such an incident occurs, the penalty must be retaken if it results in a goal.
Real Madrid benefit in Champions League from ‘double touch’ penalty
IFAB, which sets the laws of soccer, explained that referees tend to penalize the player for a double touch, which was not previously directly regulated. Polish referee Szymon Marciniak did exactly that to Álvarez, whose penalty ‘miss’ was crucial in helping Real Madrid eliminate Atlético from the tournament.
However, IFAB also notes that “not penalising an accidental double touch would nevertheless be unfair, as the goalkeeper can be disadvantaged by the altered trajectory of the ball”. This is explained in a circular released on Tuesday.
The IFAB have sought to clarify Rule 10 - Determining the Outcome of a Match and Rule 14 - The Penalty Kick regarding situations where the kicker accidentally strikes the ball with both feet simultaneously or when the ball touches the kicker’s non-kicking foot or leg immediately after the kick. This is what happened with Álvarez’s penalty.
IFAB’s new ‘double touch’ penalty law
“This situation is rare, and as it is not directly covered in Law 14, referees have understandably tended to penalise the kicker for having touched the ball again before it has touched another player, thus awarding an indirect free kick to the opposition or, in the case of penalties (penalty shoot-out), recording the kick as missed,” reads the Circular.
“However, this part of Law 14 is primarily intended for situations where the penalty taker deliberately touches the ball a second time before it has touched another player (e.g. when it rebounds from the goalpost(s) or crossbar without touching the goalkeeper),” the Circular continues. “This is very different from the penalty taker accidentally kicking the ball with both feet simultaneously or touching the ball with their non-kicking foot or leg immediately after they have taken the kick, which usually occurs because they have slipped when taking it”.
IFAB has therefore decided that, starting from July 2025, “if penalty taker accidentally kicks the ball with both feet simultaneously or the ball touches their non-kicking foot or leg immediately after the kick”, the penalty will be retaken if it is scored.
If the penalty is missed, an indirect free-kick will be awarded to the defending team (unless the referee decides to play advantage), while it will be recorded as a miss in a penalty shoot-out.
That will also be the case should the penalty taker be deemed to “deliberately” touch the ball with both feet (which would be highly unusual).
Will the new penalty law be in place at the FIFA Club World Cup?
The new laws are “effective for competitions starting on or after 1 July 2025 and may be used by competitions starting before that date”. With the FIFA Club World Cup running from June 14 to July 13, the change could come into effect for the tournament, which means there would be no repeat of Álvarez’s bizarre penalty and Atlético’s controversial elimination.
Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.
Madridkingen
0
A competition started from semi-final, hand picked team were invited without Barcelona. Madrid president been part of the members of the organization.Robbering invited team to Madrid to win the Champions League in their first 5 UCL. You keep boasting you won 15 UCL SHAME
yea you are talking about Inter miami i think😂😂 they got invited for doing nothing but Barcelona is not their and now you guys are salty af🤣🤣
Sumclpruy
0
MADRID SQUAD 2025/2026
[image]
no vinicius , like seriously?!
HQuinto
0
A double touch in penalty shootout remains the same as before and it would count as missed penalty. read carefully and understand haters of realmadrid.
[image]
Wouldn’t it have been retaken ?
HQuinto
0
He was never correct he should have retaken the penalty
That was before the rule change. Rules replaced as a result of an occurrence. There are rule changes every year, do you believe it should apply retroactively? The Referee made the right decision, following the rules at the time. Now that it has changed, moving forward it will be handled differently.
Huyerstyz
0
That referee is a bastard.
ADZRORKGODSON
1
🥱🥱🥱 ”benefit” or not we are the team with 15 Ucl, thank you and good night☺️
A competition started from semi-final, hand picked team were invited without Barcelona. Madrid president been part of the members of the organization.Robbering invited team to Madrid to win the Champions League in their first 5 UCL. You keep boasting you won 15 UCL SHAME
Doocdmnprz
0
MADRID SQUAD 2025/2026
al_ameen_101
1
It is always real madrid against the world nothing new
Lovebug2
0
A double touch in penalty shootout remains the same as before and it would count as missed penalty. read carefully and understand haters of realmadrid.
[image]
There was no direct law. That was supposed to be a legit goal. Anyway Arsenal took it personally🤣🤣🤣🤣
yenelmnopr
1
A double touch in penalty shootout remains the same as before and it would count as missed penalty. read carefully and understand haters of realmadrid.
Junablops
0
It's clear that Real are nothing without Refeee & VAR
Lil bit*h
Badassexpert
0
It's clear that Real are nothing without Refeee & VAR
Before VAR arrival: Real Madrid will not Win anything After VAR Arrival : VAR are Helping Real Madrid 😂😂😂
Dudcdlmuz
0
🥱🥱🥱 ”benefit” or not we are the team with 15 Ucl, thank you and good night☺️
AMEN!!!!!!!
OFFICIAL88
1
It's clear that Real are nothing without Refeee & VAR
Are you mad? 😭
sampin
1
It's clear that Real are nothing without Refeee & VAR
cry more
2muchmoney
0
the ref to was correct to cancel
He was never correct he should have retaken the penalty
redackryz
0
So that useless ref just choose to favor Real Madrid na waaaaa ooooo
the ref to was correct to cancel
Vooastuy
4
It's clear that Real are nothing without Refeee & VAR
redackryz
1
great news
/MADRIDISTA
1
🥱🥱🥱 ”benefit” or not we are the team with 15 Ucl, thank you and good night☺️
Exactly 😂😂😂
Yakbcemprz
1
how many clubs
Dunabknty
1
rayar
2muchmoney
4
So that useless ref just choose to favor Real Madrid na waaaaa ooooo
Suubdlnuz
0
same rule.. AF making news with it
posceklty
0
🥱🥱🥱 ”benefit” or not we are the team with 15 Ucl, thank you and good night☺️
Keep quiet how much dey your account
Madridkingen
5
🥱🥱🥱 ”benefit” or not we are the team with 15 Ucl, thank you and good night☺️