At the end of VAR's toughest weekend since it arrived in the Premier League, former referee Dermot Gallagher gives his verdict on the big decisions - and the news that the top flight has called for an investigation into the technology's usage.
Man Utd 3-1 Arsenal
INCIDENT: Martin Odegaard plays Gabriel Martinelli through to finish off an early opening goal at Old Trafford. However, VAR takes two minutes and 18 seconds to rule the Norway midfielder fouls Christian Eriksen in the build-up, and disallows the goal. Odegaard later tells Sky Sports it was "never a foul", and Mikel Arteta criticises the decision as "soft".
TIME TAKEN BY VAR: Two minutes, 43 seconds.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Correct decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "I thought it was a foul. I thought it was clear and obvious. He pushes him and then catches him lower down the body. He catches his knee with his leg so for me, it's a foul. He had two arms in his back.
"I thought it was a foul during play, and when the VAR checked it I was quite confident it would be overturned. It was very early in the attacking process but there was no chance to reset."
Everton 0-0 Liverpool
INCIDENT: Virgil van Dijk catches Amadou Onana on the shin after he is beaten to a ball forward. Referee Anthony Taylor immediately awards Van Dijk a yellow card, and the decision is not reviewed by VAR. Everton manager Frank Lampard later says Van Dijk should have been sent off over the incident.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Correct decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "I think it's a yellow card. He goes down but the maximum impact comes on top of the foot. Because he's come a short distance, he hasn't got the speed and intensity. The biggest point of impact is on the bottom of the foot.
"I think it's a foul and a yellow card. I don't think it's a red card. We saw a similar tackle with Fabian Schar last week [against Wolves], where we agreed we felt that wasn't a red card."
Chelsea 2-1 West Ham
INCIDENT: Maxwel Cornet scores a stunning late equaliser for West Ham to bring them back to 2-2 at Chelsea. The goal is disallowed after a long VAR review, during which Andy Madley is sent over to the review monitor, for an alleged foul on Edouard Mendy by Jarrod Bowen, despite what appears minimal contact. The PGMOL later the decision was made in error, while West Ham manager David Moyes calls it a "ridiculously bad decision".
TIME TAKEN BY VAR: Two minutes, 23 seconds.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Incorrect decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "I didn't think there was a foul on Saturday and I don't think there was a foul now. It raises a number of issues and it became complicated because VAR got involved. The clue is in if you watch the referee as the incident is unfolding. The referee has got the best position he could have on the pitch.
"He's got everything in front of him, he can see Mendy on the floor and he's seen Bowen. He's got all the information he needs. I know that when you go to VAR, you can be advised to see things from a different angle to make a different decision. But when he went to VAR, he saw the same images.
"He saw the same angle, so I don't know what changed for him. The VAR felt the goalkeeper was injured and he didn't have the same feel that Andy Madley had on the field. That's what played a major part in this. The goalkeeper on the ground took priority over the decision itself. I think the VAR focused on the goalkeeper, thinking he was injured."
Newcastle 0-0 Crystal Palace
INCIDENT: Tyrick Mitchell nods into his own net after a header is knocked back across goal from a Kieran Trippier free-kick. VAR sends referee Michael Salisbury to the review monitor, after which he changes his decision and disallows the goal for an alleged foul by Joe Willock on goalkeeper Victor Guaita, even though he appeared to be pushed into him by Mitchell. The PGMOL also later admits this decision was an error.
TIME TAKEN BY VAR: One minute, 29 seconds.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Incorrect decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "I think when the VAR has looked at it, he's focused on the point of Willock going into Guaita as he's gone to clear the ball and it looks a foul. What he hasn't done is focus on the whole outcome. If he had looked at the arm of Mitchell, that is where the foul occurs.
"It raises all kinds of issues. Referees are all about options and the best referees don't close their options. He can either give a goal - which is risky as the ball isn't in the net when Willock collides with the goalkeeper, so I think you can't do that.
"He could give a penalty, for the push from Mitchell on Willock, this I think it is. Or he can take the option he did - which I think is the worst option. But that option has arisen because he was driven down a very narrow path of not viewing the whole incident."
Brentford 5-2 Leeds
INCIDENT: After Ivan Toney is earlier awarded a penalty following a VAR review, Crysencio Summerville appears to be fouled in the Brentford box by Aaron Hickey, but there is no such review of the incident. Leeds manager Jesse Marsch gestures referee Rob Jones towards the review monitor, and is sent off for his reaction. He later calls the two decisions a "lack of respect" over their consistency.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: 'Maybe'.
DERMOT SAYS: "The initial shirt pull, the referee doesn't see. As it's outside the box, the VAR can't act, and once he goes into the box he releases the shirt.
"It comes back to what the threshold is - which is the dilemma we've been having today. If the Brentford player was still pulling the shirt into the box, without doubt it would've been given as a penalty.
"Then he's looking at whether the player has clipped him on the foot or whether he is moving forward. It's a 'maybe' - and you can't give a penalty for a 'maybe'.
"On this point, there is an element of doubt. The match officials felt it didn't hit the threshold so they played on. The referee had a perfect view in real time so he doesn't need to be referred to VAR. He doesn't even consider a penalty."
Brighton 5-2 Leicester
INCIDENT: Alexis Mac Allister scores a 30-yard thunderbolt to give Brighton a 3-2 lead over Leicester two minutes after half-time. The goal is overturned by VAR for an offside against Enock Mwepu's attempted overhead kick in the build-up, although the midfielder does not connect with the ball or appear to affect James Justin's headed clearance towards Mac Allister.
TIME TAKEN BY VAR: Four minutes, 31 seconds.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Correct decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "The problem was that they needed to establish whether the player was in an offside position. The next element to it is whether he impacts the defender's attempts to head the ball out.
"The only person who can make that decision is the referee on the field. The factual part of offside then goes out the door here because the referee is then sent to the screen to decide whether the overhead-kick play a part in reducing the defender's ability to head the ball clear.
"He felt the answer to that was yes - and I agree with him, which is a shame because it's such a great goal. But if you watch it back, his boot is very high so the defender doesn't get the connection he'd want.
"Because he came from an offside position, he has to be offside. The process is long because they had to go through each step. It's unfortunate as it's one of the best goals you'll ever see."
Aston Villa 1-1 Man City
INCIDENT: Philippe Coutinho is denied what appears a perfectly fine goal for an erroneous offside decision. VAR is unable to overrule the assistant referee's flag, as the whistle has already gone before Coutinho's shot crosses the line.
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Incorrect decision.
DERMOT SAYS: "It was an error from the assistant - I don't think it was an error from the referee. The assistant has flagged when he's not offside.
"Referees are encouraged to let the game flow, but bear in mind that Coutinho came back six, seven or eight yards to fetch the ball.
"At that point, if the referee has seen an assistant's flag... even if he's encouraged to delay and delay blowing his whistle, given how long it took for Coutinho to come back, in your mind you're always going to whistle.
"By the time Coutinho shot, the whistle had long gone."
butbeimnp
0
nbb1
nemcmoryz
0
VAR is good, but referee who controls VAR should be improve. And referee in the field should look at monitor himself every time at the field before final making decision.
shakragunners
0
And this was incorrect decision👍
yubadnpstz
0
Rubbish
leobikmpyz
0
what is this VAR why na
Jaubeknor
2
why do they hate Chelsea so much in England
bolaji99
0
I think arsenal fans can rest now, this is another words from another referee, I never see any referee that can alow Martineli goal
Spizaetus
0
EPl suggest advice to review the decision Chelsea Vs West Ham united what about Chelsea Vs Tottenham.. Chelsea were the victim
according to this post you totally agree that Chelsea got advantage from VAR during West Ham game 🤣. But disadvantage from Spurs game
Spizaetus
0
To sum it up, VAR did brilliant jobs and every decisions is correct, unless tlit involves the oil club, and VAR gave advantage to oil clubs. That is Dermot opinion, dont blame me. But I totally agree with his assessment
DominicChege
0
Var should be suspended for the season please
I agree with you
Wapmnort
1
yes, two minutes and 43 seconds, and they called it back, but according to mr Mike dean 44 second was too long for him to call back the play when the Tottenham player fouled havertz, HYPOCRITES
Mikbklnos
1
any contact in the box, it's a foul,he stumbled he left his foot which made contact with Mendy's shoulder,he showed his six studs upon jumping which lead to dangerous play 😲
GeoffCarr
0
there fucking football up teams are losing points over it which can cost them at end of season needs to be changed fast cause its ruining football
truefanbarca/Gun
0
I think they use for for too much things they should only use it in the 18 yard box
Tokbdklnps
1
referee for arsenal and manunited is no self confedent why u turn to var when u see clearly manunited player falldawn but not seriously it is a soft.
Kancdimrt
0
the question is what are they investigating? why are the referee apologizing? And why are they using VAR when it feels like the time VAR was not existing
Hiscenprst
1
you seem to be very high on cheap weed if you didn't see Mendy being fouled after he made a save
rakbknoy
3
To sum up everything,England referees should be very much ashamed of themselves.I think robotics referees should be used instead 🙌🏻🙌🏻🤜🏻🤛🏻
zioacmopru
0
VAR is a complete waste
I totally agree with you.
zioacmopru
1
Nonsense verdicts, correct or incorrect. They are certainly of no use. Medicines after death. How do the verdicts and useless apologies assuage for the points the affected teams lost? It would have been heater if after all these nonsense verdicts and apologies from the referees' body, sanctions are placed, the matches awarded to the affected teams or the matches cancelled and replays ordered. The EPL are in the news for very bad reasons since the start of this current season.
fimbcdotu
2
VAR is a complete waste
AlameenMalami
0
Premier league is getting very controversial 😏
AlameenMalami
7
Premier league coaches are no longer scared of their rivals but they’re scared of referees and VAR decisions 😔
AlameenMalami
0
Premier league will be spoiled very soon is this doesn’t stop
Zayacimos
0
Referees spoiled matches in the EPL !
Leubikmnr
0
i think this predictor always responds things against chelsea
N0_N0NsENSE
0
A review for reviews doesn't make sense
doteiknos
0
What was Dermot's verdict when Chelsea played Tottenham?
Kunkunmaster
0
Var should be suspended for the season please
no please it would be worst
Fancemns
1
Var should be suspended for the season please
only when it doesn't favour you😂
vusaeilort
1
All these EPL refrees and their VAR are biased and match fixers.Their refreing is very dodgy,suspicious and biased
kaocelmu
0
all those goals were perfect goals and were not supposed to be ruled out
Bozbklmo
1
his opinion are all correct
best190
2
he pushed Eriksson but Saka was not pushed and he was in rush to give arsenal players card while man u players got away easily with nothing......
merriment500
0
I concur with your candid opinion
Fatbdiot
0
ur right in some not all n u dont talk with much sence in some
Randimpsty
4
EPl suggest advice to review the decision Chelsea Vs West Ham united what about Chelsea Vs Tottenham.. Chelsea were the victim
sobbkort
1
I think your opinions are all correct.
andrewxy431
2
Var should be suspended for the season please