Cristiano Ronaldo’s lawyer released a statement claiming the legal documents published by Der Spiegel relating to rape allegations were “altered and/or completely fabricated.” More to Read: Las Vegas police: Original evidence in Ronaldo rape investigation hasn’t been lost
American Kathryn Mayorga has accused Ronaldo of sexually assaulting her in a hotel in Las Vegas in 2009, something the Portuguese has strenuously refuted.
German publication Der Spiegel first reported the claims, which also included the suggestion Ronaldo paid Ms Mayorga $375,000 in 2010 as part of a privacy agreement, preventing her from going public with the allegations. Ms Mayorga filed a lawsuit last month in an attempt to quash that agreement while Las Vegas police have re-opened an investigation.
Ronaldo's lawyer Peter Christiansen confirmed the payment was made to Ms Mayorga, but criticised a fresh report at the weekend which he says was based on doctored evidence.
In a statement, Christiansen said: "I have been hired to represent Cristiano Ronaldo with respect to the recent civil complaint arising from events alleged to have occurred in 2009, all of which were the subject of a mutual release between the parties in 2010.
"Given the breach of that agreement by the other side and the inflammatory accusations that have been lodged in the ensuing days as a result, Mr Ronaldo feels compelled to no longer stand silent and in fact, is entitled under that agreement to respond proportionately in kind.
"To be clear, Mr Ronaldo vehemently denies all of the allegations in the complaint and has consistently maintained that denial for the last nine years.
"The documents which purportedly contain statements by Mr Ronaldo and have been reported in the media are complete fabrications. It is my understanding that in 2015, dozens of entities [including law firms] across many different industries throughout Europe were hacked and their electronic data was stolen and captured by a cyber criminal.
"This hacker attempted to sell this data, and one media outlet has now irresponsibly published the stolen documents, significant portions of which were altered and/or completely fabricated. To absolve any doubt, Mr Ronaldo has always maintained, as he does today, that what occurred in 2009 in Las Vegas was consensual in nature.
"While Mr Ronaldo does not deny the existence of the mutual agreement and release, his motivations for agreeing to that resolution have been twisted to say the least.
"Far from any admission of guilt or any ulterior motive, Mr Ronaldo was advised to privately resolve the allegations against him in order to avoid the inevitable attempts that are now being made to destroy a reputation that has been built upon hard work, athleticism and honour.
"Unfortunately, he now finds himself embroiled in the type of litigation that is all too commonplace in America."
Christiansen's statement went on to stress Ronaldo's innocence while again strongly criticising the reporting of the allegations facing the Portugal captain.
"While Mr Ronaldo is accustomed to being the subject of press attention that goes along with being famous, it is absolutely deplorable that any media outlet would support or advance such an elaborate and deliberate defamation campaign based on stolen, easily manipulated digital documents," the statement continued.
"Mr Ronaldo will leave future discussion of any and all legal matters to his attorneys here [in Las Vegas] and in Europe. He is confident that the truth will survive this frenzy and the laws of Nevada will be upheld and enforced."
Dumbdimou
420
I trust you my hero.. You will live and see your enemies falls to their knees..
Amanda-
287
1st they say it didn’t happen, now he says the documents are invalid and now he’s saying what happened in 2009 is consensual ! Wow 😮 what a stupid lawyer. What should we believe? This is a criminal case and this dumbass lawyer just made it absolutely difficult for Ronaldo to win this case . In criminal cases it is absolutely important to be silence don’t say anything because whatever you say will be use against you in the court of law . The video Ronaldo made, saying it was all fake new is evidence number one . The none disclosure agreement made back in 2009 is evidence number two ,that something happened and their was an agreement made between both parties. It’s now left for the judge to say if it’s valid or not . Evidence 3 , if there was nothing back in 2009 , why did they went into an agreement and payment of almost $400k . They would have let the situation play out in 2009 . This dumbass lawyer has finished CR7 . He should be fired and a credible lawyer should take up this case . Because all this things he just said here is BS . He said what happened was consensual, why the hell did they pay her ? They shouldn’t have . This is my points: we the CR7 fans may believe Ronaldo , but the law doesn’t work that way , the law works with proofs and right now what i am seeing in tams of evidences doesn’t favor Ronaldo. You may think i am saying shits . But the truth about our lives is : may people are in prison for doing nothing. You can kill someone and get away with it, if you have a good lawyer, in the case of OJ simson . Ronaldo should get a new lawyer. Good luck 🍀 Ronaldo.
Christopher_Robin
234
I'm not here to say That Ronaldo did it or not. But I feel even if he did this isn't something he deserves. It was something that happened 9 years ago and should've been settled on the spot and not brought up again like this. It has lead to a lot of problems for his image which isn't something anybody deserves. If he is innocent I really hope that that lady gets some sort of a punishment. #CR7
ATaz
206
Ronaldo doesn't need to rape someone to fullfill sex desire! These all thinks are fake. Stand with ronlado (messi fanboi)
Sodelu
195
May be lie, why lady said this more than after 9 years May be lady like to insult him If really they did this at that time may be it was heaven now after 9 years it is converted into hell, better to investigate properly and complain is lie, give punishment to lady, This kinds of complain should not be come after certain years,
jukknrstuy
162
the truth will eventually be revealed