Why are people so happy to see Lionel Messi brought so low at World Cup?

It is a strange world we inhabit when the struggles of Lionel Messi, a footballer who has brought so much joy to so many people, are greeted with glee by some and triumphalism by others. Why would seeing Messi brought low make you happy? Why would seeing a bird trapped in a cage make you rejoice?

Maybe it is because his subdued performances so far at this World Cup are thought to vindicate a twisted, confected, malevolent opinion that the Argentina forward has always been dependent on the talent around him at Barcelona and that without his supporting cast, he is really rather ordinary.

Maybe it is because some have become so obsessed with championing Cristiano Ronaldo’s case as the greatest player in the world that they think they are furthering his cause by heaping scorn on the one rival whose own sublime talents have always denied the Portuguese the right to be considered the best.

I was at the Spartak Stadium in Moscow last Saturday to see Argentina’s laboured draw with Iceland and I watched their 3-0 demolition by Croatia in Nizhny Novgorod in an Ekaterinburg bar full of Peruvians who found some solace in Argentina’s misery after their elimination from the tournament earlier that evening.

The evidence of both those games was that even a forward line of Messi, Pele, Johan Cruyff, George Best and Diego Maradona wouldn’t be enough to rescue this mess of an Argentina side. Misshapen and disorganised, caught between one defensive formation and another, it’s football’s equivalent of an army unit gone rogue.

‘Are my methods unsound?’ the renegade colonel, Kurtz, asks Captain Willard in the film Apocalypse Now. ‘I don’t see any method at all, sir,’ Willard replies. Argentinian football’s Armageddon is organised along similar lines. Jorge Sampaoli did great things as manager of Chile but it is easy to see why he is detested and distrusted by Argentina fans.

So, sure, Messi was subdued. You would be subdued, too, if you watched your goalkeeper chipping the ball to Ante Rebic, who volleyed it straight back past him into the roof of the net for Croatia’s opening goal. You’d be subdued if your manager was pacing the touchline, ashen and sweaty, looking like a man on the verge of a nervous breakdown.

The Argentina defence was a shambles against Croatia and Iceland and their midfield was not much better. Javier Mascherano was a fine player once but he plays his club football for Hebei China Fortune now and he looked 34 going on 54 against Luka Modric and co. Messi might have missed a penalty against Iceland but he worked tirelessly to try to spark his team into life. By the time he faced Croatia, admittedly, he looked as if he already knew the game was up.

Does any of this affect the way he will be viewed by future generations? Well, it will count against him in the arguments about where he stands alongside Pele and Maradona, in particular, if he never lifts the World Cup. But the same applies to Ronaldo. Messi at least dragged an average Argentina team to the final against Germany four years ago in Brazil. That already seems to have been forgotten.

It also seems to have been forgotten that for a player who can’t hack it without Andres Iniesta, Xavi, Luis Suarez, Neymar and the rest of his Barcelona buddies, he has somehow managed to blow away a legendary striker like Gabriel Batistuta and establish himself as his country’s all-time leading scorer. He has 64 goals in 126 appearances for Argentina.

Not bad for someone who is accused of not caring when he plays for his country. If anything, he cares too much.

As for Ronaldo, his contribution to this World Cup has been electrifying. They were lucky, those who were there in Sochi, to see his stunning performance against Spain and his dogged, indomitable refusal to accept that he and his Portugal team were beaten. His athleticism, his sheer force of will and the technical beauty of that last-gasp free-kick marked him out once again as one of the all-time greats.

Does that diminish Messi? No. None of what has happened at this World Cup has changed my opinion one iota about him. Nor has it tarnished any of the memories I have of seeing him play live. Every single one, and particularly the time I took my son to watch him perform at the Nou Camp so he could say he had seen him play, has been a privilege. It is a shame he is not lighting up this tournament. It would be better for it if he were.

Still, two ordinary games for Argentina is nothing when set against the canon of his achievements. Nothing. Because when I say ‘achievements’, I don’t just mean Champions Leagues won or La Ligas lifted or records set. I mean the entertainment he has provided for more than a decade.

If there is a difference between Messi and Ronaldo that strikes me most, I think it is that. Ronaldo seems to be doing this for his own greater glory. Messi is more self-effacing. He is doing it for the joy of it. I love watching Messi play.

I know Ronaldo is a magnificent player but I can’t get past mere admiration for him.

Unconsciously or knowing, there is a love of the football aesthetic in what Messi does. There is a desire to make the game beautiful for people to watch. And here is the irony for those who persist in saying that Messi cannot do it without a great team behind him: maybe that’s because he is a team player.

Ronaldo, first of all, is an individual. He puts himself first. At Barcelona, Messi plays for the team and the team play for him. His genius is unselfish. Ronaldo’s is not.

Whatever happens at this World Cup, whether Portugal win the thing and Argentina lose to Nigeria on Tuesday and don’t even make the second round, I’ll always prefer Messi. If only one man of this generation is to be anointed the successor to Pele, Cruyff, Maradona and Zidane, it can only be him.

Raheem Sterling is one of England’s best players and one average game against Tunisia does not change that. I hope he keeps his place in the England team on Sunday and, if he does, I think he’ll play well and score.

If he is left out, I hope Gareth Southgate finds a way to rehabilitate him and restore his confidence sooner rather than later. The public may have lacerated him after the match in Volgograd but our chances of progressing in this tournament are far better with him in the side than sitting on the bench.

Journalists not here to spread propaganda

The idea that news organisations should suppress news when it is waved in front of their faces — as was suggested when photographers appeared to capture the England line-up — is an interesting concept but it is unlikely to catch on.

I have very much enjoyed the greater degree of openness that Gareth Southgate and the FA encouraged between the players and the media in the build-up to this tournament.

It is pleasing that it has created a more cordial spirit, some barriers being broken down and a raft of excellent interviews with a group of young footballers who are extremely easy to like and whose stories are inspiring to read. As a long-term strategy, it can only yield positives for both sides.

It has also been a pleasure to witness our FA behaving like an organisation ahead of the curve. A few ex-footballers, such as Danny Murphy and Stan Collymore, stuck in the sad old ways of the past, and a lot of angry people on social media have suggested that the price for this new spirit of open dialogue should be for journalists to act as propagandists when it comes to reporting on the England team.

Fortunately, Southgate is smarter than that. ‘I don’t expect the media to be supporters of us in terms of the way they work,’ the England manager said on Saturday. ‘They’re here to work. I know they want us to do well.’

That is the beginning and the end of it.

There is no reason why the positivity around the team should not continue to grow.