Related：
Chelsea
Manchester United
Aston Villa
Lazio
Fenerbahçe
Mourinho
Sarri
motbclmopy
0
Bother
Deebdeilmu
0
If Arsenal could've bought those three for that £105m, they be very far
Deebdeilmu
0
If Arsenal could've bought those three for that £105, they be very far
Fehckmost
0
what about Ur caicedo?? 116mil and Enzo 121mil are they better than rice???
Enzo not in that argument he just way beta
captainahmady
0
what about Ur caicedo?? 116mil and Enzo 121mil are they better than rice???
help me ask him bro
beuekopuz
1
These are the kind of players one had expected Chelsea to sign instead they went about signing all manner of kids and inexperienced players. Worst thing is that many of these young players are immediately sent out on loans. The question is why do you buy these players if you don't need them immediately in your team. See how Chelsea is struggling early in the season against teams like West Ham who bought only players they needed to improve their team in the immediate.
Ikomendiso
2
westham will go far this season they will be competitors for top4 💯
Ikomendiso
0
the selling of Rice.. was the best for West ham...😏😏🥳🥳€105m.. 🤯
what about Ur caicedo?? 116mil and Enzo 121mil are they better than rice???
chukwuka29
6
the selling of Rice.. was the best for West ham...😏😏🥳🥳€105m.. 🤯
Kehabcelmz
3
he's very good
ZAZA19
3
I hope Arsenal put a sell on clause on Mavropanos