Inter striker Mauro Icardi does not have an option to veto a permanent move to Paris Saint Germain according to a report from French newspaper L'Equipe.
Multiple reports in recent weeks have suggested that Icardi had a clause which would enable him to say no in the event that Paris Saint Germain choose to activate their €70 million purchase option but L'Equipe insist this is not the case.
In fact, Icardi has already agreed the terms of the contract he would sign with the reigning French champions when he joined them on a season long loan from Inter during the Summer transfer window.
The 26-year-old Argentine has been in sensational form since arriving in the French capital having netted 17 goals in 19 appearances across all competitions.
For this reason, the report goes on to state that Paris Saint Germain are extremely likely to take up their purchase option on the former Sampdoria striker.
zoyaceiktu
0
its time to delete those two teams...this time for psg and man city
PSG? BWAHAHAHAHAH😂😂😂😂
AnasShelpaye
0
He's playing for PSG what do you expect. He will be netting so many goals against such low level teams. Even if all the best players in ligue 1 form a team and compete against PSG they'll lose
if madrid took 3 without any main strikers ...what about you 🤣dont think about other teams think of your team
AnasShelpaye
0
Barcelona...REAL Madrid need you
its time to delete those two teams...this time for psg and man city
__arkopaul__
3
Argentina plzz call icardi and di Maria back to the squad
Yeecloyz
1
Barcelona...REAL Madrid need you
bhavya18
2
He's playing for PSG what do you expect. He will be netting so many goals against such low level teams. Even if all the best players in ligue 1 form a team and compete against PSG they'll lose
isaacjunior
2
PSG IS STILL BETTER WITHOUT ICARDI
Pallab707
4
great player great number 9 in the field and off the field . not wanda its Mauro
Ali_LB
1
If only he was still at inter.. Lautaro Lukaku, Lautaro Icardi, Icard Lukaku...
FootballFAN2110
0
Why would he wanna veto it haha
Apparently for a possible Juventus move, but I don't believe that either.
FootballFAN2110
0
Normally in this kind of deal, the contract negotiations for the possible future transfer are agreed prior to the loan deal. So, this doesnt surprise me.
Henklmz
3
Why would he wanna veto it haha
Leontheguru
1
top ten finishers in world football