Gabriel Jesus continues to spark talk of interest from Juventus and Giovanni Branchini, the man who helped to take the Brazilian striker to Manchester City, admits “everything is possible”.
The South American frontman has been at the Etihad Stadium since January 2017 and he committed to a contract extension with the Blues in August 2018 which is supposed to keep him tied to the reigning Premier League champions until the summer of 2023.
There have, however, been suggestions that the highly-rated 22-year-old could be lured elsewhere before that agreement comes to a close.
Jesus faces fierce competition for minutes at City from Sergio Aguero, with the prolific Argentine showing no sign of slowing down.
Serie A giants Juve are said to be keen on offering Jesus the prominent role he craves alongside Cristiano Ronaldo and Co in Turin.
Branchini admits that few big-money deals are likely to be done in the next transfer window, given all that is going on in the world, but there is a chance that the odd deal which appears “unthinkable” could be pushed through.
He told Calciomercato when quizzed on whether there is any chance of Jesus linking up with Juve: “We are talking about a great footballer and a great club, everything is possible.
"The difficulties of acquiring power will lead to not many transfers, it is better to keep who you already have in the squad, there will not be a lot of movement on the transfer market.
“But some clubs with great economic power could lead to some sensational transfers that previously appeared unthinkable.”
Amid the talk of Jesus heading to Italy, there have also been reports of City boss Pep Guardiola being a long-standing target for Juventus.
Questions have been asked of his future in England, amid a potential two-year Champions League ban and no contract extension, but Branchini doubts a move away from Manchester will be made any time soon.
He added: “I am convinced that he will stay at City as long as City want him, as long as the team wants to maintain a certain type of profile.
“The only hypothesis I see is that if the owners should reduce their commitment or ambitions – which I don’t think will happen – he will accept the farewell, but he will never want to leave.”
Jzcaballero
0
That would be a sick one
ManCityFanForever
0
almost all of them
Why Karius is not playing then?
ohfoyf
0
Where is improvement?
almost all of them
ManCityFanForever
0
Grujic has improved on loan, despite shitting his pants in Kiev he did well, Klavan did alright, Shaqiri got Mourinho sacked, Solanke (ok he was shite) Van Der Berg is still 18 and when he has played has done alright, Adrian was for free an wasnt all bad, Minaminto has only just arrived, Sturrage did u see him up too 16 17, Lallana the same as Sturridge,Clyne only did bad thanks to an injury and TAA tearing it up in Europe,and Keita hasnt been a bargain but hes done alright.
Where is improvement?
ohfoyf
0
Grujic, Karius, Klavan, Solanke, Shaqiri, Sepp Van den Berg, Adrian, Takumi, Strurridge, Lallana, Clyne and Naby Keita??!!! I’m probably missing lot of them? How many of them has improved why u bought them?
Grujic has improved on loan, despite shitting his pants in Kiev he did well, Klavan did alright, Shaqiri got Mourinho sacked, Solanke (ok he was shite) Van Der Berg is still 18 and when he has played has done alright, Adrian was for free an wasnt all bad, Minaminto has only just arrived, Sturrage did u see him up too 16 17, Lallana the same as Sturridge,Clyne only did bad thanks to an injury and TAA tearing it up in Europe,and Keita hasnt been a bargain but hes done alright.
ManCityFanForever
0
Nasri? Mangala? Stones? Tevez? Nolito? Kyle Walker? Mendy? Bravo? Cancelo? Danielo? Robinho? Balotelli? Navas? I'm probably missing a lot of players here too. But ye,city change all there players for the better
Grujic, Karius, Klavan, Solanke, Shaqiri, Sepp Van den Berg, Adrian, Takumi, Strurridge, Lallana, Clyne and Naby Keita??!!! I’m probably missing lot of them? How many of them has improved why u bought them?
ohfoyf
0
All of them
Nasri? Mangala? Stones? Tevez? Nolito? Kyle Walker? Mendy? Bravo? Cancelo? Danielo? Robinho? Balotelli? Navas? I'm probably missing a lot of players here too. But ye,city change all there players for the better
ManCityFanForever
0
only like half of them
All of them
ohfoyf
0
Same does Man City do
only like half of them
ManCityFanForever
0
we changed him for the better. if you mean buy them and then change them then our entire squade is made
Same does Man City do
ohfoyf
0
U made VVD?
we changed him for the better. if you mean buy them and then change them then our entire squade is made
ManCityFanForever
0
we make players in a way,like Gerrard TAA, Carragher,Elliott,and some more in the making.
U made VVD?
ohfoyf
0
But you’re historic club u should make players why buying success
we make players in a way,like Gerrard TAA, Carragher,Elliott,and some more in the making.
ManCityFanForever
0
we replace players
But you’re historic club u should make players why buying success
ohfoyf
0
The question is why u buy?
we replace players
ManCityFanForever
0
so u saying that lfc have spend 395 million since 2016 is very hypocritical
I said 395m approx there is more count it go.
ManCityFanForever
0
but we have sold players for big fees to make up for the spending man city do nine of the sorts
The question is why u buy?
ohfoyf
0
So?
so u saying that lfc have spend 395 million since 2016 is very hypocritical
ohfoyf
0
I know pool spend a lot
but we have sold players for big fees to make up for the spending man city do nine of the sorts
ohfoyf
0
How long has that been 2yrs?
nah
ohfoyf
0
U don’t I know
lol
ferdude
0
bah I supported lfc all my life.
How long has that been 2yrs?
ManCityFanForever
0
and I took so long to reply because there was so many
I know pool spend a lot
ManCityFanForever
0
since then man city have spend roughly 695 million in British pounds.
So?
ohfoyf
0
I haven’t even estimated all the transfers since 2016 only 75% approx, still crossed 395m.
and I took so long to reply because there was so many
ohfoyf
0
I haven’t even estimated all the transfers since 2016 only 75% approx, still crossed 395m.
since then man city have spend roughly 695 million in British pounds.
ManCityFanForever
0
ye I do however I doubt you even know what sport were talking about
Guess u don’t know asking me indirectly😂
ManCityFanForever
0
well if it is then ye u dont
U don’t I know
ManCityFanForever
0
and at least 377 in sales and when did we spend 395? if it was this decade all together u have 1 billion tho so...
I haven’t even estimated all the transfers since 2016 only 75% approx, still crossed 395m.
ohfoyf
0
I know you don’t have.
ye I do however I doubt you even know what sport were talking about
ohfoyf
0
If having knowledge end up like being you, better don’t have it.
well if it is then ye u dont
ohfoyf
0
Not more worse than 395m
and at least 377 in sales and when did we spend 395? if it was this decade all together u have 1 billion tho so...
ManCityFanForever
0
no you dont otherwise you would have some sort of knowledge of the game
I know you don’t have.
ManCityFanForever
0
no you dont otherwise you would have some sort of knowledge of the game
If having knowledge end up like being you, better don’t have it.
ohfoyf
0
I see😂
no you dont otherwise you would have some sort of knowledge of the game
ManCityFanForever
0
well this 'kid' knows the game better than u
I see😂
ManCityFanForever
0
yes and 250 million is worse
Not more worse than 395m
ManCityFanForever
0
yes there own owners bscly
Spek eglsh
ohfoyf
0
Bro he’s a kid new pool fanboi😂
well this 'kid' knows the game better than u
ohfoyf
0
Bet you in the next two or three years he’ll be supporting whatever team is doing good by then
bah I supported lfc all my life.
ohfoyf
0
Yes, 100m still bad
yes and 250 million is worse
ohfoyf
0
Sale? How can you be so fool look at our sponsors and how many clubs City football group owns.
yes there own owners bscly
ManCityFanForever
0
Bet you in the next two or three years he’ll be supporting whatever team is doing good by then
Sure he will.
ferdude
0
Bro he’s a kid new pool fanboi😂
Bet you in the next two or three years he’ll be supporting whatever team is doing good by then
ManCityFanForever
0
Yea
Bro he’s a kid new pool fanboi😂
ManCityFanForever
0
no there not stop crying [Crylaugh][Crylaugh][Crylaugh]. If they were fake then who is your biggest sale?
Sale? How can you be so fool look at our sponsors and how many clubs City football group owns.
ManCityFanForever
0
that's still bad
Yes, 100m still bad
ferdude
0
that's still bad
You will never let go your hatred for man city will you ?
ferdude
0
he is?!
Yea
ohfoyf
0
Exactly we don’t spend 100m on a single player we buy different players by diversifying our investment.
that's still bad