Related：
CzechWolverhampton WanderersLadislav KrejčíFIFA World Cup
Latest comments
GaddafiJamal
0
2025-02-20 02:30
Blaqpablo
So city didn't make profits abi
Is Reading & Understanding Your Problem? Who’s Talking Of City Here? 🤔🤦♂️
Blaqpablo
0
2025-02-20 02:28
GaddafiJamal
Look At The Net Spend Before Your Talk 😂💔
So city didn't make profits abi
Blaqpablo
0
2025-02-20 02:27
Bavarian1996
Can any manager even do what Klopp have done? Didn’t had to spend so much to make a world class squad
So the 70m on both vvd and Allison bought Salah mane and so on bro he spent alot
Bavarian1996
0
2025-02-13 20:51
Can any manager even do what Klopp have done? Didn’t had to spend so much to make a world class squad
inikalilah
0
2025-02-06 01:35
1b spending 🤣🤣🤣
Ruudimnpry
1
2025-02-05 21:04
mapbcelt
1
2025-02-05 13:24
obi1010
see Chelsea income 💙💙
well done. you are a good bank lol
GaddafiJamal
0
2025-02-05 13:15
Dasacklrtz
did you see how much sales Chelsea made mainly from academy players which is pure profit
Look At The Net Spend Before Your Talk 😂💔
obi1010
1
2025-02-05 09:11
see Chelsea income 💙💙
lightrex
1
2025-02-05 08:51
catbdeikpz
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
do u know how these economics work??? Club owners can maximum give 25% & the rest of the budget Should be from Revenue (gate receipts, media, sponsor, player sale, commercial deals, merchandisingss etc.)...Man City is charged Because not only pumped money far more than the 25% limit Through third party sponsors, they also kept lying about it years after years....they were repeating it every year...Man utd spent 1b but they didn’t cross their limit Because their revenue is far greater, in fact the highest in the world
Hunter_m
2
2025-02-05 08:38
catbdeikpz
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
It’s not only about spending, it’s about spending compared to how much profit made
Mutbopruz
2
2025-02-05 08:36
okay for ucl
Dasacklrtz
1
2025-02-05 08:28
catbdeikpz
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
did you see how much sales Chelsea made mainly from academy players which is pure profit
catbdeikpz
2
2025-02-05 08:09
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
GaddafiJamal
0
So city didn't make profits abi
Is Reading & Understanding Your Problem? Who’s Talking Of City Here? 🤔🤦♂️
Blaqpablo
0
Look At The Net Spend Before Your Talk 😂💔
So city didn't make profits abi
Blaqpablo
0
Can any manager even do what Klopp have done? Didn’t had to spend so much to make a world class squad
So the 70m on both vvd and Allison bought Salah mane and so on bro he spent alot
Bavarian1996
0
Can any manager even do what Klopp have done? Didn’t had to spend so much to make a world class squad
inikalilah
0
1b spending 🤣🤣🤣
Ruudimnpry
1
mapbcelt
1
see Chelsea income 💙💙
well done. you are a good bank lol
GaddafiJamal
0
did you see how much sales Chelsea made mainly from academy players which is pure profit
Look At The Net Spend Before Your Talk 😂💔
obi1010
1
see Chelsea income 💙💙
lightrex
1
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
do u know how these economics work??? Club owners can maximum give 25% & the rest of the budget Should be from Revenue (gate receipts, media, sponsor, player sale, commercial deals, merchandisingss etc.)...Man City is charged Because not only pumped money far more than the 25% limit Through third party sponsors, they also kept lying about it years after years....they were repeating it every year...Man utd spent 1b but they didn’t cross their limit Because their revenue is far greater, in fact the highest in the world
Hunter_m
2
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
It’s not only about spending, it’s about spending compared to how much profit made
Mutbopruz
2
okay for ucl
Dasacklrtz
1
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
did you see how much sales Chelsea made mainly from academy players which is pure profit
catbdeikpz
2
If Man City is charged by 115 charges, I wonder how many charges EPL should change Man United and Chelsea! Where is FSR? It only applies to Man City. EPL is a DISGRACE full of HYPOCRISY and FAVOURITISM, all teams spend, but none is charged except Man City! SHAME!!!
subash26
2