The European Court of Justice has found that it is “unlawful” for FIFA and UEFA to punish clubs and players who join a European Super League.
The European Super League project has scored a major victory over FIFA and UEFA, after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that football’s world and European governing bodies are not within their rights to punish participants in a breakaway competition.
What did ECJ ruling say about Super League?
In a ruling handed down on Thursday morning, the Luxembourg court said FIFA and UEFA would be acting “contrary to competition law and the freedom to provide services” by attempting to prevent clubs and players from taking part in the Super League. “The FIFA and UEFA rules making any new interclub football project subject to their prior approval, such as the Super League, and prohibiting clubs and players from playing in those competitions, are unlawful,” the ECJ added.
The case had been brought before the ECJ after the European Super League Company and its promoters, the sports media firm A22, launched a legal challenge against UEFA and FIFA’s ability to block participants in the Super League from playing in competitions they organise.
In January, a Madrid court found in the Super League’s favour, arguing that the governing bodies were “trying to sustain a monopoly”. However, this ruling was overturned on appeal, leading the Spanish court to refer the case to the ECJ in Luxembourg.
Earlier this month, the ECJ’s advocate general, Athanasios Rantos, released a preliminary opinion which said that the two governing bodies were within their rights to threaten to sanction clubs and players who joined a breakaway league, judging those actions to be “compatible with EU competition law”.
What is the proposed European Super League?
The Super League was announced in April 2021 as a pan-European competition involving 20 teams, with 15 permanent members. Initially, 12 clubs said they had signed up for the Super League as founding members: Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atlético Madrid, Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham, Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool, Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus. However, amid a fierce backlash to the project in the media and among fans, nine clubs pulled out within days. Only Real Madrid, Barcelona and Juventus remain.
In February this year, the Super League’s organisers proposed a revised format, introducing their “10 principles for a European football league”. A22 CEO Bernt Reichart explained that the project would instead be made up of 60 to 80 teams split into different divisions. Teams would qualify for the Super League based on their performances in domestic leagues, in which they would remain (“broad and merit-based competitions” is principle number one, “domestic tournaments: the basis of football” is number two).
Each participating club would be guaranteed a minimum of 14 matches per season, which would provide “stability and predictability of revenue”, while financial transparency (principle number five) is another key factor of the proposal: “Club spending must be based solely on the funds generated and not on competitively distorting capital injections.”
The “10 principles for a European football league”:
Why does European soccer need the Super League, according to A22?
“European football is on the brink of the abyss,“ Reichart has claimed. “Huge imbalances have arisen across our continent and traditional European clubs, with a glorious past, today are unable to compete. Last October we started an open process of dialogue on the future of European football. Since then we have spoken with almost 50 clubs and other players in the sector and the conclusion shared by almost all of them is that the foundation on which European football is founded is seriously threatened. The time has come to make changes”.